Parties Against Full Inclusion For Children With Disabilities Essay

1106 Words5 Pages
Parties Against Full Inclusion
According to the latest figures available from Data Accountability Center, U.S. Department of Education, 2,415,564 students were identified as having a Specific Learning Disability in the Fall of 2010 (“Full Inclusion”). With the severity of the number of individuals with disabilities in the school system, the controversy of the best way to support them arises. One of the solutions of this controversy is the issue of full inclusion. Those opposed to the idea of full inclusion fear that the approach may impede on the children without disabilities and put a strain on the students with disabilities. The major stakeholders against full inclusion also fear that the process will negatively affect the teachers, as well as, the atmosphere of the classrooms. Many of these parties and individuals are not fully against inclusion all together, but do not support the idea of full inclusion.
Author Sharon Cromwell states that she does not want to completely eradicate inclusion as whole, because to “oppose inclusion would seem to advocate exclusion.” One of Cromwell’s articles, called “Inclusion in the Classroom: Has it Gone Too Far?” grew in popularity since she wrote it in 1997 her paper was on the Education World website in 2004. In the article, she supports inclusion, but she opposes full inclusion. She fears that the acts of full inclusion will put a strain on all of the individuals involved. In her article, Cromwell states that many of the “major
Get Access