The Similarities And Differences Between Henri And Villanelle

The author achieves her goal. For me the book is written very clearly because of its simple yet descriptive vocabulary. For me this book is the most interesting and entertaining book I have ever read on this topic. If I could change one thing in the book it would probably be to add some visual aid, although the book is still amazing without pictures. This book for me is an 8/10. I would recommend this book to anyone who loves a suspenseful and entertaining read. The book is intended for anyone who is mature and likes fiction

In my opinion I thought that this book was a very good book. In this chapter I will describe the setting, theme, plot and conflict etc. This book had a few different settings like

The author’s style of writing is straightforward and to the point and the novel is unique because it is written through the different perspectives of the four main characters. The switching of perspectives throughout the book is what made the book so hard to put down. I could see, compare and contrast how the characters themselves feel about the situation. As this goes on, the reader can comprehend the characters’ personalities better and their view on the other characters. If this story was written from just one point of view, one wouldn’t be able to figure out each character’s thoughts and perception of people around them.

I found this book very interesting and well written because the author did a good job of incorporating pervious events and background information with main events and interesting facts about Brunelleschi. This book restated how serious the arts were in the Renaissance, how people lived then, how much changed took place, and the Florence was a main place in the Renaissance. Another thing I noticed was that the author supported the subject of the book very well, he didn't only state facts strictly about Brunelleschi, but also about the different sides and how life was during that time. Because of that I found the book to be very interesting and enjoyable because it made me want to keep on reading to find out what Brunelleschi had to go through and what his inspirations were to do this. I also think that the author incorporated a lot of

There were a few points in this book that taught me about life and how crazy it can be sometimes. The photographer named Fulgencio was very afraid of hitch hiking to Mexico City with a stranger, especially with all of us expensive equipment. On the ride, Fulgencio is so paranoid that the guy is going to kill him, he grabs a machete out of the back of the truck. In doing so he gets kicked out of the car and loses all of his photography equipment anyways. This taught me that we need to trust each other more, Just because there are a few crazy people in the world, we shouldn't let them give us all a bad name. I mean, the guy picked Fulgencio up when he was in desperate need of a car, and gives him a ride. He should have been thankful, not picked up a machete and threaten the guy. Another thing this book taught me was that just because your sister doesn't want your kid anymore because she

This book is a very good book. It is not one of my favorite books, but it is in, or somewhat close to, the top ten list. It has an intriguing story and has some humor in it to make sure that it isn’t all mellow.

Another thing that I liked about the book is that at the beginning, the wake/vigil/funeral was so accurately described. Funerals are awkward, tiring, and numbing. Meursault

For the most part, the novel was very enjoyable. One aspect of it that I loved was that the storyline was extremely intense, which always compelled me to find out what would happen next. For example,

I think that this work is a very well put together book. Even though In the earlier questions I make it sound like a ten on ten this book is not. I rate this book a 9/10 for the soul reason that it was on a very directed path and you could the events that were going to happen before they did by just reading the book. Even the twist that the author put in were not that book which made some of the book predictable and who really wants a book in which they know everything that is going to happen.

This book, was never to my liking, I always wondered why Mrs.Silva always talked about this book. I was never interested in reading really long books, my mind always would drift off but this book had something about it that was connected with me!

First, I found it hard to follow at times. I think it would have been easier to understand if the chapters were shorter and more broke up. Although this book included lots of details like the thesis was proving about the sex scandal, I feel that some details were unnecessary and not needed. The book also jumped back and forth between people and topics which made the book harder for me to understand. Improvements could have been made in the layout and structure of this book. In my opinion, I think the author included more background information at the beginning of the book. To me, this book seemed hard to understand and follow. It skips back and forth between years and events that make it hard to

In my opinion, the author, Ruta Sepetys, moves the novel in an interesting fashion. I liked how there are many characters and how there is a lot of things happening. The author kept the reader interested at all times throughout the novel. The author, Ruta Sepetys, who writes historical non fiction books just as this novel, was born the daughter of a Lithuanian Refugee which may have influenced her to write this very novel. It is geared in a positive way due to Joana, a main character in the novel, helping to portray this with her nursing skills. Seeing the book in the Character of Joana’s eyes affects the overall novel in many different ways. Some may be on Joana’s good side and others may be on her bad side.

There were a few things about the reading that I didn’t exactly enjoy. La Cruz’s writing style is quite different from most that I have read. Her sentence structure is sometimes very difficult to follow being she incorporates many commas, semi-colons, and adverbs. This adds length to the, already difficult to understand, sentences and causes me to sometimes forget the subject matter of the actual sentence. Also, she constantly reminds the Bishop of how insignificant she is and how magnificent he is. I cant tell if she is being serious all the time or if she is being sarcastic in some of her statements. She also begins a lot of her sentences with the word “and” which I have always been taught never to do.

2. Keep a plot summary of these chapters. Briefly and in your own words, recount what happens but also make sure you establish how a particular chapter functions in the work as a whole. A well-developed paragraph will suffice for this part. The novel introduces Leonce Pontellier who s a vacationer on Grand Isle — a resort off the coast of New Orleans. He leaves a boarding house for his own cottage after annoyed by a parrot. His wife Edna and her friend Robert Lebrun return from their swim they took in the Gulf of Mexico. He soon departs to play billiards and socialize at the Klein Hotel. Edna and Robert continue to chat after Leonce leaves. They talk about their backgrounds. Then while Edna gets ready for dinner Robert hangs out with her children. Leonce tries to figure out what Edna’s problem with boys is. He figures out that she is different than the rest of the women on Grand Isle. Madame Ratignolle is introduced and she is the perfect image of the “mother-women” in the Creole society. Edna has differing attitudes from people like Madame and this leads Leonce to think she is a disappointment. Madame often makes references to pregnancy as Creoles do which shocks Edna. Madame sews the children’s winter clothing while Edna sketches and talks with Robert. Madame gets a fainting spell and Robert and Edna quickly fan her, she recovers quickly, returns to her cottage and Edna and Robert go on their daily swim. Chapter six mainly

Any literary work is unique. It is created by the author in accordance with his vision and is permeated with his idea of the world. The reader’s interpretation is also highly individual and depends to a great extent on his knowledge and personal experience. That’s why one cannot lay down a fixed “model” for a piece of critical appreciation. Nevertheless, one can give information and suggestions that may prove helpful.