Parents Who Put Their Children

People probably think, what is the reason that causes child labor. As the result, the reason of child labor is poverty, illiteracy, early married parents, war and disaster. Children from poor family might be forced to support and work for their parents. Illiteracy, In the developing countries, due to lack of employment opportunities or education, children may be work in factory to provide food and clothing for family, instead of attending school. Also, war and disasters will fuel child labor. In conflict and disasters, parents may lose their jobs and school might be destroyed, children may be forced to start work. In Afghanistan, years of armed conflicts have fueled poverty and child labor, at least a quarter of Afghanistan's 5 to 14-year-olds work to raise their families but they usually working long hours with little or no pay. A 15-year-old Afghan boy's brother and sister were working since they are five. They had been working in brick making, to clean the ground, take a shovel and pick a pickaxe, everyone is at work.

During the late 1800’s and the early 1900’s child labor was a social issue that developed in the United States. In the early 1900’s, so many children ages 16 and under were working in American mine and factories. Our kids should not be forced to work at such an early age, they need education and a good childhood that they will always remember. Some children that are as young as 4 years old are being forced to work in crammed, dangerous factories. These factories are full of poisonous fumes and diseases that can obviously kill. Kids as young as 13 are being forced to work around 13 hours a day. Working these 13 hours is exactly what most adults are working at the time. Kids are also earning a lower wage since they are minors, employers

When their work do not affect their “health and personal development or interfere with their schooling,” they do not fit the negative notion of child labor (ILO, 1996). Children sometimes assist their parents with housework and take a part in building family businesses without their working hours affecting primary education. This is indeed a beneficial experience for children, because they learn to be productive within their communities. On the other hand, ILO (1996) applies the term child labor when work “is mentally, physically, socially or morally dangerous and harmful to children; and interferes with their schooling by; depriving them of the opportunity to attend school; obliging them to leave school prematurely; or requiring them to attempt to combine school attendance with excessively long and heavy work.” When child labor is engaged in enslavement, separation from families, and misplacement of children on the streets, ILO experts refer to it as the most extreme forms of child

Many of the families that had children working had not much choice in allowing their kids to do so. One person or even two people working wouldn’t have been enough to support a whole family. Most of the children employed during this time period were working to provide income to their families. “As soon as a little

Children are being robbed of their childhood by corporations, that do not care about them. These corporations turn a blind eye towards the dissatisfying life, that is led by these children. They do not care about the children's education or the manner in which they grow up, and they expose them to harsh physical labor and unsatisfactory pay. These children are robbed of the years in which they should lead a normal child's life, and they don't get to truly enjoy being a child. These children are exposed to unhealthy situations to both the body and the mind,situations that a child should not be involved in. They are often unable to pursue proper academic studies, because of their jobs, and this could be because they aren't allowed to study, or simply that the lifestyle they lead doesn't allow them to study. On the other hand, children working at a younger age helps them shape an appreciation for hard work, and they learn to value money and time. Working at an early age also helps shape the economy of the third world countries that these children work

Document 3: I think that the workers’ condition is a result of natural law. I think that these children are most likely making very low wages due to an increase in food production, and therefore an increase in population. So, the children most likely have to work in bad conditions to be able to make any money for their poor families.

In the early 1900’s many young children had to work in factories and mills to help provide for their families. These children often died due to exhaustion and malnutrition. I do not feel that children were an acceptable source of labor, but I think I can understand why some kids had to work and why some employers would hire them. Some families may have not been able to afford to send their children to school because the money their kids made from working was important part of their families income. It probably would have been a hard decision for parents to send their children to work because they knew the bad work conditions of factories and mills. Employers would have hired children because they did have to pay them as much as adults at the

Depending upon many variables, from economic development, to political structure, corruption, and other external factors, some families need to have their child bringing home a small amount of moneys. Therefore, the child labor phenomenon is reasonable. One important which caused child labor is the poverty. The birthrate is so high that create overpopulation and cause poverty and lack of primary education. One way that many families in traditional societies attempt to cope with the pressure of overpopulation and the resulting unemployment is to send children to urban areas to find cash employment. Sending their child out on the labor force is a way to exchange for small loans or to repay the debts of the parents or grandparents. In most Asia countries, they don’t have social security for the elder, so parents often rely on their children for financial support. There were some disturbing cases that children are bought and sold for cash or for the settlement of a debt. Some

