Party Identification-Influence Voting Stereotypes

Education is a noticable factor to consider when examining voter turnout. Those who are less educated about politics and their rights don't vote because they simply don't understand the imporatance of their vote in the first place. The more interested a person is in politics obviously the more likey they are to vote. Wealthier people are connected and constantly encouraged and reminded that their vote is important by community leaders and politicians. They also feel as if they have more at stake when it comes to taxes and public services, therefore they feel they have more reasons to vote. Whereas people with lower incomes are underepresented, disappointed and feel like nothing seems to change, the rich just gets richer and the poor gets poorer. The same applies for the age difference amoungst voters. Older people are more politically invovled than the younger voters.

It listed in the article that only 38% of people between the ages of 18-24 voted in 2012, with a total percentage of people who voted being 62%.That being said if you lower the voting age to 16 the percentage of voters is going to decrease.

Many Americans don't vote because they think their vote doesn't count. This is a common excuse that's rooted in the belief that the Electoral College chooses the President, not the voters. In reality, the popular vote in

Both Republicans and Democrats have unequivocal pockets of political support. When running for office, votes come from various sectors of

Campaigns in politics are important in determining outcomes and inform the voters who remain undecided. Also, campaigns matter because although the candidates or media officials may know what the outcome will be, the voters themselves do not (107). Aside from campaigns, conventions are also important, if not more important. Party nominating conventions affect the apathetic, uninterested electorates who think conventions are interesting and exciting, often known as the Olympic games of politics (121). This experience for voters can carry influence, and is a time of “intense political learning” (129). Therefore, aggregately, conventions make public opinion meaningful because the citizens who watch make an informed decision about a candidate, and have facts about why they will vote for that candidate. The chief reason why individual public opinion is meaningless during presidential elections is the “nonattitudes.” Nonattitudes are survey responses made up on the spot during an interview by a respondent who has no attitude on politics (113). Therefore, these individuals diminish the value of public opinion because we hate inconsistency and this creates an abundance of views on issues. However, during election night, exit polls support why aggregate opinion is also important. Exit polls are meaningful because one hundred percent of those leaving the polls have voted (102). Therefore, we can get real results from the electorates and this makes collective public opinion

Lastly, another reason people do not vote is simple; they are not educated. They don’t understand how the government system works. TCHI tells that “Texans were not aware about even voting” (Texas 21). Most Texans are not informed about what the politicians are offering either. This will result in an overwhelming feeling for whom they will be voting. This is why it is essential being informed and educated about

Furthermore, in her review "Burdening The Right To Vote: Assessing The Impact Of Mandatory Photo Identification Requirements On Minority Voting Strength,” Kristen Clarke discusses how requiring photo ID’s can greatly affect African Americans and Latinos and their participation in elections. In his article "Lower Voter Turnout is seen in States that Require ID,” Christopher Drew also discusses some of the inconveniences possibly causing potential voters not to vote such as having proper identification or being unaware of further requirements needed when arriving at the polls. Both political parties have completely different views on the real purpose of some of the voter restriction laws and requiring photo ID’s which would be one more obstacle

A large majority of the previous presidents have fell into similar categories across the board. They have been republican white males in their 50’s who are attorneys from the east coast. Though they all have very similar demographics, the specific qualities and beliefs they possess have the potential to effect the nation.

Non-Hispanic Whites make up forty-three percent of the voting age in California, but are seventy percent of the state’s likely voters. Anglos consistently have high voter turnout, partly because of their composition among demographics that actually vote more often, including the educated, the older generations, and the affluent.

The article by Huddy, Mason and Aaroe centers around partisanship, and specifically which approach, of expressive and instrumental, affects campaign involvement more. It looks at four studies comparing these models and how different stimuli affected different people in regard to their emotional and physical support of their party.

In our world, there are many social issues to discuss about that affect the way we live our lives. One particular issue that’s significant is the voter turnout of young people during the 2014 mid-term election. So my question is why do young people not vote as much as the old? Well I checked my sources and I discovered some intriguing facts. During the mid-term election, voter turnout was the worst ever since World War 2. It was rather disappointing and pathetic for the youth of America. People between the ages of 18-29 represented only 13 percent of the votes. On the other hand, the old were much better as people between 45-64 represented about 43 percent. Another interesting statistic is that

There are lots of different ways the public can get involved, for example: joining pressure groups, attending demonstrations, participating in petitions, writing to an MP, standing as a candidate, joining a party or just simply voting. Despite the multiple ways in which you can get involved the participation crisis is becoming apparent in recent years, as in 1950 there was an 84% turnout where is in 2015 that number has dropped to 66% and in 2001 the general election saw the lowest turnout ever, being only 59%. The average turnout of local elections and EU election is 35% but it’s not just elections being affected by the participation crisis, party membership is also rapidly declining. In the 1950s, conservative membership was approximately 3 million and labour was 1 million, now in 2015 those numbers have dropped to

this low voting rate was attributed to a general lack of feeling of responsibility. As young adults age, marry, and become parents, their sense of community and responsibility increases, while their apathy toward voting decreases, (Abramson 116). Another reason for low voter turnout numbers for 18 to 24-year-olds is their generally low levels of party loyalties. Not having strong party ties decreases one's incentive to vote.

The second reason is the lack of interest in the political process. A majority of young voters (62% as cited in the passage) show disinterest in the political process and, as a result, don't vote. Plus,

Also people may not be well educated in elections and don’t feel comfortable in voting. Another reason why people may not vote is because they do not like any of the parties and what they pledge for so decide that they might as well not vote. However, in countries such as Brazil non-voters may be barred from receiving wages or taking professional exams. To me I think this is determination for Brazil for them wanting to have a good