Pelosi Enhanced Interrogation Case Study

The CIA used waterboarding as an interrogation method to try to get leaders of Al Qaeda to talk. The dilemma came up when Abu Zubaydah, an Al Qaeda leader, became uncooperative in prison. The George Bush administration held meetings to decide what interrogation methods would be legal. A modern form of waterboarding was deemed acceptable and the most extreme interrogation method listed. According to sources, waterboarding has been used on three top Al Qaeda officials (Ross, 2007). The CIA maintains that this method is effective and completely lawful.

Memos from the Department of Defense called for the implementation of enhanced interrogation techniques to begin immediately and to be sure “these are carried out”, these were in accordance with the White House. All of President Bush’s closest cabinet members and national security advisers signed off on enhanced interrogation, believing that under the legal research conducted the techniques satisfied the legal standard as not being torture, (Bartz, 2006)

A new congressional report was released last week detailing the controversial CIA torture program during the years following the September 11 attacks on the twin towers. The report detailed several despicable ways detainees were treated at various CIA black sites, detainees endured waterboarding, sleep deprivation, confinements, rectal feeding and death from hypothermia. The most despicable aspect of the report was that psychiatrists, psychologist, and some physicians originated some of the torture techniques used by the CIA.

You know, they don't use waterboarding over there. They use chopping off people's heads. They use drowning people. I don't know if you’ve seen with the cages where they put people in cages and they drown them in the ocean and then they lift out the cage. And we're talking about waterboarding. We have to be tough. We have to be… I would bring it back, yes. I would bring it back. I think waterboarding is peanuts compared to what they do to us. What they're doing to us, what they did to James Foley when they chopped off his head, that's a whole different level and I would absolutely bring back interrogation and strong interrogation" (“Should Interrogation

In this video we hear from the man who was in charge of interrogating the person who planned 9/11. Jose Rodriguez, CIA interrogator, tells about how Khalid Sheikh Mohammed would not give in to their interrogation so they used “enhanced interrogation techniques.” Waterboarding, giving the sensation of drowning, was used to try and break Mohammed. Little the they know it would take over 180 times of “being drowned” to finally speak up. Mohammed never thought he was going to die. He was allowed to sleep and drink ensure. Rodriguez thinks that all of the deprivation, waterboarding and manipulation finally cracked Mohammed. Rodriguez also ordered the destruction of the videos of the interrogation for the safety of the interrogators and their families.

“A Case For Torture” is an essay written by Michael Levin in which he tries to make a compelling case for the use of torture as a punishment during specific situations in the United States. Levin cites different hypothetical situations in order to logically prove his argument. His use of theoretical instances is meant to help direct the reader to an understanding of the applications of his policy on torture. The examples he uses include a hypothetical terrorist attack on Manhattan and hospital robbery. But unfortunately, the examples Levin cites lack strength due to their inapplicability to the current world. Equally important, in today’s terrorist centered climate, there is no room for Levin’s position on torture. Michael Levin in “A Case For Torture” is not logically convincing in his discussion as to why torture is a valid form of punishment, because his assertions rely too heavily on the speculative, and are not contemporary enough for use in modern times.

dilemma is. 600 Words An ethical dilemma that I have come across in my studies is rendition. Rendition in the context of governments means surrendering someone to another state where that person is accused or convicted in order to stand trial. (Fisher, 1406) Prior to the horrific events of 9/11, rendition wasn’t widely known, nor was it discussed a lot in any aspects. Since 9/11, there has been countless operations to find terrorists around the world, to prevent another attack from occurring. President Obama signed Executive Order 13491 to provide guidance on ensuring lawful interrogations were conducted by the US. In this order, it states that nothing should affect “the obligations of officers, employees, and other agents of the United States Government to comply with all pertinent laws and treaties of the United States governing detention and interrogation, including the Geneva Convention” (Whitehouse, 2009).

