Peaceful Resistance Research Paper

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society because it arouses concern and opens the eyes of law makers and others who are obliged to follow them.

Martin Luther King Jr. Dr. King was a prominent voice on behalf of African-Americans in the fight for racial equality during the mid- 20th century. In one particular situation, Dr. King was jailed in Montgomery, Alabama, for protesting the unfair treatment of Blacks in the area. While in jail, King penned a letter to fellow civil rights leaders that were critical of his rebellious tactics. In the letter, Dr. King states that “the purpose of direct action is to create a situation so crisis-packed that it will inevitably open the door to negotiation.” Dr. King believed that the only remaining option in advocating for racial equality was to peacefully violate the law in order to bring about negotiations with lawmakers. Without Dr. King’s peaceful disregard for the law, African Americans would have had to continuously endure unfair treatment and persecution while drawing little relevant attention to their issues. This serves as significant evidence to suggest that Civil Disobedience is sometimes necessary in a society, as the non-violent actions of racial equality supporters led to civil rights negotiations in

One of the distinguishing principles that has separated American Democracy from the rest of the world is the right to enjoy immense and unprecedented freedoms, whilst still enjoying protections from government. American government has protected, and continues to protect, our unalienable rights, while many other governments have historically, tried to strip their people’s rights. Many of the rights we enjoy are used to keep our own government in check. The government cannot infringe upon our right to speak out against it, protest it in the streets, or write literature against it. All of these rights are important to maintaining, and controlling, our democratic system. The right to peacefully

In the 1950s till present day we still use nonviolent resistance to stand up for what we believe is right. Nonviolent resistant protests were one way for Civil Rights leaders used to advance their cause in the 1950s and 1960s. These protests lead to the Civil Rights act of 1964. This act outlawed discrimination based on color, race, religion, sex, or national origin. It starts with civil disobedience, which is the act of opposing a law one considers unjust and peacefully disobeying it while accepting the consequences. This was the case in some protests where they felt laws were unfair, unjust, and unconstitutional. I believe that peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society using the Montgomery Bus Boycott, The March on Washington, and the Salt March as my three examples of nonviolent resistance protests that positively impacted a free society.

Does peaceful resistance to laws positively or negatively impact a free society? I think that peaceful resistance positively impacts a free society. Many people used civil disobedience to prove a point in a situation that they believe needs to be changed. There are people such as Henry Throeau, Gandhi, Martin Luther King and Rosa Parks. Many people say that Henry Thoreau is the backbone to civil disobedience. Thoreau was arrested in 1846 for refusing to pay six years of poll taxes in protest of slavery and the Mexican American War. Thoreau believed that individuals could be free only if their actions were true to their own beliefs, with or without the support or approval of the community. Thoreau inspired Gandhi first and then MLK to follow, but these two leaders are responding to more pressing circumstances and responding as members of subjugated classes of people sharply defined by the social markers of race and ethnicity. Another important person who used civil disobedience is the same person who said "You must be the change you wish to see in this world" -Mahatma Gandhi. Gandhi used nonviolent civil disobedience to protest racial pass laws in South Africa and in India's Independence struggle, including the famous Salt

I think peaceful resistance to law positively or negatively impact free Society because it demonstrates that people are in their country to live for every name. Rosa Parks was an amazing example because she knew the long respected it but chose not to follow it when she sat in the front of the bus. Amazing Minds like Marther Luther King jr. Was also an amazing example that you can possibly save the things you want to say and he went to jail but he chose to continue to fight for what he believed in. Civil Disobedience by Henry David Thoreau is an amazing piece of work it shows people that you can respect it but you don't have to follow it in every aspect. In the letter to Birmington Martin Luther King Jr. Demonstrates that he can possibly write

Yes, peaceful resistance to laws positively impact a free society and history can speak for this. Martin Luther King Jr. is one of the most famous people to protest the laws of the United States. He believed the preamble statement

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society because when violence is involved, people fight one another and they don't listen to each other's voices, which leads to nothing getting solved.

In a good way. People who voice their opinion are the people who are responsible for the positive impact on society today. If people around the world never acted in such a way as in a peaceful resistance, it's possible that it would've taken a longer time for the world to form the society it has today; because people would resist but not in a peaceful manner. I believe that before people had the idea of a peaceful resistance and if people never took advantage of it in the past, that, that's when the negative impact on society comes in. I don't think that peaceful resistance could ever leave a negative impact on society in such a way that physical resistance would. A physical impact leaves room for terror and more violence and its a risk in such a way, that it would be an easy way to lose your life. The difference between a peaceful resistance and non peaceful one is the physical act. In a peaceful resistance, one is not fighting back in any harmful way to themselves or others. As opposed to a non peaceful resistance, people are simply putting their lives at risk for something they believe in; when one can easily do that in a much more safe manner such as a peaceful resistance. Which is another reason why I believe it has a positive impact on society. It gives the option to fight back but not physically. Being physical causes more of a surge and a riot full of angry people as opposed to non physical actions where people form protests and fight for what they truly believe in, (non physically), because they are determined and strong. They don't just fight because they are angry. That is one of the biggest differences as to why peaceful resistance is not a negative impact on a free

Peaceful resistance to laws is an important part of a free society because when the government isn’t doing what is just, then the public can bring awareness of an injustice. This resistance brings the community together for a common cause and for others it is coping mechanism. Peaceful resistance positively impacts a free society because it maintains freedom by keeping laws just.

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society, because one it leaves a good impression for the future. It can show that the world can be a better place one day. Some of the good people leading society will take it into consideration and make it a trend for others to follow. Men happen to follow higher representative men in society. One man that changed the world was Martin Luther King Jr. He proved the point of how it should be no reason for a man to hate on another regardless of the color of their skin. He preached that all men should be treated the same whether it is all people going to the same bathroom, eating together and putting up with one another. At this time alot of people ignored this accusation. He stressed this through a letter where he was placed in a Birmingham Jail for segration in public areas. It brings out in how Martin

The art of peaceful protest has been used all throughout human history which brought about the concept of Civil Disobedience; which says that it is okay to for people to go against the law while peacefully protesting. Many protest have followed in

I believe that a peaceful resistance to a law will always positively impact a free society. Rosa Parks did not agree with having to give her seat up to a white person on the bus. She refused to get up and was arrested. She didn't turn violent and hurt people, nor did she damage the bus. She said no, and remained sitting. After her arrest, she demonstrated peacefully by boycotting the Montgomery public buses. Although, it took time, the law was overturned. As an American you have the right to protest. You do not have the right to hurt other people and damage public and private property.

Is peaceful resistance good or bad for the society? Peaceful resistance is good for the society. Throughout history many groups and individuals have protested nonviolently, they have proven that peaceful resistance often has a positive impact on our society. There are many reasons that peaceful resistance is good for the society: it brings people together; it produces results without violence; and it can provide people hope for a better future.

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. Rather than having violent movements and harming citizens, it is better to peacefully resist. Once a violence is used, the resistance to the law becomes nulled. People tend to not follow a violence protester. Once a violent riot starts, chaos is everywhere. People forget what they are truly fighting for. They unconsciously run away with the fear of getting harmed and dare not to go back. A peaceful resistance on the other hand leads citizens to join and support. People are able to see what they are fighting for and their real intentions. They are able to stand and cause no problem to people passing by as they are showing their support through silent voices. Many famous activists and leaders are for nonviolence. Mahatma Gandhi, a primary leader of India’s independence