Paternalism : A Country 's Economic System

TOMS Shoes is a most humanitarian organization; they are a for – benefit business with a major heart. The organization was established by Blake Mycoskie in 2006. Mycoskie set up the organization after he saw outrageous destitution in a few nations including Argentina as a hopeful of the "Astonishing Race Contest" on CBS Television. Amid this occasion he saw villagers youthful and old who couldn 't bear the cost of a solitary match of shoes. In mid 2002 he found the agreeable and one of a kind ranch shoe worn by local people known as the "Aspartate". (TOMS.com) Mycoskie formed a shoe after this style, one that was adaptable, strong yet great and comfortable and had them fabricated in Argentina. At that point Mycoskie came back to the United States equipped with the shoes and a commendable mission. His central goal and one of a kind business proposition included approaching retail locations to offer his TOMS shoes, then for each match of TOMS sold he would give a couple of TOMS to a youngster in need. A Los Angeles boutique, American Rag, had confidence in the story behind the shoe and turned into Mycoskie 's first retail client. "Amazingly, that end of the week gathered him $88,000 in requests. Two years after authoritatively building up TOMS Shoes, the business had "$9.6 million in income." (TOMS.com)

Toms has expanded its product mix significantly since the company began in 2006. They have always been keeping an eye on what their target market was interested in and catering the products to fit what

Movements such as Black Lives Matter and the gay rights movement have gained rapid popularity in modern society. This spike of interest in social justice in pop culture has created a “fad” in which celebrities, public figures, and regular citizens feel an underlying pressure to support social justice movements which alter rights for large demographics of people. And while the cultural trend of social justice becoming a fad creates the illusion of a more progressive society, the truth of the matter is that the popularity of such movements can be detrimental to the cause because it gives the false appearance of universal acceptance when the stigma against oppressed groups is still prevalent in society. Indubitably, fads will fade, which is especially threatening in the case of social justice, which has a much greater consequence once the popularity surrounding it disappears. Removing the illusion of progress and calling out the hypocrisy behind those who feign support for their own personal gain and popularity can counter the insidious nature of the social justice “fad.”

For every pair of shoes that is bought, Toms donates a pair to a child in need. This one for one program became popular among customers because Toms made their customers feel like they were making a direct impact on the lives of those in need by simply buying a pair of shoes. Additionally, the story of how Toms was started was unique which is another reason why so many people fell in love with the company. They challenged the orthodoxy that people in third world countries are stuck in their ways, by providing shoes to kids so they are able to go to school and get an education. Since their creation, Toms has expanded to eyewear, bags, and coffee to provide services such as sight saving surgeries, safe child birth to mothers in rural countries, and clean water. They challenged that it is possible to make a difference in the lives of people around the world by simply purchasing products consumers usually

Explain why government regulation is needed, citing the major reasons for government involvement in a market economy.

Founded on democracy and freedom, the United States’ very roots are being attacked. Although the transition has been passive and nearly undetectable, America’s fundamental beliefs in the freedom of the individual are gradually being modified. As government intervention continues to burgeon, American citizens’ rights are beginning to diminish. This is noticeable through the implementation of federal health care (known as the Affordable Care Act) and the overall increase of government involvement in regards to the lives of its people. This results in a reduced ability for laissez-faire capitalism, which literally translates to “leave alone” in French—an economic theory in which the economy is run without the government’s involvement. While no

In its conventional sense, cause-related marketing is a formal agreement between a nonprofit organization and a business to raise money for some specific cause. Hence, such agreement is very beneficial for both sides since one of them actually gets the funds, while the other builds a positive image to increase the customers’ loyalty. Despite all the advantages, there are definitely some disadvantages. For example, too strong efforts to improve the face of the company through NGOs sometimes results in the challenge of exploitation. Still, in regard to TOMS Shoes, this particular outcome is not dangerous because this model is different from the typical cause related one. TOMS combines both sides in one company. That is, they do not need any beneficiaries because they are their own beneficiaries. Simultaneously, they are the actual business, built on the charity for

Since its foundation, the philosophy and business model that Blake Mycoskie enforced in his company, has truly made a name for the company and himself and today, the way TOMS do business, speaks of social responsibility. Mycoskie created a vision where the company give a pair of shoes to a child in need for every pair it sells; he named it the “buy one give one” campaign. For Mycoskie, the ability to make the company profitable is just as important as social responsibility. As he explained in an interview with CBS News, he felt very motivated to help communities in need after he learned that many kids were not able to attend school because they did not have shoes, and also because diseases in many countries are transferrable through the soil

