preview

Paper

Good Essays

When it comes to medicine and the human body, everyone is different. We react to medications differently, to disease processes differently and especially to pain. Giving birth is one of the most natural events to occur in a woman’s life but every woman’s experience is different and so is their pain. Some are able to go through hours of labor and push for twenty minutes with pain levels they believe to be minimal. Others are unable to deal with the pain and often times anxiety that the pain can bring. Luckily for these women, medicine has evolved and the option for significant pain relief is available. The question raised when providing this option is, are there negative effects of receiving an epidural too early or late in the process. …show more content…

Early initiation is defined as cervical dilation of less then 5 centimeters and late initiation of more then 5 centimeters (Sng et al., 2014). As nurses, one of the primary goals is to advocate for the patient and The results of this review will directly help the decision process when implementing epidural analgesia, which may improve labor outcomes and satisfaction with women who are in labor.
The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews database was utilized to locate this SRR. The authors searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group’s Trials Register by contacting the Trials Search Coordinator (12 February 2014). This register is maintained by the Trials Search Coordinator and contains trials identified from monthly searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); weekly searches of MEDLINE; weekly searches of Embase; hand-searches of 30 journals and the proceedings of major conferences; and weekly current awareness alerts for a further 44 journals plus monthly BioMed Central email alerts.
Based off of the nine articles selected, this SRR is considered a level II study. Each was a randomized control trial (RCTs) and indicates strong and well-designed studies. A systematic review of randomized RCTs are at the top of the hierarchy of evidence, are level one, and are considered the most rigorous (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2015). Candidates were healthy

Get Access