Paradigm Shift Example - Thomas Kuhn

The Paradigm Shift is the transition Medieval Europe went through to become a more modernized, and civilized continent. The events that took place during the 1500’s all led up to a vast change in Europe, from all aspects. The citizen’s thoughts on religion, their leaders, science, further discovery and the church were changed during this time period.

Boeing Commercial Airplanes' launched the 787 Dreamliner, a super-efficient airplane in order to meet the growing needs and preferences of an international audience across the globe. An

The Milton Friedman paper strongly supports my views on "what is economics", and the importance of science in acquiring and presenting economic knowledge.

During the past decade, Boeing watched as their competitor, Airbus, launched several new and very successful aircraft. In 2004, Airbus surpassed Boeing in commercial airplanes delivered and future orders placed. This is the first time that Boeing has ever lost its leading market share.

This plan will mean developing bigger and newer Boeing as the prediction indicates that travel demand will surge in Asia over the next decades. This is partly due to an increase in the

The meaning of the transformative paradigm is explained in four belief systems: axiology (ethics), ontology (reality), epistemology (knowledge), and methodology according to Mertens (2009). Furthermore, (Mertens, 2009) explains that axiology emphasizes human rights and social justice; ontology rejects cultural doctrine and acknowledges the impact and consequences of power and privilege in what is deemed real; epistemology advocates culturally competent relations between the researcher and community members; and methodology employs culturally

The concord was a supersonic jet that the French and British governments created to introduce commercial supersonic air travel. It had a successful 27 year run but ended in 2003. One of

In the market for large aircraft demand the emerging niche for very large aircraft (VLCT aircraft seating more than 400 passengers) saw only two competitors: Boeing and Airbus. Even though both competitors’ moves were clearly marked by technology enhancements, and different target markets but both exhibited strategic interdependence.

Analysis: The overall strategy of Singapore Airlines may be related to their commitment to maintaining their high rankings for customer service amongst business commuters. Here having current technology in the airplanes may be relevant to Singapore Airlines in implementing this strategy. To maintain current technologies in aircrafts, it may be more cost effective to truncate the serviceable life of aircrafts and purchase new aircrafts versus allowing the fleet’s amenities – i.e. telecommunication capability for passengers or flat screen televisions in every seat - to become outdated or choose to retrofit the aging aircrafts.

This is a case about three different companies dedicated to the manufacturing of aircrafts. Those three major companies are: Boeing, Airbus Industry and McDonnell Douglas; each of one was struggling to produce enough aircraft to satisfy a seemingly unquenchable need for passenger and freight transport around the world, developed in this form many kinds of aircrafts in different models and styles.

Boeing Company has been and is still at the forefront of the aviation industry. The late 1990s were a time of trial and transition where the company encountered and overcame a number of

Jet-blue Airways is American low cost airline head quartered near New-York city. It’s foundedin August 1998 by David Neeleman with Joel Peterson as a chairman and David Barger as apresident and CEO. By late 2006,like some other airlines, JetBlue faced some softening demand and high cost due to the increase in fuel prices. Barger realizes that JetBlue needs to take further steps to slow its rate of growth. Barger was not sure about the reductions across E190 and A320. The E190 showedpromising growth opportunities and challenges for JetBlue. At the same time, the A320 wasconsidered as proven plane that had succeededover past 6 years. Most of the airline industries were using hub-and-spoke system and point-to-point services. Due to this service, South West Airlines showed consistent profits. After September 11th, the airline industry experienced trouble due to attack. Looking at the history of Jet-blue, it started with just 10airplanes in 2000 and by 2011 the company planned to have 290 planes in service. To support customers, Jet Blueprovided

Air France and British Airways was the only operator of the Concorde. The Concorde entered service in January 21, 1976, flying passengers at twice the speed of sound. Such speed didn’t come cheap, though: A transatlantic flight required the high-maintenance aircraft to gulp jet fuel at the rate of one ton per seat, and the average round-trip price was $12,000 (Linden, 2004). At its peak, the Concord was servicing nine destinations around the world, with United States being its most serviced location. Air France scheduled services from Paris to New York five days a week and British Airways scheduled services to the United States thrice weekly. A wealthy businessman can book a plane to ticket from London to New York for the rate of $6,000 on way ticket or a round trip of $12,000. This fare rate seems to be too high for an average person but to wealthy businessman or a cooperate president it’s all worth it. They can be on the plane early in the morning traveling from London to New York for a meeting and be home just in time for a family dinner. Flying the Concorde might cost a lot of money but it also saves a lot of time and to the wealthy people time is money. According to the British Airways and their CEO, the Concorde has always been a profitable airplane. The most profitable is the daily scheduled flight across North Atlantic. The British Airways would have generated a profit close to $1 million for per round trip if the airplane is full with passengers. The BBC suggests

In this essay I attempt to answer the following two questions: What is Karl Popper’s view of science? Do I feel that Thomas Kuhn makes important points against it? The two articles that I make reference to are "Science: Conjectures and Refutations" by Karl Popper and "Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research?" by Thomas Kuhn.

Micheal Shermer similarly outlined the emphasis Neo-Darwinism placed on constant reiteration of the importance of Darwin 's “idea”, defined as a singular, revolutionary entity within the history of science that was first exclusively formed in 1837 and confirmed by others1 in the vein of Thomas S. Kuhn2 (as opposed to the very gradual process of disciplinary development in evolutionary science described in nuance by Ruse, albeit with the same revolutionary interpretation present3). Coyne likewise provides a good summary of the enduring Neo-Darwinian position at present on Origins as “the book that started it all” in creating a more materialistic view of biology and the wider universe4. This idea of a paradigm-shift has been reiterated implicitly over time amongst others such as Shermer5.