Paying College Athletes

College athletes bring in a lot of money to their schools and to the NCAA. Do to college athletes bring in a lot of money and not getting a dime of it, brings up the idea of whether or not college athletes should be paid. Many coaches are debating the topic of paying college athletes. Paying college athletes is a highly debatable topic.

College athletics is a billion dollar industry and has been for a long time. Due to the increasing ratings of college athletics, this figure will continue to rise. It’s simple: bigger, faster, stronger athletes will generate more money. College Universities generate so much revenue during the year that it is only fair to the players that they get a cut. College athletes should get paid based on the university’s revenue, apparel sales, and lack of spending money.

In my opinion, “The Problems with Paying College Athletes” makes several great points. The central argument of the essay was questioning where the money to pay college athletes would come from. Apparently only fourteen colleges turn a profit from NCAA without relying on institutional support, like student fees. The fourteen colleges that do turn a profit can afford to pay student athletes, but a majority cannot. For the colleges that cannot find the funds to pay athletes, how do they compete against the colleges who can?

In light of the outbreak of scandals and bribery occurring in college athletics, the average person would most likely agree that paying college athletes would escalate the desire for extreme NCAA neglect, which would be an extreme job in all aspects. However, there are even more efficient problems to consider. For example, how much should college athletes get paid and what will those payment increments be chosen by? What if a student-athlete on scholarship ends up with a severe injury halfway through their sporting season? What if a student-athlete does not end up being as superior as thought to be and, although still remaining on the team, does not start or even play at all? These are all problematic things that should surface far more questions. According to College Express, it has been shown that only a fraction of Division I football and men’s basketball programs turn a profit. The other Division I football and basketball programs, as well as baseball, softball, golf, hockey, women’s basketball, and just about all Division II

With college basketball and football originating in the 1800’s, the game has had much time to adapt. Over the years, the sports have become more and more popular, gaining a bigger fan base, which has resulted in substantial profits from the sale of merchandise representing the teams and players. There is one thing that has not changed; all of the athletes are still not being paid. The National Collegiate Athletic Association, or NCAA, is an organization that regulates most aspects of

College sports are one of the largest and fastest growing markets in today’s culture. With some college sports games attracting more viewers than their professional counterparts, the NCAA is one of the most profiting organizations in America. Recently there has been controversy in the world of college sports as to whether the college athletes that are making their universities and the NCAA money should receive payment while they are playing their respective sport. Many believe that these athletes should be paid. Others argue that they are already receiving numerous benefits for playing that sport from their universities. Many of the proponents of paying college athletes are current or former college athletes who believe their hard work and hours put into practice and competing go under appreciated. They feel that while the athletes are making the university money, the athletes do not receive any cut of these profits. Opponents feel that athletes already receive numerous perks and should not receive extra compensation on top of the perks they already receive.

College athletics; two words that make most people in the United States of America go crazy, two words that make kids dreams reality, two words that make millions of dollars every year. These words can cause people to love and hate each other. Countless numbers of people and hours of time go into college sports. The top of the collegiate sport food chain is football. Every Saturday 40,000-105,000 people wake up and start their day off early at the stadium, eager to watch their favorite team play four quarters of a game that the country has fallen in love with. A division one football game, like Oklahoma University, brings in a tremendous amount of money every Saturday and year after year brings a big profit back to the university. Where does all of this money go? Who should it go to? Should it go to the players that all the fans come to watch play?

The NCAA is a multi-billion dollar industry that generated over $845 billion last year due to their players’ ability to entertain and perform to their fullest extent at all times. So with all of this money flowing in, why wouldn’t they provide their athletes a stipend? Well that’s a question that today baffles many. What they basically have in place is a corporation that makes tons of money and, oh yeah, they don’t have to pay their employees. Sounds like the perfect business model right? What has continued to be one of the most pressing issues in the world of sports today has now become a matter the NCAA can no longer afford to ignore. The service that college athletes provide to the institutions they attend in addition to millions of spectators all over the world is still not being rewarded in the manner that it should be for their above-average dedication, work ethic, and most importantly money brought in to their employer.

Over the years, the popularity and marketability of victorious teams have brought enormous sums of money to their colleges. College athletics, especially the so - called “revenue sports” of men’s basketball and football, is now a multimillion-dollar business that is marketed, packaged, and sold in the same way as other commercial products.

