Pathos, logos and Ethos in Aristotle´s Rhetorical Triangle Essay

In class, we have discussed rhetoric, discourse communities, and the importance of properly conveying a point. While my professor, Mr. Larry D. Huff, does not seem to believe in the “rhetorical triangle,” we have had successful discussions on the ways we can prove a point using ethos, pathos, and logos. I successfully joined a discourse community and learned its respective ethos, pathos and logos. My sophomore year of high school, I auditioned and was accepted to the theatre department of The High School for Performing and Visual Arts and joined a discourse community which changed my life. The bumper sticker stretches across the entire back window of my car. Regardless, I am proud to have it for what it represents. This essay will explain the importance behind my sticker.

According to Aristotle, ethos means that the persuader convinces someone else of their character or credibility or appeal to ethics; pathos means the persuader convince the audience of an argument by creating an emotional response or appeal to emotions; and logos means that the persuader is persuading an audience by reason or appeal to logic. Ethos can make a person sound fair or unbiased, person could also introduce their expertise or pedigree, and a person could use the correct grammar and syntax when it comes to using the appropriate language. Pathos can make an audience feel sympathy from the persuader or to make them

There are many different ways that writer tries to connect to their audience or try to get their point across. The three major ways a writer does this is through ethos, pathos, and logos. Ethos is any way the writer takes a reference or a quote from an expert with the same point of view as them to help build their own credibility. Pathos is words that can completely change the way the reader feels about certain way about a topic. Logos is anything that is logical and can be proven by statistics.

In the article “Don’t Blame the Eater” written by David Zinczenko he argues that children suing the fast food industries may not be entirely wrong for doing so. He goes on to advocate that fast food companies neglect to fully inform their consumers properly. Throughout his arguments, he uses the different forms of rhetorical analysis to emphasize his point. These persuasion techniques allow us as the reader to see the article with further clarity. One of the persuasion techniques he uses is logos (logic), this is the act of stating facts, evidence, and reasons. The next persuasion technique is ethos (credibility), he briefly educates us on his current occupation which allows us to trust his words. Lastly, Zinczenko uses pathos (emotion), he appeals to our emotions and feelings by giving

Brainwashing, torture, pain. All three of these words bring about a negative connotation. However, rearrange these words – reintegration, discipline, moral instinct – these words now have a conclusive argument against methods that may seem heinous. By enhancing these words, one can change the emotional and logical appeal of an argument. In reality, stubbornness and pride hold humans back from the truth of reality. Therefore, two groups with different options can cause conflict. To unify two opposing groups, either a compromise must be made or one group conforms to the other. Either method can work; however, to get this to work an emotional and/or logical appeal must be made in an argument. This method is commonly known as pathos and logos (two of Aristotle’s Rhetorical Situations). Pathos, from the Greek origin, means “suffering” and/or “experience”; but not as suffering from pain, but as feeling sympathy from a story of suffering. Logos is translated to “logic” and “reasoning.” By finding reasoning in a situation, it is easier to see the difference between just and unjust. Through the use of manipulation and torture, O’Brien demonstrates the methods of pathos and logos behind his assertive argument.

Aristotle wrote that we can be persuaded by three things: reason (logos), the character of the speaker (ethos), and our own emotions (pathos).

Aristotle defined three parts to being an effective communicator: ethos, pathos, and logos. Ethos is the credibility that a speaker or a writer brings to the subject that he or she is communicating about. Some people are able to gain more trust in certain areas because of their experience. Logos is the appeal to reason, to the forcefulness of a well-thought-out and well-structured position. It uses facts and solid evidence to get a writer’s point across. Pathos is the use of emotion in debate or argument. This is used a lot in visuals such as advertisements or videos (Losh, 44) In William Wilson by Edgar Allan Poe, the narrator, who calls himself William Wilson, enrolls in a school and meets another student that looks and acts exactly

Logos is the use of logical appeals to persuade the audience. With deductive and inductive reasoning, logos is an effective and persuasive way to back up a claim and reach the readers. Pathos, on the other hand, is the use of appealing to one’s emotions in order to persuade. The language and tone the author portrays in their works helps to convince their audience and reach them through their emotions.

Contents include Ethos, Pathos, and Logos. The author ()also mentions Ethos focuses on credibility. To obtain credibility, provide your bio and examples of your work. Pathos focuses emotion. Sometimes emotional appeals help to persuade. Logos focuses on Logic. Enough evidence, reasoning, and data is the most effective for persuation (212). The audience usually suspect a person who they meet for the first time. suspition prevent them from concentrating the message, so credibility is important. Some audience are likely to empathy, so emotion is useful although it depends on the contents. Logic is

In addition to appealing to the rhetorical appeal logos, I also tried to build credibility and trust with the reader, hence using the rhetorical appeal ethos. To do this, I tried to

Aristotle is given a lot of credit for developing the basics of the system that forms the rhetoric. The rhetoric is regarded as the most important work that was written on persuasion. This rhetoric was never meant to be published but it was instead a collection of notes by his students from his lectures. It shows the development of his thoughts in two periods while Aristotle was in Athens. Aristotle developed the rhetoric in two phases, first when he was in Athens and the second phase when he was head of his own school which was called the Lyceum. According to Aristotle, rhetoric was seen as a means or as a way that was used to manipulate others by not stating facts and also messing around with people’s emotions. Aristotle is the one who identified rhetoric as one of the key elements alongside with logic and dialect. The first line of the rhetoric is that, ‘rhetoric is a counterpart of dialect’. He says that logic is the key that is concerned with reasoning to reach scientific goals while both dialect and rhetoric are the parts that are concerned with probability. With this, he said that these three elements were the ones that were best suited to human affairs. Dialect as a tool for philosophy is a way for skilled personnel to test their knowledge so that they can be able to learn.

Aristotle's source of credibility consists in Logos, Ethos and Pathos which are three completely different textual elements, yet they all associate. Ethos moves an audience by proving the credibility of the writer; Pathos

The Three appeals define the idea of persuasion throughout a piece of literature. Throughout an argument, the elements of Logos, Ethos and Pathos are present in some fashion. The use of Logos focuses on the persuasion through evidence aspect. An author who understands that they have the Matter of Fact and Policy on their side typically uses logos. Logos is typically not something an author strives to use, but is apparent to the reader.

Many people and organizations use writing and visual methods to persuade readers to their view. In such pieces, the author will use many different tricks and appeals in order to draw the reader to his or her train of thought. According to Andrea Lunsford in her instructional book The Everyday Writer, these appeals can be broken down into three main types – logical, emotional and ethical. A logical argument uses facts, statistics and surveys to back up what the author is saying and is commonly referred to as logos. An ethical argument is one that tries to build up the authors characters and prove to the reader that the author is qualified to give his or her views on the topic at hand. Ethical arguments are commonly called ethos. Finally,

In Aristotle’s Rhetoric, Aristotle argues that rhetoric should be used to portray the truth and to persuade people to follow the truth, not to manipulate the audience. According to Aristotle, rhetoric is both a natural method of persuasion and something that can be learned. Aristotle says, “ordinary people do this either at random or through practice and from acquired habit” (Rhetoric). There are three modes of persuasion, logos, ethos, and pathos, each used in a unique way. “The modes of persuasion are the only true constituents of the art: everything else is merely accessory,” according to Aristotle (Ibid). For rhetoric to be effective each mode of persuasion must be used correctly - ethos to exhibit ethics, logos