Peer Review My Peers Work

In The Everyday Writer, I strongly believed that chapter 10 “Reviewing & Revising” was most helpful as I could relate to some of its statements. I believed that by reviewing my work, I’m bound to discover mistakes. By doing so, I could make minor adjustment to my work. However, sometimes looking over my own work isn’t enough so, that’s where a peer reviewer comes in. A peer reviewer is someone who challenges your work. By doing so, they give me a strong sense of doubt as I tend to overlook certain areas yet, the peer reviewer that I came across didn’t really help.

Discussion Board—Your initial response will be a reflection on last week’s peer review process from last week. Explain three pieces of feedback and how you incorporated this feedback into your final draft. Also, did you agree with the feedback you received? Why or Why not? Then, respond to at least two peers. Compare and contrast your responses with theirs’. Did you see any patterns? Share your findings with your peers.

This is a reflection of my essay from module four where we did a peer review and feedback on our essay. I found this to be a really helpful and great assignment. It gave us an opportunity to have a peer doing the same type of essay give an outside view point. The feedback that I took into consideration from my peer was very valuable. I did not have a strong enough opposing viewpoint providing a negative view on censorship or a positive view of free speech. This was very good feedback and I feel that my peer definitely took the time to break down my essay and gave a great review. This was such an important part of the persuasive essay that the need to make sure I had a strong counter argument was important.

Likewise, the peer revision process was the calling out process I had grown accustomed to while playing lacrosse. I would read through all of the peer reviewers papers ensuring that the paper flowed well from paragraph to paragraph through relative context and use of transitions. I also focused on the unity of each paragraph and the paper as a whole. I always included ideas that the author could expand on throughout his drafts so that it would be easier for him to reach his required word count.

Make sure you have enough supporting evidence and each paragraph is well developed. When revising shift your focus away from yourself and toward the reader. The final element that will be helpful when continuing this course is knowing the amount of revisions needed depends on how you approach the task of writing. Revising is not the process of correcting spelling mistakes or punctuation errors. The last stage before publishing is editing & proofreading. Focus on effective sentences, make sure they have parallel structures and are clear and concise. Check word choice to make sure you are expressing the correct tone and using the correct point of view for your topic. Finally, you correct grammar, spelling and punctuation then

Peer editing has helped me become a stronger and more fluid writer this semester. I’ve never actually done peer editing within a familiar group before every paper, so having a specific day to read and comment on one another’s writing in detail has truly helped me formulate better essays overall. It has helped me not only to see small mistakes I’ve made, but how the reader or audience interprets my work. Aside from peer editing inside the classroom I’ve taken my papers to the writing center and you for advice and help. I think that through the use of these sources it has helped me to develop stronger claims, better fluidity, and coherency. By formulating ideal structures, engaging in peer editing, and creating reflection pieces, they have helped me generate overall better papers.

After a review I might sit right down to browse over their comments and use it to boost my essay. Enhancements embrace adding data or fixing descriptive linguistics mistakes. For instance, In the second paper, most of the peer comments were about adding citations from the original story, which helps clarify the idea and simplify it for the audience. Really after the implementation of the request and took their advice, increased the degree obtained. In return, I reviewed my colleagues' papers and wrote my notes to them on correcting some spelling errors, adding some ideas or adding some details to clarify their

How many times have you rewritten a sentence in your essay because it was ineffective? Then, after you corrected that sentence you realized that you made a grammar or spelling mistake. Peer-review aids to avoid this problem. Getting feedback from classmates can also help eliminate any errors in the paper, and overall, it helps create a more creative essay.

In the process in which I would revise my paper the first step I would take was to make sure the draft was a proper representation of the point I was trying to make. That means going through adding and subtracting parts of the paper that were not effective or off

Utilizing the peer review was helpful at times for finding small grammatical mistakes to improve on my rough draft for all the papers needed for this class. It also assisted me with my own abilities to help peer review someone else’s work. Seeing what others did incorrectly help fix my papers so that I wouldn’t make the same mistakes. It was also enjoyable to read other essays beside my own because reading the same essay multiple times was monotonous. When reading different essays, it aided my work because I could better critique my own

What frightens me about a class that includes peer reviewing is not me reviewing others’ papers, but rather, their reviews of me. Because of this, I did not try to be too strict or too easy, and I tried to guide to guide my fellow peers along with questions instead of telling them a certain way would be better. At the beginning of my process in reviewing my peers’ papers, I decided it would be helpful to point out mostly grammar mistakes and syntax. For example, in John Silva’s essay, “A Fool with Good Intentions,” most of my focus was on correcting grammar although I briefly mentioned structure and meaning suggestions. The main criticism I had was that:

You are correct stating educating patients on high risk behaviors such as IV drug use, sharing needles and unprotected sex greatly reduces the number on new cases that are diagnosed. One very important obstacle implementing this intervention is that healthcare “providers also have inadequate knowledge about viral hepatitis, often failing to provide at risk patients with viral hepatitis related services” (Ward, Valdiserri, & Koh, 2012, p. 559). Until we overcome improving awareness and education with the provider, reaching these at risk patients, then we can strengthen awareness in the community setting.

Third, a self-regulated peer review accreditation system is cost effective in relation to a government accreditation system. Although critics charge that the accreditation system is costly, creating an unnecessary financial burden on institutions, Eaton (2013) noted there is a lack of data to confirm this charge. She reported that most institutions could only estimate the cost of the accreditation process because they do not track the direct or indirect costs. Furthermore, she posed an important question: “If the cost of an accreditation review (which is what is usually reported) is amortized over the three or five or ten years of accredited status, is this too costly?”

During this peer review assignment, we were assigned two individuals to give us feedback on our papers. The two individuals who read over my paper was Kelsie Brooks and Ashlyn York, they both explained what my paper was written over, then they provided me helpful feedback on what to add or revise throughout the paper. Brooks explained how I needed to elaborate more on the paragraph about memories, and York wrote how I should fix my grammatical errors. So, therefore, I added more to the paragraph about memories, revised some sentences, and corrected a lot of my grammar within sentences.

I really do not have that much experience with peer review. The only time that I participated in peer review was high school senior English and English 101. And both classes really never focused or appreciated peer reviewing. With that being said, I really do not know how peer review works and how to make it successful. I have only ever traded my paper with good friends and have them tell me “it looks good.” Being that the past peer reviewing hasn’t been very successful hopefully I’ll learn to respect and find success in this writing process.