Payday Lending Is A Convenient, Instant, And Short Term Option Essay

The world is full of financial hardship, and American society possesses a great deal of controversy concerning lending. Unfortunately, short term lending, such as payday loans or title loans, creates a structural void within American society. According to Wikipedia, “Structural inequality is defined as a condition where one category of people are attributed an unequal status in relation to other categories of people” (wilipedia.com). When working class Americans apply for a payday, the unequal status between upper and middle class possess a bigger separation financially. The never-ending process of a short term financial fix becomes lifelong debt. Thus, middle class society becomes lower class society. Eventually, working class society will struggle to say above the poverty line. In addition to an imbalance in society classes, short term lending targets consumers who life paycheck to paycheck. In Rigging the Game by Michael Schwalbe, the author explains the reproduction of inequalities. Schwalbe discusses the different kinds of capitals human, social, and cultural (10). The three capitals unknowingly shape Americans social system. Many businesses capitalize on these capitals knowing no laws or regulation exists to stop them from capitalizing on individuals who no faults of their own were born into these unfair capitals. As a result, short term lenders possess the ability to have extremely high interest rates and outrageous fine print penalties because there is little

The main problem that most critics have with payday lenders is that many people recycle their loans and become trapped in cycles of debt. Some people use the loans irresponsibly or get loans from multiple lenders to buy things that they don't need or to enable unhealthy personal habits. These loans were never intended to be used in these ways, so some people get in trouble. The same holds true for all kinds of

I am going to look at one of America's most resilient industries. The Predatory lending better known as Payday loans, and even sometimes pass as car lenders and mortgage lenders. One in twenty households have taken one out at some point. And is estimated to be a nine billion dollar industry. With payday loan outlets are all over the place. The ethical question comes into place. When you question whether if receiving one of these loans can be a benefit or drag the person signing into the loan deeper in debt. Im very interested on this subject because I believe that payday loans can be very useful and benefit the general public, if we put in place very specific laws and restrain what lenders can do making sure that there is

According to CareerBuilder.com, a whopping 61% of American households lived paycheck to paycheck in 2009. That number is huge, especially since only 49% lived that way in 2008, and only 41% in 2007. Whether it is due to losing one or both household incomes or simply a reduction in the household incomes, the statistic is staggering. With families not able to adequately save for any unexpected expense that may arise, they are finding that more often than not there is more month than money. So what happens when the rent/mortgage payment is due, groceries need to be purchased, and then the car breaks down? For some, a small personal loan at a local bank is all it takes to get back on track. For many though, this isn’t an option, and they

The purpose of this report is to inform you, the RSGs, about how the ethics of payday loans should be considered before moving on with your project. After you raised many concerns about whether or not ethics are an issue, Vice President Bette Davis decided to bring the CRC in to help out here. Davis wanted me to research the issue of the ethics of payday loans, and report back to her on with the information I found in order to help her decide how to resolve the issues between the RSGs. I first wrote a memo to Davis on how the CRC could help with doing the research and writing the report. I then wrote an annotated bibliography to Davis explaining the sources that I would be using and how they would be beneficial in the final report. I then presented to you about how this would help you resolve your issues. After you approved of what I had to say, I wrote an outline for the final report and submitted it to Davis. After completing all of my research, I have come to my conclusion and will inform you about it in this report. It will help you to come to a consensus on whether or not the ethics of payday loans are an issue.

In the article “Me, The Other Scott, And Payday Loans” by Scott Gilmore, the author is furious to find that most people are being drained out of money they don’t have. In my opinion, I agree with the author. I do not think it is right for Payday loans to be tricking people with little to no assets to pay for an amount they cannot pay back. According to the article, annual percentage rate is more than 540, while loan sharks charge double that. Loan sharks will gladly extend the loan for two more weeks, that way they can charge more interest rate. Stan Keyes, the president of the Canadian Payday association argues that “It is unfair to calculate the interest rate this way, since the loans are typically for two weeks. However he concedes that

Unlike in the past when we have tried to influence legislators, we would target borrower stories toward the public. This strategy would start with ad campaigns of our consumers explaining how payday lending was their only choice and helped them provide food, water, and housing for themselves and their families in times of need. Eventually, we would shift the campaign to social media with the goal of personalizing payday lending for Ohio residents. We know that over one in ten adults in Ohio use payday loans and have positive experiences, but many in the public do not recognize this. If someone’s cousin, neighbor, or friend were to share their experience it would be significantly more likely to sway opinions than just another ad from “rich” payday lenders.

