Peer Pressure Towards Negative Behaviour and Classroom Quality Effects on Academic Achievement

As children, we are taught to listen to our elders or any authority figure and obey their instructions. This was what determined how “good” we were. Obedience I can be described as “willingness to agree with the directions of an individual with authority”. As children, obedience can help with their development, socially and behaviorally. It helps an

Conformity and obedience are both social behaviors that are influenced by those around us and determines our behavior in social situations. When we change our attitude or behavior based on those around us, we are conforming to their behavior. When we obey what we are told, by what we perceive to be an authority figure, we are being obedient. Conformity and obedience can have positive or negative results on our lives, depending on the situation and the individuals involved.

Conformity refers to an individual’s behavior that is performed because of group pressure, even though that pressure might not involve a direct request. Many people want to think that they are conformist enough so that they are not looked upon as strange to others and nonconformist enough to demonstrate that they are capable of thinking by themselves. For many years, psychologists have been interested in human conformity. Usually when people are in groups, they behave according to how those in the group behave. That indicates that conformity can affect a person’s behavior and make a person do things that may be against their ethics, attitudes, and morals. The study of

Additionally, Spector (1983) utilised Rotter’s scale on 157 students to evaluate whether conformity is linked with locus of control. He discovered that participants with a higher internal locus of control weren’t as likely to conform only in circumstances of normative social influence, where people adapt in order to be accepted, whereas there was no significant difference between the two groups in situations of informational social influence, where people conform for their need to be right. (Deutsch & Gerard, 1955) This finding proposes that normative social influence

Within social psychology there are areas of behaviour which psychologists have been particularly interested in. These areas include conformity, obedience and social facilitation to name a few. Two key studies within the areas of obedience and conformity were carried out by Milgram and Asch (Billingham, Ladbrook, Standring & Teahan, 2008).

Learning obedience is an important part of early child development. Obedience is the main tool parents use to train their children. Through obedience your child will use things he or she needs later in adulthood that force obedience upon a child will soon create resentment within their children, which will eventually lead to rebellion.

Compliance refers to an individual’s response when given an instruction from somebody else. An individual is more likely to comply with that instruction if it comes from a person that is liked or if it fits in with own beliefs and opinions. Conformity is the process of going along with a group in order to be accepted or to fit in. Social pressure can cause an individual to change something about themselves like dress sense or what music genre they listen to just to follow the crowd. To add to that, another way why a person’s behaviour may change when part of a group is due to obedience.

General Topic: The research and experiments done in this study were about the “role of individual differences in the general desire for control in conformity situations”. The results from all of the three experiments were interpreted as a model for the motivational part of the desire-for-control construct (Desire for control is a need to have dominance over social situations to minimize the extent of power others have.)

The acts of conforming and obeying shape us significantly, whether we are conscious of it or not. They do so in ways that psychologists Solomon Asch and Stanley Milgram attempt to explain through their research. Asch touches base on the topic of conformity and discusses the ways in which group behaviors and social norms can influence the decisions an individual makes. On the other hand, Milgram’s focus is on obedience, and he studied it by measuring average, everyday people and their willingness to obey authority figures, even if it involves actions that go against their personal beliefs and morals. They have provided evidence through experiments, and with this information, it becomes easier to understand the world of politics, and how these

In human behavior, obedience is a type of social influence where a person submits to explicit directions or commands from an authoritative figure, assuming that the person would not have acted in such a way without such an order. This can be distinguished from conformity, which is the act of matching values, attitudes, and behaviors to group norms, and from compliance, which is behavior affected by peers. Obedience necessitates a hierarchy of power or status. The person giving the command must have a higher status than the person receiving the order. Obedience can be seen as moral, amoral or immoral, depending on the context.

The following essay will be about understanding what is meant by and distinguishing the differences between the terms conformity and obedience. It will show the evaluation of two key psychological studies which seek to explain why people do and do not conform, also with explanations of minority influence. Whilst seeking to understand the reasons why people obey authority, it will show an evaluation of Milgram’s study of obedience, discussing the ethical issues raised from the research and

In pyschology conformity can be descibed as an indiviual’s tendency to follow the unspoken rules or behaviours of the social group to which he/she belongs to or wants to be apart of. Many psychologists including , Jenness (1932), Sherif (1935) both experimented in psychology, investigating conformity and group pressure. However, perhaps the most famous conformity experiment was done by Solomon Asch (1951) and his line judgment experiment. (McLeod 2007)

Tyler focuses on two main theories of compliance throughout his book, these are the instrumental and normative perspectives. Although most of the previous research conducted in this area has focused on the instrumental perspective, this study utilizes the normative one. This allows for one to focus on what people regard as just and moral opposed to what is in their self-interest. People will choose to voluntarily obey the law if they view compliance as an appropriate form of behavior. This feeling of personal or normative commitment can involve personal

The study was important since it investigated the level of compliance among pre-schooled children. Compliance is a critical aspect that allows children to understand, follow and synthesize the instructions given to them by their teachers. Previous studies show that non-compliance is prevalent among children who are of pre-school age. Therefore, there is need to understand the prevalence of non-compliance among pre-schooled children to foster earlier interventions to enhance compliance. Children who begin their schooling with higher levels of noncompliance might not perform better in their academics since they have higher chances of neglecting instructions from their teachers. For this reason, enhancing compliance is a major concern for

Based on all the previously referred material, conformity is totally driven by social norms, norms that are not written but sometimes are more powerful than law; the way that a person conforms to society affects the level and type of his compliance to society’s requests. For example, if a person has as personal characteristic not to like altering his self-image/ presentation based on society’s preferences due to his intense belief in independence, it is possible that this person will comply more difficult because of external motivation instead of internal. On the other hand, this means that if a person has an internal compliance only to smile to people who knows and not to