Peace - from what source.? Essay

As Cierco(Source A) said to his son, “physical force… is characteristic of man.” Peace may last for some time, but differing views on complicated issues means fighting for what you believe is right. For example, the Cold War clearly supports this message because the US strongly believed in democratic values and they were fighting against the Soviet Union who desired to spread communism. The Cold War strengthened US politically because they maintained their democratic values and contained communism by helping out countries that were devastated after World War II. The US was strictly against communism because it harmed their democratic views and because this could not be solved through discussion, the Cold War was bound to happen. The US and USSR wanted to gain more allies through the spread of their own ideologies but, the Soviet Union clearly had a negative intent of spreading their power on the world. The US policy of containment weakened the Soviet Union because they were not able to spread communism and therefore led to the fall of their empire. This shows that war can either strengthen countries or weaken countries who abuse their use of power. Action must be taken against countries who have a negative purpose of spreading their power and if not resolved through discussion, this means going to

War is Peace – If there was no war the citizens would not have peace, war is used as a way to control and regulate peace.

In all of Human history, only 8% of that time has been completely at peace. From 150 million to 1 billion people in total have been killed by war. That’s 150 million families at least who have had their loved ones ripped from their grasp. This is far too many. War is unnecessary and barbaric. In “just and unjust war” by Howard Zinn the complexities of whether or not a war can be called just or unjust are debated. Peace can be achieved. the three crucial steps toward making world peace are education, open communication, and human rights laws must be strictly enforced.

In the movie Miss Congeniality, all of the contestants are asked what they wished for. Coincidentally, all of the pageant contestants replied confidently with ¨world peace.” That famous line has now turned into a well-known punchline due to how stereotypical and obvious it is. All joking aside, that is actually what everyone strives for in their lifetime. World peace has unfortunately been absent in past occurrences. For example, blacks were greatly mistreated by many in a harmful and unkind way. Back when slavery was present, kindness was absent. Despite all of the past happenings, hope for a more loving world still has a chance to prosper.

Throughout world history, man has been undoubtedly the most (self)destructive sentient species ever to grace the planet. In over six thousand years of civilization we simply have not understood how to live in peace. In modern times, powers such as the United States, the United Kingdom, China, France and Russia

nations, peace means respect for the rights of others”. The only reason that people, here in America

There was much destruction in the wake of the first World War. Millions of people had been killed or disablitated by this devastating war. Housing and whole towns were left in ruin with nothing more then rumble to mark where they had been. Millions of people were starving in German as a result of the Hunger Blockade. Needless to say it was time for peace but the ending of World War I wasn't all that peaceful as was hoped.

The Treaty of Versailles was intended to be a peace agreement between the Allies and the Germans, instead with the harsh end terms for Germany, it created political and economic chaos in Germany. By the end of the First World War, Germany had surrendered and signed a peace agreement. The task of forming a peace agreement was now in the hands of the Allies. In December of 1918, the Allies met in Versailles to start on the peace settlement. The main countries and their representatives were: The United States, Woodrow Wilson; Great Britain, David Lloyd George; and France, George Clemenceau. It had seemed that making peace agreement would be fairly simple. Once they started, the Allies began having different ideas about the wording of the

The end of World War II and the awareness of international society to the peace and security of the world does not fully vanish the warfare among nations. Even though the wars that currently happening are not as brutal as in the past, but it does not mean there will be no harm consequences. For example, during the Cold War between United States of America and Soviet Union did not perform any battlefield action. However, the tension between the two and allies has caused severe economic loss for the other nations. Both United States and Soviet Union were preparing all the necessary weapons to face unexpected physical battlefield, nuclear weapons, drones, flying bomber jet et cetera. This is one of the examples of nations declining the peace in literal meaning.

Peace should not equal war. Why do people think if someone wants peace they have to go to war first? War just makes it worst. A quote from William Whipper’s speech, “Non-Resistance to Offensive Aggression,

Humans have been around for hundreds of thousands of years, yet we are still unable to put aside our differences and strive for a common goal. This is why I agree with Harris when he expresses his lack of confidence in the future of humanity. If we have not been able to achieve peace by now, it is hard to hope for a better

Lately, it is nearly impossible to read a newspaper, read an article or even turn on your television without learning about the overwhelming amount of troubles that have plagued our world today. Contrary to our scientific development, it seems as though humanity has made hardly any advancements in the quest for world peace. The world as we once knew it is nearly gone and now the remnants of it can only be found in the precious reminiscences of the old, the dusted bindings of books, and the hearts of those who crave for society to return back to the way it was. Wars that use to be fought on enemy lines have now been brought home, governments that rose to power preaching democratic ideologies have grown to be totalitarian, and now more than ever,

Throughout the history of mankind there has come to be two factors that are seen as inevitable. The first is progress, humans are naturally competitive creatures who not only want to insure their own safety but also get one up on their neighbours. Progress has led to huge leaps forward, not only technologically but also socially. However, aside from progress there is another factor, war. Time and time again throughout history humans have fought and killed each other for their own selfish reasons and security. And according to political theorists such as Hobbes this is simply the state of nature, a perpetual state of ‘war of all against all’, further surmising that it is due to this that mankind is fundamentally selfish. However, just because so far, mankind’s history has consisted of an endless cycle of wars, does that mean that it must continue to be this way? Political Philosopher Immanuel Kant outlines a number of articles that he hypothesises could lead towards a perpetual peace. There are many criticisms of Kant’s perpetual peace, many argue that it is to idealistic and utopian. However, Kant doesn’t deny these claims. Instead Kant argues that if this ‘perpetual peace’ is even a remote possibility then for the good of mankind, we have a duty to try make it a reality.

Will there ever be a period of peace on the earth? What will it intend to you?

Human destruction, in the form of international disputes and war, is the most dangerous and probable form of the end of the world. It has the potential to envelope the world in a nuclear winter and destroy the earth’s environment. War constantly affects countries around the world, and has been for all of human existence. The chance that small disputes between two countries will lead to international warfare is extremely high – both world wars were caused by such circumstances. After the first and second world wars, the United Nations (UN) and the International Criminal Court (ICC) were created to mediate international disputes and uphold international law. However, these systems are ineffective and will ultimately be contribute to a