Most student-athletes playing a sport in college are there on an athletic scholarship. The scholarship is granted to them by their respective schools and is worth anywhere from $50,000 to $200,000. According to Edelman, the football program alone at University of Alabama brought in roughly 143.3 million dollars of revenue. In perspective, that’s about 2 million per player. Even though Alabama is an elite program and brings in more than the average football program, the NCAA brought in nearly $845 billion in 2011 per Sonny. Now it is obvious there many ways a university brings in revenue, but it is safe to say that a player is worth more than that $100,000 scholarship. In fact, a substantial share of college sports’ revenues stay in the hands of a select few administrators, athletic directors, and coaches. Now think about what college athletics would be without the world class athletes it has today, or without any athletes at all. If a school didn’t “award” athletes these scholarships, there would be

College sports also known as the greatest source of entertainment known to man this era. There are several types of sports ranging from non- physical to the most physical contact sports. Each sport takes sacrifice and dedication to be able to perform at your best knows matter what level. The NCAA is a million dollar business that lets student athletes show their athletic ability and skill toward other individuals. That is the main reason for the creation of collegiate sports, but not to downside the meaning of entertainment. Controversy of paying these athletes is a big deal at the moment. There have been many scandals of athletes receiving direct pay under the table that is not included in their financial aid or scholarship. Paying the

Do you often go to college football or basketball games? In his article “NCAA Schools Can Absolutely Afford To Pay College Athletes, Economists Say” Strachan believes that colleges should pay their athletes because they deserve to be paid. Strachan believes this because as economists say most if not all institutions can afford it, “But when it comes to whether the NCAA…. can afford it, the answer appears to be… yes”(par 27). According to Strachan, “They’re nonprofits, and their incentive is to spend every cent that comes in”(par 9), if they have extra money they should just give it to the players, for bringing the college even more publicity and money. In Strachan’s view, it “shouldn’t be surprising”(par 27) that we have enough money to pay

Over the recent decades, school games have picked up tremendous popularity over the United States. Whether it be football, ball, or hockey, since the time that the turn of the century, intercollegiate games have accumulated a surplus of income to their individual Colleges, and also expanding the notoriety of the School 's notoriety. For instance, in a study directed by the Orland Sentiental, it was evaluated that the College of Texas ' Sports System had the most astounding income of some other College at $120,288,370 (Robbins, Josh). Yet with this expansive whole of cash, no school competitors are lawfully made up for their work. As indicated by NCAA standards, "You are not qualified for support in a game on the off chance that you have ever. Taken pay, or the guarantee of pay, for contending in that game" (NCAA Regulations 1). Because of this law, not just are school competitors experiencing issues in paying off their school educational cost, additionally numerous players are generally paid under the table through underground markets. These novice competitors have no impetus to stay in school and completion their individual degrees, as numerous can 't bear to pay for the undeniably costly school experience. While numerous contend that school competitors shouldn 't be paid as they are simply novices speaking to their schools, I contend that players must be paid to spare the authenticity

Over the last decade college sports have generated more and more money, for themselves and the conferences they’re affiliated with. Division I college sports, most notably football and basketball, provide a huge source of universities’ income. The schools generate revenue from selling tickets, their various television contracts, and merchandise that supports the sport programs, along with many other sports related revenue builders. The athletes however, get a scholarship and not much else. While the thought of getting a free ride through college is something not many people would protest. When the issue is more carefully examined, however, it becomes obvious that it may not be enough. Universities are manipulating athletes, and recently the problems that this creates have become more visible. Many athletes are skipping out on school early and taking their talents to the big leagues to make money. Over the years there have been some reports that boosters as well as alumni pay players while at school. Additionally, some players have been suspect of backroom dealings with gamblers to alter the outcome of a game. Some problems could be minimized, or better yet eliminated, by coming up with a program to pay these college athletes. When you really look at it, these athletes are taken advantage of by their schools, who in turn bring in hundreds of millions of dollars. With the way the system is, many college athletes unknowingly commit violations, choose to leave college early, and

College and universities are cheating student athletes out of millions of dollars, “Schools like The School of Alabama brought in 143 million dollars and that is more than any NHL team and 83% more than NBA teams.” (How Much Do Money College Sports Generate) Today in age many people enjoy watching college basketball, football, and other sports. There is a whole month dedicated to college basketball. Colleges and universities have problems with how they pay their athletes. A lot get scholarships and products from sponsors, but they are not commonly paid. College-Athletes are using sports as a job considering the time and effort they put in to going pro. These students have little time for another job and need a way to make money. The NCAA and