Penn State Scandal - Human Behavior Essay

Penn State spent millions maybe billions in lawsuits, not only defending the college but paid out to victims as well. They lost contributions from Alumni’s; the university lost advertising deals, the support of major companies such as General Motors. The football program was sanctioned and could not participate in some of their games.

"Joseph Miller testi ed that he was head wrestling coach for the elementary wrestling program for that school district. He knew Victim 1, who had wrestled for him. Miller corroborated that one evening in 2006 or 2007, he returned to the high school to retrieve something he had forgotten. He saw a light on in the weight room which should have been turned off and when he went in, he discovered Victim 1 and Sandusky, lying on their sides, in physical contact, face to face on a mat. He said both Victim 1 and Sandusky were surprised to see him enter the room. He recalls

Everything was looking good for Joe Paterno and Penn State football as his football managing career rose with an overall record of 298-136-3 but in 2011, all that changed. Back in 2000 a janitor of Penn State witnessed Sandusky receiving oral sex from a young boy, the janitor reported what he saw to co-workers and his supervisor but none of these men reported these actions to authorities. It wasn’t until November 5, 2011 that Sandusky was arrested on a $100,000 bail and up to 40 criminal counts. ESPN were quickly in the scene to investigate and report the allegations on Sandusky. They quickly reported saying Sandusky was charged with more than 50 counts of child sex-abuse involving 10 boys he met through The Second

All in all, the NCAA hasn’t been monitoring collegiate athletic programs as close as they should. Consequently, many student athletes continue to find themselves in the middle of unethical situations within their respective programs. With numerous issues arising, it would be in the best interest of the NCAA and the U.S. Government

Another boy was interrogated by Shreffler who reported similar treatment reported by the 6th Victim. But the investigation ends after District Attorney Ray Gricar decided the case warranted no criminal charges. Shreffler reported to the grand jury that Thomas Harmon, who headed the campus police, told him to close the inquiry. Subsequent investigative reported that Sandusky retired from Penn State's football program in the year 1999, but with an "emeritus" label that allowed him continued access to campus facilities, including the locker room and an office in the latch football

The FBI had stated that after conducting an investigation that these senior officials had known about Sandusky’s actions as early as 1998 and had failed to disclose this information to authorities. On October 9, 2012, Jerry Sandusky was sentenced to a minimum of 30 years and a maximum of 60 years in prison. Spanier, Curley, and Schultz have been charged with grand jury perjury, conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and child endangerment in association with the scandal. Paterno and McQueary never had any charges pressed on them because they did what they were obligated to do. McQueary had reported the incident to his superior which is Joe Paterno. Joe Paterno also reported the incident to his superior who is Curley and Schultz. This whole situation caused a huge reaction nationwide.

However, I would have to agree with the first half and say that Joe Paterno’s actions were inadequate. Although Joe Paterno reported what he saw to the Penn State president his responsibility shouldn’t have ended there. Yes, he fulfilled his obligation to report any illegal actions on campus but when the Penn State President chose not to take legal action Paterno should have made the moral decision and had gone to the authorities. Legally, he fulfilled his obligation and therefore no longer holds any responsibility in the eyes of the legal system. In the eyes of morality though, his responsibility in the matter was not over just because he reported it to who he was supposed to. This major problem should have been dealt with a long time ago. It’s just a moral obligation that Joe Paterno should have acted upon. So yes I feel he deserved to be fired. Everyone who knew about it should have reported it to legal authorities. His great athletic achievements and mutual respect should have pushed towards the issue being resolved and not swept under the rug for it to come out years after and now resulting in him being fired. Every action has a reaction and in this case the reaction is due to Paternos lack of action.

