Pedophile Research Paper

Castration would serve its purpose if a convicted offender is sentenced to it. One man named James Jenkins had molested three young girls and right before he was going to be sent to a special facility, he took a razor and physically castrated himself. He stated that, “Castration has done precisely what I wanted it to do. I have not had any sexual urges, or desires in over two years. My mind is finally free of the deviant sexual fantasies I used to have about young girls.”(Sex Offenders: Will Tough, New Laws Do More Harm Than

There are numerous treatment plans for these young sex offenders. There is one treatment called the National Adolescent perpetrator network. Its stated as an offender they are accountable for their crimes. Meetings and social gatherings with one another are very suitable treatments. Of course, the main issue to stop offending is by stopping them from further abusing and making it a safer for public. The only issue with sex offenders is they will always have this

Child molestation and sexual assault is an ever growing problem in the United States today, but an even bigger problem is that these pedophiles are being released after only serving as little as one quarter of their sentence. In California alone (at the time the bill was first passed), there was an estimated 680 individuals on parole for molestation and other sexual assaults including sodomy by force with a victim under the age of thirteen as well as child molestation with foreign objects.

Is it ethical then to punish people who commit sexual abuse against children? Or should our approach be treatment not punishment? This is an age old debate, while there have been attempts to treat the 'disease' of pedophilia, there are exceptions to this treatment whom despite it do reoffend. Counseling, monitoring, medicating, and even chemical castration are some ways our society has developed to "treat" the biological and psychological side of the argument

Honestly, anyone whom is identified as a sexual predator should not be released from prison under any circumstances. But because many are, the mental and personality disorders would help to determine the duration of the sentence in the outcome.

You may be wondering well if children can possibly be cured what about adults. This is where much of science has blinders on. There is very little evidence to prove why adults commit such acts. Many myths state that it could be a result of childhood abuse or they have the want for as much sex as possible. There is a serious of test that the convicted go thru to figure out why they may have done it called a clinical sample. Some area these samples have

Where they will have hard time over coming it, and moving on. In order to stop these types of activities and the public becoming more victims of this crime, the criminal justice system have created new laws and regulation for future preventions. For example there is website for sexual offender, that website holds records of all registered sexual offender where they live. From example there, the public can see where they live and if they feel conformable living there. If someones been a victim, I doubt they wanna live near any of them, because of the fear of being victimized. That fear can impact victim, some children who were victimized are not able to share till they are older. The criminal justice system tried to prevent this act from occurring, by arresting, convicting, and punishing them. Some perpetrator are mentally not okay, which leads them this act. This is where rehabilitation programs are available to help the offender. As mentions in the article, “Rehabilitation, etiology, and self-regulation: The comprehensive good lives model of treatment for sexual offenders”, by Tony Ward has “reduced sexual recidivism rates from 17.4% to 9.9%” This happened because offenders received helped that actually help them like, like getting behavioral

Do you feel safe sending your children out in a neighborhood with registered sexual offenders? Is the government doing enough to protect our children and ourselves from these dangers? In 2003 78,188 children fell victim to forms of sexual abuse (Finkelhor). We should be protecting our children, “1 in 4 women and 1 in 6 men will experience some kind of sexual assault in their lifetime, also 67% of sexual assaults have victims under the age of 18,” ("Dru Sjodin National Sex Offender Website."). Nationwide, sex offenders were four times more likely to reoffend, and be rearrested for a sexual related crime. Because the recidivism rate is so high, and because we must protect our citizens, sex offender laws should remain strict.

Sex offenders tend to blend in to society virtually unnoticed until they offend or reoffend (Polizzi, MacKenzie, & Hickman, 1999). Currently, there is a large group of mental health professionals representing a variety of disciplines, including psychology, psychiatry clinical social work, counseling, and medicine, that continue to believe in the potential efficacy of treating sex offenders. Over the past decade, the sex offender treatment field has grown rapidly and the treatment of juvenile sex offenders is on the rise (Parks & Bard, 2006). The rationale for treating juvenile offenders is based on research which indicates that inappropriate sexual behavior patterns develop early and a failure to intervene and change behavior early often means that the offender will continue to escalate his/her inappropriate behavior, which could present an even greater danger to society (Ayland & West, 2006). Vivian-Bryne, (2004) suggests that professionals who treat adult sex offenders report that offenders who are incarcerated will eventually return to the community and therefore, therapeutic measures should be taken to reduce the likelihood that they will reoffend even if those measures have not conclusively been identified as effective. Sexual offenders may find therapy valuable because it can allow them to retrace their upbringing to help them identify and understand the roots of their

In the criminal justice system, it is hardly looked at as a disordered. People pass around the term pedophile as if it is just a label for those who commit sexual acts with children, not a disorder. The problem with this and the system is that it works more on empathy for the victim than on disorders.

Sexual assault is one of the fastest growing violent crimes in America. Approximately 20% of all people charged with a sexual offense are juveniles. Among adult sex offenders, almost 50% report that their first offense occurred during their adolescence. (FBI, 1993) There are many different opinions, treatment options and legislation to manage the growing numbers of juvenile sex offenders. In today’s society the psychological and behavioral modification treatments used to manage juvenile sex offenders is also a growing concern. To understand and determine the proposed treatment methods, several related issues will need to be reviewed such as traditional sex offender therapy methods like cognitive therapy and alternative therapies like

There are very few things that people agree on universally, however one of them is their attitude toward pedophiles. No other type of person elicits the same kind of reaction as those who prey on arguably our most vulnerable population. Pedophiles alone out of other sex offenders drive intense fear and anger into the public, so much so that they are the reason for Megan’s Law requiring sex offenders to register as such since 1994. More recently, the enactment of an “International Megan’s Law” that was voted on last year requires for all sex offenders to get their status added to their passports. The only issue with all of this is being a pedophile isn’t a sex crime.

The treatment for sexual offenders is done in a three principal approach which is cognitive behavioral approach, psycho-educational approach, and pharmacological approach. The cognitive behavioral approach gives emphasis on altering the habits of the offended relating toward sexual offending and “deviant patterns of arousal”. (CSOM) This means altering the daily habits of the offender which may be everything they had known previously to incarceration. The second principal of psycho-educational focuses on altering the offender’s state of mind toward their victims and attempts to instill the understanding of how they inflicted harm with their actions. With psychology there is never a set time on how long a set goal will be reached. Times vary between individuals and can sometime never reach their desired outcome. In conjunction with those previous principals the offenders are also treated under the pharmacological

Personally, my argument for this question is aimed more at repeated sex offenders. With one-time sex offenders, I would need to see the reasoning behind the logic. For example, some people on the sex offender list are on there because they had sex with their girlfriend while she was under-age. The girl may have consented, but because she was under-age, her boyfriend would be accused of having sex with a minor and then placed on the sex offender list. In cases like that, I don’t believe the male should be castrated. However, males who are known as repeated sex offenders should most definitely be castrated in my opinion. Obviously, if they are known to have raped, assaulted, or harassed others more times than one, they obviously need to be taught a lesson.

In the United States, required surgical or chemical castration is something that is not really considered as a form of punishment or a method of rehabilitation for sexual offenders. The reason for this