Peer Review Research Paper

Scientific method is used to solve empirical problems and discover empirical truth in an empirical pattern. The scientific method involves several steps, the first step is observing or asking question, second step is forming a hypothesis, third step is testing the hypothesis or experimenting, fourth step is confirm or disconfirm the hypothesis. In the simplest terms, scientific method is a process of trial and error. To give a concise example consider vehicle repair. Every weekend handyman, or every high school student with a passing interest in autos knows about the method of trial and error. If your car is starting to run poorly, and you take matters into your own hands in an attempt to fix it. The first step is to guess the nature of the problem for example faulty emission or low brake fluid. Acting on your instinct, you proceed to exchange a part, adjust a setting, or replace a fluid, and then see if the car runs better. If your initial guess is incorrect and the car is not improved, you revise your guess, make another adjustment, and once again test the car. With patience and enough guesses, this process will often result in an operable car. However, depending on one's

I also have a process when I peer review papers. I make sure to always compliment the student’s paper and then I point out some areas where there may need some improvement. I always make sure to provide an example so they know what I am trying to say.

In The Everyday Writer, I strongly believed that chapter 10 “Reviewing & Revising” was most helpful as I could relate to some of its statements. I believed that by reviewing my work, I’m bound to discover mistakes. By doing so, I could make minor adjustment to my work. However, sometimes looking over my own work isn’t enough so, that’s where a peer reviewer comes in. A peer reviewer is someone who challenges your work. By doing so, they give me a strong sense of doubt as I tend to overlook certain areas yet, the peer reviewer that I came across didn’t really help.

For PSY 3302, I created exams and powerpoints. I also provided additional readings for students beyond that textbook in the form of journal articles, by scholars of color in the field, and in the form of chapters from a second book that highlighted the seminal scholars in adolescent development in psychology. In order to assess students’ learning, students were required to write five summary papers, do a group presentation, and complete three exams over the course of the semester. Additionally, students were provided prompts, either in class or on Blackboard, and were instructed to respond via social media (Twitter or Instagram) using the hashtag #WSSUPSY3302. By commenting on the various prompts given throughout the semester, students had the opportunity to earn bonus points that were applied to their final grades.

The article chosen for this Scholarly Journal Critique is “Physical activity and exercise after stoma surgery: overcoming the barriers” by Sarah Russell. The article discusses a survey and its finding. There were 2631 respondents participated in the survey “Living with a stoma, your experience” in 2016. This is one of the largest known surveys to date. The survey, in particular, looked at the physical activity and the quality of life from people living with stomas in the UK. The results, presented by Sarah Russell, emphasized a fear of exercise in patients after their stoma surgery.

One of the most fruitful professional development opportunities this summer was the training program offered through the National Library of Medicine’s National Training Center, PubMed for Trainers. The 4 part course provided an in-depth look at PubMed, new tools and search strategies. The training included an additional instructional design component in addition to being exposed to the logic and methodologies used in PubMed will enhance my teaching of the platform. The training and the instructional design are going to be invaluable heading into the Fall semester. The instructional design sessions have guided and refined my upcoming library instruction sessions for nursing and exercise and health sciences students. It has reinforced me

I believe that the most challenging aspect of being a Texas Department of Family and Protective Services Investigator would be having to work in depressing or sad situations, and making the right judgement calls on cases. I know that I will see tough situations in this field, but you have to put your emotions aside and remain professional. I believe I have the ability to do that, while still feeling compassion for those involved in the situation. Also, I realize that you have to be able to make judgement calls in situations like these. As said in the video, everything will not be black and white but you need to be confident in the decisions you make. I believe that I have the ability to use proper judgment, and with proper training I will feel confident about the decisions I make pertaining to my job.

Entertainer gatherings are extremely regular. This is a gathering where mystical performers assemble for social reasons and have excitement which is enchantment in nature. The busman's vacation!

Dr. Mitchel Schiewe, Ovation Fertility™ Newport Beach laboratory director, reviews the development of assisted reproductive technologies in his latest paper.

It all started in kindergarten. Wednesday nights I, with all of my other classmates at the time, attended CCD classes at St. Magdalen Catholic Church. We all pursued these classes every Wednesday night, with the exception of summer. This continued up until sophomore year. When it finally reached the time to get confirmed, we would receive confirmation at the St. Michael Cathedral in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. The Cathedral, one of the most extravagant buildings in all of South Dakota, endures a very artistic and majestic look. It also possesses a huge chapel and commons area. This is where it will all happen; this where I will secure my confirmation.

What frightens me about a class that includes peer reviewing is not me reviewing others’ papers, but rather, their reviews of me. Because of this, I did not try to be too strict or too easy, and I tried to guide to guide my fellow peers along with questions instead of telling them a certain way would be better. At the beginning of my process in reviewing my peers’ papers, I decided it would be helpful to point out mostly grammar mistakes and syntax. For example, in John Silva’s essay, “A Fool with Good Intentions,” most of my focus was on correcting grammar although I briefly mentioned structure and meaning suggestions. The main criticism I had was that:

After a zealous and critical conference session, I received some suggestions, feedback and appraisals from my professor. I decided to incorporate the ideas given to me wherever possible to improve my paper. My professor started her comments by appreciating the personal stories I incorporated in my paper whether it was about my “joint Hindu family” or my life at Pace University. She believed that these stories held a lot of deep meaning. She also commented that the ideas taken from the unit one paper – discourse communities and converting them into a speech was done well for my unit four assignment.

You are correct stating educating patients on high risk behaviors such as IV drug use, sharing needles and unprotected sex greatly reduces the number on new cases that are diagnosed. One very important obstacle implementing this intervention is that healthcare “providers also have inadequate knowledge about viral hepatitis, often failing to provide at risk patients with viral hepatitis related services” (Ward, Valdiserri, & Koh, 2012, p. 559). Until we overcome improving awareness and education with the provider, reaching these at risk patients, then we can strengthen awareness in the community setting.

Elements included in executive functions include organizing, prioritizing, shifting flexibility, remembering/ accessing working memory, and self-checking. Executive functions are the set of processes that have to do with managing oneself in order to achieve a specific goal. First, in order to overcome organizing I can categorize and sort various things like my closet, room, and as well as school work like organizing papers within by folders and binders. Next, in order to overcome remembering/accessing working memory I can write school work, homework, and stuff done outside of school in my planner, notes in my phone, calendar in phone, or reminders in phone. Lastly, in order to overcome self-checking I could do mental checklist to make sure

As advancements are made in science and technology that relates to the care of patients, it is critical for nurses to be aware of the treatments that have been proven to be evidence-based. Systematic research reviews (SRR) are considered to have the highest ranking or level of evidence falling under level 1 evidence for reliability, validity, and least amount of error (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2015, p.607). The aim of this paper is to critique the chosen SRR related to core temperature obtainment in children, relevance of the research problem to nursing practice, rigor of the research found in the SRR to include levels of evidence and designs of included studies, the clarity of findings, summarized findings in the SRR, and the implications for practice.