Parker's Back And A Rose For Emily Analysis

A Rose for Emily by William Faulkner is undoubtedly a third person POV piece, however, it takes on its own tone to portray to the audience. A Rose for Emily does not pull on emotional heartstrings as much as it pulls on a shock factor. Throughout the entire short story, the reader follows the tale of Miss Emily Grierson, a mysterious and withheld young woman. The narrator shares the public’s judgement of Miss Grierson, along with slipping his own judgment occasionally. Although

     In the short story A Rose for Emily, by William Faulkner there is a very interesting character. Her Name is Emily Grierson and she is a rich southern gentile. All her life it seems that she was raised at a standard that was above the rest. By living such a secluded and controlled life it set her up for the happenings in her future.

Sean Covey an author and motivational speaker once stated, “Seeing things from a different point of view can help us understand why other people act the way they do. We too often judge people without having all the facts.” Authors like Sean Covey understand the power of point of view and use it to help the readers to relate to the characters in stories. For instance, Sandra Cisneros in her short story “Eleven” and O. Henry in his short story “The Skylight Room” effectively utilize more than one point of view in their stories to connect the readers with the characters. In “Eleven” Rachel, a young girl, describes how her teacher forced her to wear somebody else’s sweater on her birthday. Through the application of first and second person point of view, Cisneros creates in the readers a feeling of sympathy for Rachel. Likewise in “The Skylight Room” O. Henry uses first and second point of view to help the reader understand the difficulties of Miss Elise Leeson, who slowly starves as she struggles to earn enough money to pay for her little room. Also, O. Henry writes in third person point of view in order to make his facts and information believable. Both Cisneros and O. Henry write in first and second person point of view to draw the readers into the story and connect them to the characters; however, O. Henry includes third person point of view in order to make it more reliable than Cisneros’s story.

In both short stories “A Rose for Emily” and “Barn Burning” both written by William Faulkner, the point of view is one of the areas where the two stories bare a similarity. This point of view allows the reader ample time to analyze the various clues provided by the narrator, to discover the final outcome. In addition, the use of clues, or foreshadowing is another similarity found in both stories. Although, the point of view and the use of foreshadowing is similar, the delivery of these elements are not. In ‘’A Rose for Emily” the narrator uses a first-person-plural (community/group) point of view in which those telling the story have a limited perspective compared to “ Barn Burning” where a third-person individual (ten year old boy) point

The point of view of the story is a third person. The amount of information the reader knows would be somewhat that of a typical townsperson, since we do not find out right away what is really going on inside of the house, or have a deep view into Miss Emily’s feelings. From this point of view, we see things as how they would appear to a townsperson or viewer.

In “A Rose for Emily” author William Faulkner, uses the literary element, point of view, to show the town’s feelings as it reacts to the events surrounding Miss Emily, create a suspenseful tone, and convey the theme that oppression can cause someone to reach their breaking point.

Writing from different viewpoints allows the author, Tim O’Brien, to express himself in a more comfortable manner. Written in this viewpoint, the story is read as a tale instead of an autobiography and the author becomes more distant with the story like he is looking into it rather than writing it.

William Faulkner has done a wonderful work in his essay “A Rose for Emily.” Faulkner uses symbols, settings, character development, and other literary devices to express the life of Emily and the behavior of the people of Jefferson town towards her. By reading the essay, the audience cannot really figure out who the narrator is. It seems like the narrator can be the town’s collective voice. The fact that the narrator uses collective pronoun we supports the theory that the narrator is describing the life of “Miss Emily” on behalf of the townspeople. Faulkner has used the flashback device in his essay to make it more interesting. The story begins with the portrayal of Emily’s funeral and it moves to her past and at the end the readers realize that the funeral is a flashback as well. The story starts with the death of Miss Emily when he was seventy-four years old and it takes us back when she is a young and attractive girl.

The narrators of Nathaniel Hawthorne’s “Wakefield” and “The Birthmark” contiguous with Herman Melville’s “Bartleby the Scrivener,” demonstrate the readers’ preconception on point of view: how this impression frequently becomes a central influence on the storytelling process, and ultimately the reliability and consistency of the narrator. Evidently, as each fable-like story progresses, the protagonists develop their role as a product of the setting, each using a particular and distinctive approach. Moreover, readers have the opportunities to ascertain unique details in each account that divulge the qualities or traits of the main character. Most glaringly though, readers are continuously influenced by the speaker’s point of view, predominantly

Raymond Carver's "Cathedral," a story that entails a man's epiphany about a misplaced prejudice, is narrated from the first person point of view to enable the reader to fully understand the narrator's thoughts. However, in William Faulkner's "A Rose For Emily" just the opposite is true. In Faulkner's story, the narrator has a limited third person point of view which allows the reader to dodge any emotional ties with Emily, the main character, and to form his own ideas about Emily's actions. Both story's meanings rely on the fact that the author's choice of point of view gives the reader the ability to experience the narrator's epiphany as the narrator does.

The point of view of each story is told from a firsthand account of the events that occur. In “A Rose for Emily,” the story is told from an outsider’s point of view, someone who has watched and observed all that is written down. Perhaps the narrator is one of Emily’s past lovers or someone who has heard these stories simply from small town gossip. Either way, we immediately trust this narrator because they are speaking directly

Undoubtedly, a shift in point of view to the perspective of one character in A Rose for Emily would cause multiple changes in the information given about Emily, the description of her, and also the narrator’s opinion of her, all of which may paint a different overall picture of Emily Grierson for the reader. Interestingly, a lot of information about Emily’s life is conjectured by the townspeople, and ultimately seems to be correct information. However, had the story been written by one character involved in her life rather than the collective narration of the townspeople, it is possible that more information about her life could be disclosed. For example, had the Baptist minister

A Rose for Emily In this story, the point of view is told in 3rd person. This story is not 1st person because it is not Miss. Emily telling us the story.

The use of first point of view in “A Rose for Emily” shows to the reader that the narrator was a witness of the event; thus, it makes the story more

Another prime example of Faulkner's effective writing is his use of narration. Of course, in most stories the narrator is a key asset. In :A Rose for Emily" Faulkner uses the narrator not only as a story teller, but as an observer from the crowd as well. The narrator's point of view, which is third person, had a positive effect on the way a reader views the story. "Through out the story the narrator uses "we" instead of I revealing to us the way the townspeople judge Emily" (Madden 1988). The narrator thinks back in time throughout the story remembering particular events that occurred in the past. This is important to the reader in that it helps aid the understanding of how the townspeople viewed Emily. The narrator as one of the townspeople viewed Miss Emily as impervious, tranquil, and perverse. If the story had been narrated by anyone else, it may not have been as easy for the reader to completely understand. "With this spectator as the narrator, describing the events of the story through his eyes, one can detect a general impression of Emily" (Madden 1987). The view of the narrator is beneficial in understanding the things that Emily goes through. Also toward the end of the story the narrator gives the reader a feeling if sorrow and pity for Emily. It is apparent Faulkner's use of narration is critical to the enhancement and clarification of the "A Rose for Emily." After analyzing the