Americans who need a short term loan to repair a car, fly quickly to a stick relative beside or catch up on child care payments even find themselves going to payday lenders ether online or trough one of the thousands of payday lending store fronts. (Wherry) using online is a way to pay or catch up with your due date of the payment that you owe. Having someone that can help you with a payment is a payday lender that can help you with a car payment also paying your rent or buying food or also buying a new sofa. Nationally borrowers spend roughly 8.7 billion per year on payday loans fees and what might start as a 500 lifetime can become a heavily burden. (Wherry) having a borrower that lend you a loan can be easy but it’s time to payback that is when it became complicated. Also having a fee is very complicated because they pressure you to pay back when you miss your due date. Annual interest rates for payday loans typically run between 391 and 351 percent a cording to the center for responsible lending and most people who use them end up paying more in fees over the course of the year than they originally received credit. (Wherry) annual rates are very high in percentage because of lending tem money and not paying back on the due date. Having these huge percentages are too much but when you borrow more than you need the more you ending up paying than the last

In the newspaper article, Me the Other Scott and Payday loans, Scott voices his opinion that payday outlet companies are on the edge of committing fraud. Payday Loan companies constantly feed off of those families living with low to middle income, who can barely afford continuous asset payments, leading to advance payday loans being the only possible resort. Payday loaners are just skimming legality lines when over charging interest rates to those who are in desperate need. Those who have no other choice eventually have to pay off the loan plus an additional cost to borrowing the loan in the first place, falling into a continuous cycle of debt. The government sets up those living in lower to mid income to be trapped in a never ending cycle

The article “Payday Loans”, written by Scott Gilmore express his opinion on payday loan interest rates. His beliefs are that the interest rate is extremely high for people in society. After considering all Gilmore’s points placed in his opinionated article, I can grasp that I share the same opinion as him. The interest rate is too high for people and there should be a cap put in place by the government. With regulations put in by the government, it is believed to benefit society in which is considered still high. The government believes that an annual percentage rate of 540 is reasonable for everyday working people. In fact the newly in placed interest rate is double the amount charged from loan sharks.

Payday loans generate lots of controversy because they 're offered to people who have bad credit or limited credit histories, which makes them high-risk borrowers. Traditional lenders seldom approve loans for these types of borrowers and never quickly enough when a cash emergency occurs. Unfortunately, many of these same people don 't use payday loans as intended -- as short-term emergency loans just until their next paydays -- so they become trapped in a cycle of debt. Well-meaning consumer activists, politically motivated legislators and establishment figures from the traditional banking industry band together to push for reforms to regulate payday and other short-term loans more closely.

With payday lenders out numbering other local stores and restaurants it is allowing them to be at every corner in low-income neighborhoods making it convenient and pushing banks out of the area. For example, straight out of the book it describes how McDonald’s has only 13,500 U.S. restaurants, Burger King has 7624, Target has 1,250 stores, Sears has 1,970, J.C. Penney has about 1,000 locations, and the entire Wal-Mart retail chain includes about 3,600 U.S. outlets. All of these combined 29,000 locations are fewer than the nation’s 33,000 check cashing and payday lenders, just two sectors of the fringe economy.

It is also important to recognize how many low-income families are unable to escape poverty due to the lack of protection from the hidden implicit fees or “poverty taxes” that burden those struggling financially. Many of these costs stem from the practices of payday lenders who capitalize on the impoverished and their inability to procure loans from traditional banks. When needy individuals possess poor credit scores or lack ample savings, their inadequate financial histories prevent them from taking out loans from conventional banking institutions. Consequently, when a situation arises where an immediate credit-blind loan is required, they are forced to turn to these independently run subprime lenders and their excessively high interest rates.

Quick, easy cash: payday loan companies are enticing individuals with flashing signs on thousands of streets around the world. Skyrocketing interest rates with percents in the hundreds are drowning out low to moderate income civilians within months. Whilst the Conservative government held power, they lifted a usury law that banned interest rates higher than 60 percent, allowing payday companies to be exempted from any criminal sanctions. Consequently, the industry took advantage of the opportunity immediately: interest rates raised as high as five hundred and forty percent. With two week loans, approximately a quarter of the loans default. Although while average companies see this as a disadvantage: payday loan industries feed on consumers

If the company unlawfully overcharges clients on payday loans, there could be lawsuits from those clients. Knowing that there could be potential lawsuits from providing payday loans, it should be taken into consideration while the two sides come to a consensus. This would bring a lot of negative attention towards the company, which would ruin their reputation. This is what happened to a well-known payday loan company in Ontario, Canada called, Cash Store Financial Services Inc. They let their clients exceed the amount that they are allowed to borrow and added additional fees to opening credit or debit cards instead of hiking up interest rates above the maximum amount. They owed $10 million to their customers, and in 2014, they