Peer Review Essay Examples

“Let’s create an AIDS/HIV-free generation”, which is not only a slogan that was proposed by President Obama but also a goal that I would like to achieve on my future career path. My practicum project at the Department of Health and Human Services was to generate dataset of new AIDS/HIV cases in Houston/Harris area required by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, and then to use ArcGIS software to make a map describing the new diagnosed in Houston area. The final products can be spatially lined to other sources to enhance understanding of social determinants of health affecting populations impacted by HIV. This practicum experience let me realize that AIDS spreads so quickly is because most people have insufficient knowledge or misconception about the disease and prevention. Becoming a pharmacist to provide prevention service and educate people to improve their health and wellbeing is how I want to reach the goal of creating an AIDS/HIV-free generation.

According to current guidelines, a professional counselor must wait at least _____ years to engage in romantic or sexual relationships with a former client.

The thing that would make this essay more informative is explaining the in-text citations a little more. Sometimes you jump right into a source without introducing it first, that can get a little confusing as a reader. There were also a couple times that you ended the in-text citation, without explaining it. So, introducing and ending in text citations would make the essay more informative. There were times that I was confused because it went from talking about one source at the end of a paragraph to another source at the beginning of the next paragraph.

When I stop to think about the memory’s that I have made during my first semester of college; there are both good and bad pieces or times that present themselves. Often with many things there are gray areas, and writing would fall in there for me. I fortunately understand now that I have times where I can over look many of my writing flaws. Such as sentence structure! This by far was my biggest problem in this class, and I fully understand why. Personally I have times that will type up a paragraph and never notice the mistake. That is until someone points it out to me. It’s almost like my brain knows that something is wrong with it, but for some unknown reason it won’t register when I’m revising my paper. So as a writer I have realized that I need to take advantage of people around me and get their feedback on my essay’s; because

I also used many online paper editor sources to check for spelling errors and reviewed with my peers to check that my paper was cohesive. I had my mother proofread my paper. She felt that I managed to inform my reader on the situation very well throughout my evening. I also had classmates, such as Diana and Mandy, read through sections of my paper to ensure that I was comprehending the requirements similarly to the way they had. I also compared with those who received full points on sections I did not in order to understand what I needed to improve on to achieve full credit in that

I need my paper to be easy to read, so I applied all these tools. The more I revised my writing, the more grammatical errors I corrected. After the first draft correction, I learn there were words I took for granted and used them in my essay that had a completely different meaning. I made generalized statements and did not attach much evidence to support most of the claims I noted in my writing. To improve my writing, I search the Internet to note other people’s remarks about these essays. Since I did not want to be embarrassed in front of my classmate for use of grammar, I had to read more to write more clearly. I did not like the peer review because it will allow my classmates to see my grammatical errors and would think of me to be a horrible English language person. But because of these peer reviews, I tried to make my text simple so that everyone could read and understand my writing.

It was very to easy to have small mistakes in my paper. I use a couple grammar check websites to help me find any errors in my summary paper. I know that I have bad grammar so I use

However, there were some things I needed to work on. When it was time for class peer review checks, I received the same criticism for each of my essays. Especially, for my first essay, that I though was perfect. My peers, and my professor

My second paper had no title but would have been called “Singing for Masculinity”. This second paper highlights the frequent mistakes that I made because of no editing and not giving working overtime to put forth a quality product. During my first draft I had many comments on terrible syntactical errors throughout my paper especially on awkward sentence phrasing. An example was “...when some athletes join the choir it gains a different perception”. This sentence sounds like I am just talking normally. With phase “some athletes” I am not expressing exactly who these athletes are like football players. This sentence structure does not exemplify who I am as a writer. After reading all of the comments that were given to me, I started to learn

How many times have you rewritten a sentence in your essay because it was ineffective? Then, after you corrected that sentence you realized that you made a grammar or spelling mistake. Peer-review aids to avoid this problem. Getting feedback from classmates can also help eliminate any errors in the paper, and overall, it helps create a more creative essay.

Credible Research Articles. Throughout the course English 1A I have learned new skills such as, annotation, research, and identifying credible sources. One of the topics that has brought my attention was, how to write a true research essay. A verified essay, that can be trusted and used as an example or give advice.

What frightens me about a class that includes peer reviewing is not me reviewing others’ papers, but rather, their reviews of me. Because of this, I did not try to be too strict or too easy, and I tried to guide to guide my fellow peers along with questions instead of telling them a certain way would be better. At the beginning of my process in reviewing my peers’ papers, I decided it would be helpful to point out mostly grammar mistakes and syntax. For example, in John Silva’s essay, “A Fool with Good Intentions,” most of my focus was on correcting grammar although I briefly mentioned structure and meaning suggestions. The main criticism I had was that:

The peer review worksheet was a great help in providing us a guide of how to begin our meeting. However, prior to the meeting Tiana and I been communicating through email and exchanging our paper. We first touch base with each other, by asking how we are doing. For example, we express our thoughts and check to make sure we also did other assignments that was related to the course. Then, we answer each other questions regarding the paper. For example, the structure our paper, the contains, and our one on one. We discuss where we are at on our paper and what we still needed to touch up on. I shared her my peer feedback worksheet. Such as, her paper does make me feel like I was reading an article about personality disorder. She also shared me

I really do not have that much experience with peer review. The only time that I participated in peer review was high school senior English and English 101. And both classes really never focused or appreciated peer reviewing. With that being said, I really do not know how peer review works and how to make it successful. I have only ever traded my paper with good friends and have them tell me “it looks good.” Being that the past peer reviewing hasn’t been very successful hopefully I’ll learn to respect and find success in this writing process.

The article selected for review in this investigation is entitled "Perioperative outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting: Effects of metabolic syndrome and patient's sex." The