Paying Students for Grades

If students are rewarded for quality schoolwork, grades may initially improve. They may show more excitement. However, in the article “Why You Shouldn’t Pay Children for Grades” by Amy Mccready, it is found that the enhanced grades deteriorate along with the excitement for the payment. Most children simply lose interest in the reward. It is better to just let youth accomplish

    Why do almost all students dread school? Though the answer may differ between different people, the main reason why most students dread school is because we have to go to school almost everyday and work, receiving no reward. There is nothing to look forward to in school and though the idea may sound absurd, students should get paid for good grades. School is work, it’s difficult and it takes up our entire day, filling the rest of our free time with homework or topics to study. If we got paid for doing good in school, then we would be encouraged to keep up the hard work and we would put more effort in school. Meaning that the next generation of adults would be well educated and would benefit society in many ways. Getting paid for good grades would also help us see the responsibility that comes with money. It would also help prepare us for life after school because we would know how to spend our money wisely, so in other words, students should get paid for good grades because school is work, we would be more encouraged to be diligent and we would learn the responsibility that comes with money.

If kids do get paid they will like to learn more, they think going to school is a waste of time but when they do get paid they won´t think that anymore. kids don’t like school is because they think they don’t get anything out of it so if we do pay them they will work harder. In my opinion i

The general argument made by the author Arianna Prothero in her work ‘Does Paying Kids to Do Well in School Actually Work’ is that paying students for grades only works for students who are already doing well within their classes. Throughout the article, the author was appearing to be neutral about the topic. Prothero uses the statement “the effects are small if even there at all” to emphasize the point about the incentive only working for students who are almost there. These pupils are the students who only need to put in a small amount of work and effort to achieve this reward.

Giving your children money for satisfying grades that they get doesn't benefit them with their career that they will have as adults. Let me back this up. If they get paid for the super grades that they received they will soon have an expectation that everything good that they do they should receive something in return. This makes kids not try to the best of their ability because these children know

Would students be able to improve their grades if they were getting paid? Money is a great reward for most students and it could possibly have a long term effect on students. They are always wanting their grades to be improved and then they would have more of a reason to study for test and quizzes if they were getting paid do go to school. Students would be focused at school if their was money to be made by going to school. Teachers would also not be stopping as often because of students getting of track. I believe students would improve their grades if they were getting paid because, Money could have a long term effect, and more student could need a little more motivation

One time, I got a good grade and my grandma gave me money. If school is truly wants student to be motivated to do well in the school should pay student for a better grade. Motivate student prepares them for high school higher test score. From better graduation rates for learning about work making kids smarter there are many positive effects of paying student for a higher grade.

Why do students never have money? It is a privilege being a student in the United States because the amount of money necessary to pay all the expenses inside and outside of school is insanely high. According to the presentation made by Greg Gottesman of school loans in TEDx, it costs around three-million-dollars of student loans per year. Most students are not in a position to pay that amount of money; and as a consequence, they drown in debt for the rest of their lives. However, student expenses and its solutions can be classified in three different fields: necessities, auto expenses, and class expenses.

Motivating students with money has reached Washington DC area from their effort. The author thinks maybe it's not so bad getting paid for good grades. He thinks it doesn't hurt to try new things. He stated about his daughter getting paid for good grades and she started doing better. But , that's not the only thing they want to do with the money of portraying students to do better. They also want to use it to train teachers and give students more time to learn. I intend to also use this source to help formulate my arguments about if students should be paid for good

kids could save money for the future the schools they want to go when they grow up like the college or private schools, the books and the uniforms, etc if they save all the money they earn or if they can invert it in something that can earn them lot more, so they can have something really good in the future and in schools. Don’t you guys want your kids to subside in school? or in

Underperforming schools are a mess. The students don’t behave, get bad grades and bring down the school’s reputation. Schools like these are most likely to have not as many students succeed in graduating. They are the schools that have the run down playgrounds, old textbooks, and no technology. The Cash for Grades program is supposed to be a program that can end all of this. This program basically speaks for itself, it gives students the opportunity to earn money be getting good grades. Paying students to get good grades is a horrible idea. This is a bad idea because an enlargement in cheating would take place in schools, kids would start only doing things for money, and it is a waste of our tax payer’s money.

I am a kid myself. I exert myself not for good grades, but for a good future, and that is what is imperative here. The want for money, praise and prevalence will win out over our desire for money every time. Who is providing us with this money? Our parents? They already pay for our education. Students need to learn that they will need a fuel other than their parents' wealth as they become more and more independent. Grades don't always reflect competence, either. A child who is inherently bright needs to learn there is always room for improvement, whatever his or her report card says.

The source that supports the statement is “Greatschools.org - Edward Decic.” “The promise of external rewards, and the child’s natural enthusiasm may be dampened.”This mean that students that do receive pay for their grades will lose their natural enthusiasm. When students see that they are getting payed they will only care about the money and not learning. All in all, the student’s natural enthusiasm will dampen if paid.

It is another morning and your child is getting ready for school. If schools truly want students to be motivated to do well in school, then the schools should be willing to pay students for their hard work. Schools should do it because there will be higher graduation rates, prepares them for the real world, and higher test scores. Why should students have to work for nothing, they are basically doing a job. From better graduation,to preparing kids for the real world, to raising up scores, there are many effects of paying students for getting good grade.

Do you think that the school’s money should be invested in bribing students, or in improving the education? Some argue that cash motivates students, but great amounts of money are going into bribing students for good grades, when really, this money should be used to improve the education quality. Kids should not get paid for good grades, as it is a poor use of money and there are other motivators that can work just as well. This essay will explain some better motivators (in contrast to money), some more beneficial uses for the money, as well as explaining why some people think that cash is a good motivator.