preview

Participatory Arts In Alfred Hitchcock's Rear Window

Decent Essays

As art slowly develops through the twentieth century, moving past voyeurism and historical art where it promotes passive spectatorial consumption, the role of the audience has evolved too. From the traditional historical passive visitor in perspective and panoptic spaces, art has gradually evolved into turning the spectator into an active contributor who not only engages with the work but also becomes the co-author in its creation and completion. Claire Bishop points out, “art must be directed against spectatorship, against the passivity of the masses paralysed by the spectacle of modern life”. This not only applies to art but to objects, image, stories, films etc. The concept of participatory arts can be demonstrated through the “Total Theatre” …show more content…

A film can be so grand and so magnificent that it will open up our eyes to things we have never even thought possible and taking us to places that we have never been. It can also be a single set as in the case of Alfred Hitchcock’s “Rear Window”. The film set highlights the symbiotic relationship between architecture and film and the importance of architecture as a stage. Hitchcock has demonstrated Friedrich Murnau’s statement “What you see on the set does not matter. All that matters is what you see on the screen” in his film. The entire film takes place in a single but diversified set that represents an apartment block shot entirely at Paramount studios, including an enormous set on one of the soundstages. Clever photography was used to create a series of film within a single film. The window of the protagonist as well as each window of the apartment functions as individual film screens offering both separate and linked stories of the characters. Both of the above projects focus on voyeurism; with the Total Theatre offering the audience the “process of immersion’ and the Rear Window engaging them in a limited panoptic surveillance. The fourth wall is broken; the audience isn’t only observing the emotions and actions of the characters, they are sucked into the narrative and forced to feel and react. The audience see and feel what the character is seeing and …show more content…

Both series fulfils the desire to antagonize the public and stage provocation. The artist relies upon the participants’ creative exploitation of the situation the artist offers, just as participants require the artist’s cue and direction. This symbiotic relationship is a continual play of mutual tension, recognition and dependency. As boundaries between art forms become more seamless and permeable and as new technology places production within reach of an increasingly sophisticated audience, participation art gains more acceptance. Since participatory arts are incomplete without participation from the audience, more studies must be undertaken to understand the needs of the audience as they are purely voluntary partners and are able to make or break the project. To cater to different groups, the project shall not be designed to be excessively bureaucratic. It must able to communicate and interact within a broad and diversified audience about issues directly relevant to their life. Moving forward, the state of art at this stage is best summed up in the words of Allan

Get Access