Pay For Grades

Everyone does their job. Construction workers construct, teachers teach, and judges judge. Students learn. And if everyone works- whether it be in an office or in a school- why not pay students? Well, that's actually a bad idea. Paying students for their grades like you pay an employee is a bad idea in the long run.

    First off, school requires a mental effort which by definition is considered to be work. Since we go to school for 8 hours every day and do that about 180 days per year, we should get paid if we keep our grades up because it’s hard to do. Keeping good grades requires lots of hard work and effort. It also requires time, which some of us

Kids do not always focus on their studies, however, having excellent grades is important. Not only will paying a kid for their grades motivate them, but also make them feel pleased with themselves. I think kids should get paid for their good grades, it will be very helpful to kids in the

The general argument made by Arianna Prothero in her work, “Does Paying Kids to Do Well Actually Work,” is that incentives may help boost students to come to school and learn so they may earn a further education. More specifically, Arianna believes that financial incentives have a huge impact on students rather than little rewards. She writes “Incentives are also more likely to work for students who need a little improvement to earn a passing grade.” Schools that use incentives have a better chance of teaching more kids as well as more of them learning what they really need to at school; new material.

The general argument made by the author Arianna Prothero in her work ‘Does Paying Kids to Do Well in School Actually Work’ is that paying students for grades only works for students who are already doing well within their classes. Throughout the article, the author was appearing to be neutral about the topic. Prothero uses the statement “the effects are small if even there at all” to emphasize the point about the incentive only working for students who are almost there. These pupils are the students who only need to put in a small amount of work and effort to achieve this reward.

Giving your children money for satisfying grades that they get doesn't benefit them with their career that they will have as adults. Let me back this up. If they get paid for the super grades that they received they will soon have an expectation that everything good that they do they should receive something in return. This makes kids not try to the best of their ability because these children know

The general argument made by Arianna Prothero in her passage, Does Paying Kids to Do Well in School Actually Work, is that incentives, such as paying students to go to school, will improve the way they learn. More specifically, she believes that financial incentives affect students rather than little trinkets or toys. She writes “Incentives are also more likely to work for students who need a little improvement to earn a passing grade.” In this passage, Arianna is suggesting that more schools in the U.S. should start providing incentives but that are designed well or else they will not work. So, does paying kids to do well in school actually work?

Would students be able to improve their grades if they were getting paid? Money is a great reward for most students and it could possibly have a long term effect on students. They are always wanting their grades to be improved and then they would have more of a reason to study for test and quizzes if they were getting paid do go to school. Students would be focused at school if their was money to be made by going to school. Teachers would also not be stopping as often because of students getting of track. I believe students would improve their grades if they were getting paid because, Money could have a long term effect, and more student could need a little more motivation

“Why can’t our hard work have an income?”. Almost all students have had a similar thought at a time in their lives. To them, the incessant striving and vassalage they do for school deserves a salary. However, the situation with the exchange of grades for payment is a problematic state of affairs. In the predicament of schools giving students this opportunity, it will certainly lead to catastrophic events for all parties involved, especially, in the long run. Insightful to the statistics and evidence of both standpoints, school payment for grades is a situation best abstained because it causes quagmires. In agreement with this, say it causes conflicts, it’s only short-term, and causes negative impacts in the long run. By not paying students, you avoid turmoil, cut out a short-term motivator, and allow their future selves a better chance academically.

Being paid isn't the solution to helping kids want to learn but it’s a push toward that goal so in the future they will know learning is more than getting paid to do something every

To begin with, students should not be paid for exceptional grades, as a result it robs their feeling of accomplishment. According to “Parents paying their children money for excellent grades is a horrible idea”, by Gisler and Eberts, “ Many parents don’t realize that giving money to children for grades robs their feeling of accomplishment.” This means, giving children money they only do their work if they’re getting paid, and they don’t learn as much. The effect of this is that they don’t get that feeling of them doing their work all by themselves with nothing supporting

Motivating students with money has reached Washington DC area from their effort. The author thinks maybe it's not so bad getting paid for good grades. He thinks it doesn't hurt to try new things. He stated about his daughter getting paid for good grades and she started doing better. But , that's not the only thing they want to do with the money of portraying students to do better. They also want to use it to train teachers and give students more time to learn. I intend to also use this source to help formulate my arguments about if students should be paid for good

Why should kids get payed for good grades, because it will motivate them to try harder so they can get money. If you leave it at a $5 and they ask for more you can tell your children that you will just not give them any money at all. If you can’t get your children to do what you want then take away their things one by one. They can’t argue because they should know better than to talk back. Not only do you have the upper hand but you are also one step ahead of your kid. If they save up their money from the good grades they might buy you something on a special day, and we all know a parent will want a gift every once in a while.

I think that kids should get paid for having good grades for one reason. I am a student and I think that if we would get paid for making good grades a lot more kids would try. It is kind of like a job. You have to work hard so that you don’t get fired. If the kids were getting paid for good grades, then by the time they got out of high school they would have money for college, a car, or if there not going to college they will have money to rent a house.

We use it for many things, and paying people to do what they’re supposed to be doing, shouldn’t be included. Research shows that the money might be spent on better things we know can help improve student achievement, like better teacher training. This proves the fact that money should be put into better ideas and plans, so the student can be taught well and make good money in the future, instead of being paid to do the bare minimum now. Despite that, it’s not just the fact that the money can go elsewhere, many people feel very uncomfortable with the fact. For example, according to the National Phi Delta Kappa poll, only one in four americans say children should be paid for good grades. Many say the practice is wrong, and like I said before, think the money can be used for better things. This data shows that many are against the idea of being paid for good grades because it could be put to better use. For example, helping poor communities, which therefore shows the next