Peeta Vs Katniss

In the movies, it’s more visual so you can actually see what’s going on. For example, The video clip of the Lorax, you can see all the characters acting and moving around. Also cooperating. You can also tell by watching the Lorax that at the beginning mood was happy and the ending was depressing. Finally, you could also visualize the bright forest full of truffla trees.

Peeta and Katniss had dinner at Mayor Undersee’s house in District 12. Katniss was happy that everyone in the entire district will fill their empty growling tummies. She accidently saw on the mayor's office television a news report that there is an uprising in District 8. Instantly, Katniss realized that this that is what President Snow was afraid of. Afterward, Katniss met Bonnie and Twill who have escaped district 8. They are heading for district 13, the main center for nuclear weaponry that was once destroyed by the first rebellion, is now functioning and accepting refuges.

Until page 50 it was a perfect beginning , and I had a good time in reading this pages and a lot of something to learn and something make me feel interest, such as, the deep description of the characters, places, and even food which made me feel the moment and as if I were living with them. Also, the way that the author had depicted how people suffered because of the hanger and poverty. Another thing that I want to notice about is that girl – Katniss – who was the ideal sister and daughter, when she prefers to go to The Hunger Games instead of her sister – Prim- ,and when she takes care of her ill mother. Furthermore, while all the bad things that happened to her and all the responsibilities that placed on her, but it didn't prevented her

The Hunger Games is really between life or death, so I’ll will be talking about teenage love. In other words, who does Katniss love, Gale or Peeta. Also I’ll be explaining their past memories. So I’ll be talking about both, Gale and Peeta’s past and feelings of Katniss, also Katniss’s feelings of them. Next, how they learn how to survive with each other.

Many books and stories are made into movies that are shown all around the world. However, not everyone likes the way the motion picture turns out. Sometimes, the movie is very close to the book, but most of the time certain details are lost or changed to make the movie look more appealing. This may take away or change the actual meaning of the original story. For example: Night, a book by Elie Wiesel, is about his personal experiences with the Holocaust and has emotional as well as shocking details.

Suzanne Collins demonstrates that the heroine Katniss is a good hero in “The Hunger Games” through bravery, inner strength and compassion. This is expressed through emotive language, repetition and descriptive language.

Whenever books are adapted for film, changes inevitably have to be made. The medium of film offers several advantages and disadvantages over the book: it is not as adept at exploring the inner workings of people - it cannot explore their minds so easily; however, the added visual and audio capabilities of film open whole new areas of the imagination which, in the hands of a competent writer-director, can more than compensate.

The difference between the developing way of books and movies is magnificently huge because the way of emotion transmitting is different; the movie is based on vision, while the book is based on words.

For instance, the book talks about how the greasers felt and how their feelings were, then in the movie, it didnt talk about it but it showed it. The way that they showed it was not as good as it was written. When reading we don't fall in love with the characters' appearance. We fall in love with their words, their thoughts, and their hearts. We fall in love with their soul. In movies we focus more on appearance and what's going on in the background, which then gets people distracted from what the character is feeling and their thoughts. On the other hand, you can see the actions of the characters in the movie, which might help you process the way they act, however with the book the author can use what he thinks and try to give people a general idea of everything. For an example in the book it talks about how Randy

“Books are better than movies because you design the set the way you want it to look.” This quote comes from Trent Reznor and some may agree and some may disagree. When reading a written version , the reader can visualize characters in their own way with context clues from the book. In movies, the viewer sees the characters the way the director wants to portray them.

The two main characters of my novel, The Hunger Games, are Peeta Mellark, and Kat-niss Everdeen, are two characters that particularly have a significant number of similarities, while still having a distinct amount of differences. Katniss is 16 years old, and she has long black hair, that is usually in a braid because of the games. She has grey eyes, and an olive skin tone. These physical traits are common in the Seam, which is the lower class part of District 12 where Katniss lives. Since she is only 5’5”, she isn’t very tall, but she is thin compared to the other tributes.

In addition, you can see the characters emotion, thoughts, and feelings. You can hear a lot better with the movie. The book is all in your head. In the book you can’t see anything at all. You just have to picture it unlike the movie.

Behind every great movie, comes a storyline that is derived from a book however, most of the books to the movies have a great number of deviations. The screenwriters and other staff members to include the director come up with these deviations to enhance the plot in the attempt to make it a more interesting film to which in turn can make a better profit. The majority of differences that is found in films main objective is to enhance the mind. For example, when a scene has the ability to get a particular feeling out of a viewer, it is imperative to be able to understand the reasons for those feelings. The dialog and the visual effects of a scene sets a tone that differs from that of the book that it was taken from. Also, screen writers and

    Film and literature are two media forms that are so closely related, that we often forget there is a distinction between them. We often just view the movie as an extension of the book because most movies are based on novels or short stories. Because we are accustomed to this sequence of production, first the novel, then the motion picture, we often find ourselves making value judgments about a movie, based upon our feelings on the novel. It is this overlapping of the creative processes that prevents us from seeing movies as distinct and separate art forms from the novels they are based on.

Literature can, at times, have a fascinating connection with film. Whether it is a film or a piece of literature, both are written by someone that wants to leave an impact on an audience. However, movies and books have different roles. They each have different strong points wherein books give better characterization, stronger revelations, and inner conflict, but movies create a better mood with music and visuals, showing much more emotion. It's a totally different kind of experience, of course, and there are a number of differences between the book and the movie. The novel of 2001: A Space Odyssey by Arthur C. Clarke, for example, attempts to explain things much more explicitly than the film does, which is inevitable in a verbal medium. The movie version of 2001: A Space Odyssey, directed by Stanley Kubrick, on the other hand, is essentially a visual, nonverbal experience. It avoids intellectual verbalization and reaches the viewer's subconscious in a way that is essentially poetic and philosophic. The film thus becomes a subjective experience, which hits the viewer at an inner level of consciousness, just as music does, or painting. Utilizing its verbal medium, Clarke is able to explain his narrative, whereas Kubrick creates a visual and audial experience, through means of ambiguity, in which the viewer sees everything, is told nothing, and in which one cannot detect the presence of the film as one at all.