The Jerry Sandusky investigation would continue after subpoenas would be served into his records at Penn State University. Just like anything else, past reports begin to become known even though it took the 1998 reports before these older reports were known. These incidents were reported 1994 – 1997. “According to the grand jury report, Sandusky allegedly engages in inappropriate conduct with three different boys he met separately through the Second Mile program. One boy was 7 or 8, another was 10 and the third was 12 or 13 at the time. According to the grand jury report, the now-grown men said Sandusky engaged in inappropriate conduct ranging from touching to outright sexual encounters, including several incidents during the night before Penn

The Penn State case that came to light in 2012 is a situation that will be discussed for years to come. Before this situation was brought to light, head coach Joe Paterno was looked at as one of the best coaches in college football history. While it is understandable why former athletic director Tim Curley and Joe Paterno had covered up the situation. They desired to maintain the integrity of the Penn State Nittany Lions football program, and they would do that at whatever cost. However, I agree with you that I too would have acted polar opposite and immediately turned the situation over to the authorities and terminated the employment of Jerry Sandusky. This is not a situation that Curley and Paterno should have covered up, and Penn

The numerous accounts of unethical conduct show that the NCAA has little control over maintaining ethical conduct. If they do not change their approach, the controversial incidents will continue to occur. For example, there are three main stories mentioned in the MindTap reading. This includes the sexual assault scandal at Penn State, the received benefit exclusively for being a football player at Ohio State, and the controversial scandal between the coach and a former student at the University of Arkansas. This proves that the NCAA should be focusing more on ensuring individual rights and values instead of focusing on increasing the school’s revenues. The NCAA seemed to already be taking the compliance approach to resolve those cases and address the stakeholder versus shareholder dilemma. The compliance approach simply meant the NCAA made sure universities were following guidelines suggested by them. It did not prove

The information, in this case, is overwhelming. Personally, I cannot believe this travesty was committed with all of the officials that knew what Sandusky was doing. On November 5, 2011, Sandusky was arraigned on 40 criminal counts and was released on a one hundred thousand dollar bail. At that time Curley and Schultz are charged with felony perjury and one count of failure to report the abuse allegations. November 7, 2011, Curley and Schulz resigned from their positions. Consequently, on November 9, 2011, Paterno announces he would retire at the end of the 2011 season, hours later the university announces that President Spanier and Coach Paterno were terminated. On November 11, 2011, McQueary, who witnessed the 200 rape is placed on indefinite

In another effort to main the postcrisis, “The National Collegiate Athletic Association agreed to restore 112 football victories stripped from the Pennsylvania State University football program” (NCAA, 2015). “The agreement also resolves a long-running lawsuit challenging the NCAA's punishments by spending the $60-million fine it imposed on Penn State within the Stat of Pennsylvania” (NCAA, 2015)

On Saturday November 5, 2011, former Penn State football coach Jerry Sandusky was charged that he preyed on boys he met through The Second Mile, a charity he founded for at-risk youths. Sandusky was indicted on 42 counts of child molestation dating from 1994 to 2009, though the alleged abuse may date as far back as the 1970s.

Additionally, based upon the Freeh Report, Human Resources, along with university leadership were charged with reorienting the university’s culture and creating a safe environment for all employees to report wrongdoing without fear of retaliation or retribution (Kingkade, 2012). Moreover, the athletic department, particularly the football program was profoundly impacted by the crisis due to the firing of legendary coach Paterno and the unprecedented sanctions levied by the NCAA against the program (Fahn, 2012). While some of those sanctions have since been rolled back, an ever present stain now blots the memory of most stakeholders of the football program during this 12 year period and the entire legacy of the once legendary coach Paterno (Allen, 2012). In conclusion, while I only listed a few departments impacted by the Jerry Sandusky, Penn State scandal, every department, alumnus, and Penn State University student was deeply affected by the scandal and their opinions of the university’s leadership during that time were likely forever

Jerry Sandusky is a name no Pennsylvania State University football fan wants to hear on game day and 2011 is a year that many would likely forget if they could. On November 5th, 2011, several national media outlets reported Jerry Sandusky was a major part of an ongoing, three-year sexual abuse investigation (Klein & Cooper, 2016). The weeks following increasingly became harder to read news stories as more and more cryptic details began surfacing. Young children are so innocent and pure, what causes adults to rob them of their innocence? Reasons can vary from the thrill of molesting children, to feeling power and dominance over the child; furthermore, combining reasons like these to the childhood of Jerry Sandusky and socialization in criminology, one will better be able to understand the questions revolving around this topic.