Factory work was often very dangerous for children yet they earned only a small fraction of what their parents made for the same hours. Eventually laws were passed that would ensure that children attended school and worked shorter shifts according to age. However, many industry owners in support of Laissez-Faire objected to limiting their shifts and thought that the government should have little say in the industry. The regulations that would be put into place by the government would impede on the amount of money factory owners would make. Yet still, these laws were hard to implement because family’s needed the additional wages and employers wanted to earn more capital. Karl Marx on the other hand wanted factories owners and families to stop exploiting children by making them work an unprecedented amount of hours and just let them get an education. One of the things that Marx thought was wrong about the factory owners was that they created a family dynamic that relied on their extortion of each other, which he wanted to

Unlike Akhtar et al. (2010) and Dumas (2007), Emerson and Andre (2003) believe that there is an intergenerational link with child labor. Emerson and Andre were the only researchers that tested the idea that the head of the household decides whether a child will enter into the labor market, potentially leading to several generations following the same custom (p.375). The results are consistent with their belief that there is an intergenerational link and it even stands when there is a hold on income (p.376). These results are significant even though they were conducted in 2003 because it the research focuses on the past, which is important when considering solutions for the future. Also, the results prove that there needs to be a focus not

“Child labor keeps children out of school and is thus a major barrier to development. (1)”

There were actually men who cared about their children’s wellbeing? Growing up I never knew that I was a part of something that was not considered “normal” by societal standards. To me, having a father that lived with you is abnormal. Having a father that cared for you is abnormal. Having a father that loves you is abnormal. The word ‘father’ is the weirdest word in the English dictionary. Supposedly, my father makes up half of my DNA makeup. But, does that truly make him my father? I knew that the term ‘family’ generally referred to a mother, father and their children, but a two parent household was foreign to me. My parents divorced when I was a toddler. I lived with my mother and sister all of my life and that was the normal I was used to. My mother payed the bills and made sure my older sister and I had everything we ever needed. She is the woman who I love with all my heart. My father, on the other hand, was someone I did not have any emotional attachment to. He is someone I will never be able to have a relationship with. This situation is one that effects the development of many girls in the United States.

Currently there are 168 million child laborers in the world. More than half of them, 85 million, employed at hazardous jobs, according to the International Labour Organization. In the article “In Praise of Cheap Labor Bad jobs at bad wages are better than no jobs at all”, Paul Krugman Professor of economics at MIT, explains that child labor cannot just be wiped away like so many other distasteful practices. That it takes a perfect storm of economic success and low child labor numbers for a full transition to labor laws that ban it. Employers will agree to follow the law; similar to what happened in the U.S. in the 1930’s when Congress passed the Fair Labor Standards Act. This Act established standards for the basic minimum wage and overtime pay. It restricts the hours that children under age 16 can work and forbids the employment of children under age 18 in certain jobs deemed too dangerous. Krugman believes that many developing countries are not at a point where they can support a full ban on child labor. He gives the example of countries like “Indonesia [who are,] still so poor that progress is measured in terms of how much the average person gets to eat” (Krugman 4). Professor of economics at Yale university, Christopher Udry, in his article “Child Labor” provides a definition of child labor as “ the sacrifice of the future welfare of the child in exchange for additional income” (243). The causes of Child labor are not as simple as cultural or economic reasons, and a

Poverty is the main reason for child labour. Poor households need the money, which their children can earn. Children contribute to 20 – 25 % of family income. It is obvious that the survival of certain families depends on the children’s earnings.

Eric V. Edmonds. and Nina Pavcnik are both assistant professors of economic at Dartmouth college, Hanover, New Hampshire. They are also researchers in the National Bureau of Economic Research at Cambridge, Massachusetts. In this article Edmonds and Nina share how the high-income countries perceive what child labor is,