Karl Marx developed his ideology as a means of enabling all people to obtain the necessities of life. Marxism embodies the belief that communal sharing ultimately maximizes society’s welfare. The masses willingly accept this simple doctrine; it builds on Catholicism’s central ideal of universal human dignity. In practice, Marxism fails and will continue to fail because communal sharing contradicts simple human nature, reduces the productivity of societies through a significant loss of incentives, and shares the historical precedent of coinciding with oppressive totalitarian systems. In contrast, capitalism rewards those individuals who operate more efficiently and results in the overall advancement of society. As a result, the unintended consequences of Marxism result in its inevitable collapse.

Let’s now turn our attention to the core elements of paternalistic leadership. In this section, we will explore the core framework of paternalistic leadership style, before analysing two core theories of motivation that drive the framework. At the end, we’ll also explore the two separate strains of paternalistic framework: benevolent and exploitative models.

The role of governmental regulation and control in long-term care are based on two major reasons: The government is the major payer of Medicare, Medicaid and other public health programs and as such, most residents in long-term facilities are covered by one or both of these programs. The government also take advantage of the above leverage position to intervene and monitor financial expenses as well as the quality of care provided. Also, the nursing industry provides care to the weak, fragile and most vulnerable individuals in the society. Many of these individuals are either mentally and or physically disabled and unable to care for themselves. Thus, “the government role in regulatory long-term care to protect the vulnerable

When Gorbachev made an attempt at economic reform, introduced in 1987 as Perestroika, it was not enough to revive the economy and reverse the period of stagnation and excessive military spending that was crippling the economy. If anything, it made it worse. Perestroika introduced a free market economy, essentially the basics of capitalism, and aimed to improve life for Soviet citizens and working conditions. In theory, the reward of working was meant to stimulate the people to work even harder, which in the end would aid the Soviet economy and revive it. This was far from what happened. The new economic system did not have enough free market elements, causing for the failure of businesses and supply shortages as there were still price controls in place. As profits were limited, production fell, just like in the oil crisis mentioned prior. What Gorbachev devised aimed to keep basis of the Soviet economic structure, but modernize it with aspects of a free market economy, yet it was not enough of a change to revamp the economy. The true ramifications of Perestroika were seen in the USSR’s last few years; inflation was through the roof, the GDP had declined and was continued to fall at an alarming rate, there were shortages of food and clothes, and overall living conditions had greatly declined. While it shortages of goods were not uncommon to the Soviet public, Gorbachev’s policy brought on shortages of basic goods and necessities. He aimed at fixing the economy,

Paternalistic libertarianism, defined as “the idea that it is both possible and legitimate for private and public institutions to affect behavior while also respecting freedom of choice, as well as the implementation of that idea.” (Wikipedia). The term paternalistic often takes the idea that someone is looked after by another as a child may by their parent in a way that is for the looked after individuals benefit. So together, with the term libertarian, it suggests that the freedom of choice is given with the aid of an entity whom guides at a groups discretion the most beneficial choice. Ideally, it’s a concept that can mean anyone is informed of the best choices while maintaining the ability to refuse. In all it’s a fantastic idea that could and would work for many situations. What are the implications of this ideology when it comes to the continued problem of organ donation shortages that plague the modern world and from what of the current systems in place can we take away to reduce if not solve the issue?

TOMS Shoes are their handiwork of Blake Mycoskie, a young entrepreneur whose business model has put a new spin on corporate social responsibility. Mycoskie has built a company that"s winning both sales and hearts by giving away a pair of shoes for every one that is sold through its business.

There have been many political and economic ideologies that have adorned or stained this planet such as fascism, anarchism, monarchism, collectivism, communism, capitalism, syndicalism, individualism, socialism, authoritarianism and many hybrid ideologies. The ones we will be talking about in this essay are capitalism and anarchism. Both have existed and spread the extent of its influence, with the former rapidly gaining traction during the industrial revolution and becoming the ideology that rules nearly all the political and economic spheres of life on this planet as of modern times. They are both freshly adopted ideologies that have come into the limelight just a couple hundred years ago. The fact of the matter is that anarchism is less defective of an ideology and more concerned for the welfare of the people.