For many years and still today, families of the victims of 9/11 still mourn their losses. 9/11 was America’s greatest tragedy and will have an everlasting impact on the lives of people who experienced it, and even those who did not. Gathering intelligence on the terrorist organizations behind the series

One of the policies that I feel should be brought to light be interrogation standards and information sharing within the U.S. government. These standards are very important and very detrimental to the sanctity of the American populace. We will first look at the interrogation standards and dissect our current methods and then we will look at how our current agencies relay information to each other on the federal level. This is important because that was one of the main reasons there was so much chaos on September 11, 2001.

After the terrorist attacks on 9/11 CIA interrogation tactics were heighten to rapidly expedite the extraction of information that could lead to the interception of a future terrorist attacks. The Bush Administration was in control during this period of time. The 9/11 attack was significant enough to be the defining change of the twenty first century when it comes to global security. Terrorism violates human rights and constitutes a serious challenge for liberal democracies (Masferrer pg. 1). This subject runs a fine line between human rights and national/international laws. There were a lot of unknowns about how brutal the techniques were of the CIA. The agency also lied to the White House and congress about how intensive their techniques

The CIA, or Central Intelligence Agency, has been the subject of government mystery for years. With so many unknown secrets, it is no wonder that mistrust and controversy have joined the mysterious aura surrounding the organization. One such controversy that has drawn much attention in recent years is that associated with the CIA's Interrogation Program. Numerous reports have been and are still continuing to be released on the program, specifically on the torture utilized. Torture in itself is a sensitive issue, even more so when combined with an already suspicious government agency. These reports have therefore divided the public on the question: should the CIA face prosecution for torture in the Interrogation Program? Due to the fact that

To gather this intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency resorted to using the controversial practice of enhanced interrogation techniques (CIA Tactics). According to the BBC, interrogation techniques included, slapping detainees, subjecting detainees to cold, forcing detainees into painful stress positions, and sexual threats and humiliation. In the interrogation of detainee Abu Zubaydah, he was deprived of sleep by his CIA interrogators for a period of 180 hours, or seven and a half days (CIA Tactics). In addition to sleep deprivation, the BBC reports that Zubaydah was kept in “a coffin-sized box for a total of 266 hours” or eleven days. He was even kept in an even smaller box, 53cm wide, 76cm deep, and 76cm tall for a period of 29 hours (CIA Tactics). The most controversial of these techniques were known as water boarding. According to the

The United States government has issued a report detailing the use of “enhanced interrogation methods” that many have defined as torture. Imagine that, in response to this report, a bill has been introduced in Congress that would forbid the use of tactics that the bill’s sponsors have defined as torture, including waterboarding, excessive sleep deprivation, and solitary confinement, in American counter-terrorism efforts.

The testimony of witness state that the unreliable words of prisopners and fellow This contains 20-hour enquired every day, over a duration of several months, and several other "modified interrogation techniques," which severely endangered his health. Variations of these techniques was then adopted by other prisoners in Guantánamo (and to Abu Ghraib), and in January 2009, just before George W. Bush tenure got over, Susan Crawford, a retired judge and a close friend of Dick Cheney and David Addington, who was recruited to overlook the military commissions at Guantánamo as the transferring authority, told Bob Woodward that she had denied to media charges against al-Qahtani, because, as she said, "We tortured Qahtani. His treatment met the legal definition of torture."

After 9/11 attacks happened, With President Bush’s consent, the CIA constructed new interrogation techniques that mainly focus on using cruel and inhuman ways to breakdown the suspects in order to acquire information that the CIA believes they have and extract confessions for things that the CIA believes they have done. Some of the cruel interrogation techniques includes “sleep deprivation, slapping, subjection to cold and simulated drowning, known as "waterboarding".”( CIA Tactics ) Take waterboarding for example, “in which a person is strapped on a board with a rag or cloth covering his or her face and doused with water” (Does Waterboarding Have) During the waterboarding, water will get into lungs and it is proven that waterboarding will cause profoundly traumatic to not only lungs, but also brain damage from oxygen deprivation, not to mention the serious psychological damage afterwards. Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, one of the key prisoners from