Making a scientific discovery is very rare, but what this student that goes to the University of Brookside made a historical discovery that can go either good or bad for the people of the earth. Over the month of November, Ayesha Patel was secretly working on a medicine that will keep animals from going extinct.
She was experimenting with a few human medicines that might work for animals. Her goal was to make a medicine that would keep all animals from being dead. She mixed Advil ( medicine for the human to keep calm and decrease a cold) and Tylenol ( also a medicine to keep away cold but with a completely different formula) to make a mixture medicine that worked for animals. She experimented on a dog that was her’s. She injected the mixture
This has changed the way researches study new information and almost eliminates the possibilities of harming human
In, “Dog Lab”, Claire McCarthy is a student as Harvard Medical School. She is strong willed with a drive to become the best doctor. Upon hearing about a “dog lab”, she became interested in what the lab had to offer. During class one day the professor introduced the lab, in which students were required to perform an operation on a living dog. This shocked McCarthy in the sense it would require her to go against her morals. This would teach her a Signiant life lesson of having to do something against you believe in for the betterment of something. McCarthy explains “The lab took all day. We cut through the dog’s skin to find an artery and vein, into which we placed catheters. We injected different drugs and chemicals and watched what happened
Medicine is evolving every day, changing the lives of many, taking care of who is sick, helping who is about to leave this world. New studies are created by biotechnology scientists every day, trying to help who is in need. Each one of this medicines is tested before being available to the public. However, the way that these drugs are tested is what creates criticism. Testing uses animals as tools, objects, they get mistreated.
The author did this to show the conflicting sides of having a scientific animal in your home and also to show the conflicting sides of animal testing.
exposed animals to a single large dose of wormwood oil each. Dogs that were experimented on
It’s no secret that sometimes great discoveries come as a result of really big mistakes. But are they always worth the problems they cause? Are mistakes key to discovery? Some say mistakes are key to discovery, while others vice-versa. This essay will cover why mistakes don’t usually lead to discoveries, and how they might not be worth the mistake if a discovery is made. Most discoveries come from research and studies, not from mistakes as most people think.
Eyelash extension program from the well known semi-permanent makeup Korea definitely adds to your present lashes. It's a pretty straightforward method, where fake lashes are attached to your natural eyelashes. These lashes are most organic and lightweight to make wearing them more enjoyable to wear and hardly visible. Eyelash extensions boost how your lashes appearances by giving them longer and thicker. They are also curled to provide you the appearances as if you've just come out from the salon.
Scientific discovery is always exciting. Whether it’s stumbling upon something entirely new to explore, or pushing the boundaries of existing technology, science will forever offer us interesting revelations. Learning to harness the full potential of technology through study can lead to great things… or it can lead to disastrous misuses of power.
Significant discoveries often challenge an individual’s perceptions and ideas. This fosters a unique lens of perspective which can lead to renewed and intensely meaningful understandings of ourselves and the world around us.
Today’s society is focused on the affects of diseases on the human body, and how to prevent the side effects associated with the disease. The controversial topic of using animals as research subjects is highly debated of whether it is necessary to save lives or inhumane to the animals. Every year, animals are experimentally used to determine the effectiveness, side effects, toxicity and safety of medications. Personally, I was aware of the testing being done on animals, but did not know much about it, and was therefore indifferent in the debate. However, after doing research, I have come to the conclusion that the cons outweigh the pros and animal testing is inhumane.
Animal experimentation plays an important role in today’s medical and pharmaceutical advances, but many question the morality of such a use of animal life. Whether one argues that testing different products and drugs on animals is necessary or not, this has become an integral part of developing products. From that Tylenol we pop to get rid of our headache to that perfect shade of pink lip gloss, animal testing is used in order to produce the simplest household items. Today, in the United States, it is federal law that requires all pharmaceuticals, food additives, cosmetics, and garden chemicals to undergo a
There is a massive debate going on about whether animal experimentation for experimental drugs should be legal or not. Both sides question whether animal’s lives or America’s knowledge is more important. Several claim that animal testing is needed because many lives can be saved with the awareness that is gained from each test. Others do not agree with these people. They believe that animals should not be hurt because their lives are just as important as humans. One way to resolve this issue is to use the many alternative ways that are being developed to test experimental drugs.
If not made carefully, drugs and other substances can be extremely dangerous. In fact, over 70% of medicine-related Nobel prices involved animals in one way or another. Animal testing helps researchers to determine how safe the drug is before-use. For example, Richard Lower figured out the maximum safe amount of citrate for a blood transfusion on a dog, performing the first-ever successful blood transfusion. Even
Passage two, paragraph 11, the text states," Thalidomide was successfully tested on animals and marked as natural sedative for pregnant woman... As a result babies were born with shortened or no limbs at all." This states that animal testings can lead to terrible results. Animals do not always react the same as other animals might to a certain drug or vaccine , so it could lead to disaster effects if not testing correctly or on the appropriate species. Passage two, Paragraph 10, the text states that," Many substances that adversely affect animals will not effect humans.... For example bread dough, garlic, and chocolate can kill dogs and cats." This shows that things that we humans can eat can be lethal to other creatures. So the only way to know if drugs, vaccines, and cures work is by testing them on the same
In the early 1920’s animal experimentation was crudely developed for testing and evaluating products and medicines. Animals, such as rodents, are injected with certain medicines or fed specific ingredients found in these products. Many results from these testings include pain and suffering for the animal experimented on. I believe that animal experimentation should have restrictions. These experiments can be important in discoveries relating to cures for diseases and other medications, but many animals are being harmed for the cause and treated as objects that can be used and disposed of.