Pepsico Inc. : Climate Change

Based on my research, PepsiCo is an extremely ethical and socially responsible. PepsiCo bases their premise off of their values and philosophies as a reflection of the socially and environmentally responsible company they aspire to be. Every business decision that is made is based off of these philosophies and values. PepsiCo acknowledges their power and influences that they can make on different society’s and markets and use that to their advantage to make good and powerful actions to reflect on others. The company spends the extra time and steps to make sure that they fully understand what customers that they are dealing with and to be able to accomplish their needs and their desires in the products that they produce. PepsiCo’s mission is to, “be the world’s premier consumer products company focused on convenient foods and beverages. They seek to produce financial rewards to investors as they provide opportunities for growth and enrichment to

Many firms are learning that being environmentally friendly and sustainable has numerous benefits. (O.C Ferrell, Fraedrich, Ferrell, 2015). This could enable them to increase goodwill from various stakeholders and also save money in the long term. This will mean that they are being more efficient and less wasteful of resources, which will enable them to be more competitive by satisfying stakeholders. The CEO of

or so many years our society has been thinking of forming new creative and innovative businesses, which would be more environmental and customer friendly. Nowadays a large number of different companies follow the social, ethical, as well as moral consequences when it comes to their decision making. One of the relatively new concepts involving economic and social concerns is Corporate Social Responsibility. Many of us apply this approach not only at work, but also in everyday life without even recognizing.

DesJardins, (2007) discusses that a new paradigm is needed to re-conceptualize how businesses practice. He further states that a large a large portion of the world lacks the basic rights of clean waters,

The purpose of this paper is to compare the sustainability practices of two companies in the same industry. The two companies chosen for comparison are The Hershey Company and Coca-Cola Enterprises, both of which are in the consumer staples industry. These two corporations are ranked sixth and eighth, respectively, on the Newsweek Top Green Companies in the U.S 2015. They have taken pride in creating sustainable product designs, having environmentally sustainable processes and supply chain management.

One point of view says that we should invest in the environment because it will increase our reputation among other things resulting in increased sales. Another point of view is to not invest in sustainability and since consumers gravitate towards the best products and the best prices, which a team could develop, then sustainability is just an unneeded expense. As a team we feel that there should a balance of both investing in sustainable business practices and turning a profit. This strategy can be seen when we turned a $4,600,257 profit in quarter six while investing in seven conscious

If customers refuse to buy products from organization that do not value the environment, organizations will change to customer’s needs. Along with not buying products, customers should not invest with companies who do not value the environment and communities. “Economists incorporate the triple bottom line into their models of business decision making by assuming that many individuals will buy shares in companies that achieve the triple bottom line outcomes they want and will sell shares in companies that do not” (Douglas, 2012. Pg. 7).

The majority of people in today’s global society have a false sense of security in believing that the effects of climate change will not take place until the very distant future, and are to dire to bear engaging. Environmental protection is currently one of the largest social issues facing different groups within society including; governments, special interest groups, everyday citizens and global organisations. The actions of organisations with regards to environmental sustainability are becoming a larger factor in business operations. Today’s more informed society expects businesses to perform out of the traditional economic measure of profit motive and adjust to society’s efforts to achieve modern sustainability goals. BHP Billiton (BHP) is the largest and leading global resources company, being the world’s largest producers of major commodities including; coal, copper, iron ore, nickel and uranium. BHP’s annual revenue for 2014 can be rounded off to $607,206million US Dollars and currently hires 128,800 employees and contractors over 141 locations. These figures not only represent how large BHP is, but they highlight the importance of BHP’s contribution to help achieve

It covers the corporate sustainability performance of Costco Wholesale Corporation’s U.S. and Canadian operations for September 2007 through August 2008. Our environmental reporting is still evolving. We recognize the need to report more environmental metrics information in future reports. Charts and graphs and greenhouse gas emission reports in this report refer to calendar 2007 data for Costco’s U.S. and Canadian Operations, as we will publish this information on a calendar-year basis. Inside you will find many examples of Costco’s move toward becoming a sustainable business. We are taking actions across our entire business operations to improve our global stewardship. We are focused on the areas where we have the most impact, including energy efficiencies, environmentally friendly packaging, disposal of waste from our business operations and sustainable products. We are committed to using innovation and sensible environmental steps to grow our business and minimize our impact on the environment.

Sustainability has become a great topic of interest in many arenas. Particularly, leading organizations are recognizing sustainability needs to be an essential aspect of their long term strategies. With this recognition, better business practices are being sought by investors as well as sustainability is becoming a driving force for better efficiencies and innovation. Two organizations, Wal-Mart and Starbucks, have both took on sustainability as long term initiatives to address their customer needs and affect how their suppliers operate.

Additionally, on a socio-cultural level, many consumers feel that restaurants partaking in green initiatives and operations are doing their part to not only help sustain the earth but also to conserving natural resources (Hu, Parsa & Self, 2010). “Going green” is not simply a trend in the food service industry but around the world and in all forms of business. Corporate companies consider “going green” as a sensible business strategy in building recognition for corporate social responsibility among consumers concerned with environmental conservation efforts. Lastly, technological initiatives such as Energy Star appliances (dishwashers, refrigerators, ice machines, etc.) and faucets that use less water must also be analyzed in their ecological conservation capability and weighed against their financial costs (University of Notre Dame, 2014).

One positive implication capitalism has to the natural environment is industrial ecology, a system of chain production and consumption, serving to the lowest environmental impacts in a most environmentally sustainable economy as the main goal of operation (Richards & Pearson, 1998). The Companies in a like to operate in such way because of four major reasons. The most important factor is known as the corporate well-being, for it is determined by higher profits and growth provided by innovations in an industry. Profits are increased from recognizing the production ineffiency costs that comes from wasted inputs and energy losses; this allowing cost savings to increase and ineffiency to decrease. compliance with cleaner technology alternatives such as ones that produce less waste and less energy will provide long term savings which are both beneficial to the environment and the business at hand. A real world example freight company changes their salvaged driving equipment to hybrid vehicles. Money is temporarily lost, but the gasoline and maintenances cost savings will compensate in a long run period of time.

PepsiCo is one of the world’s leading food and beverage companies with products being sold in over two hundred countries and territories around the world. PepsiCo began in 1965 when Pepsi-Cola merged with Frito-Lay and now distributes twenty-two brands of products that include Pepsi, Lays, Tropicana and Quaker. This paper will provide information about PepsiCo’s dedication to environmental, human and talent sustainability while increasing revenue by reducing essential production costs such as water use and packaging materials.

Although some schools of taught are of the opinion that the issue of Cooperate Social Responsibility is a must, businesses should be seen socially responsible to the communities/countries in which they operate, whilst other schools of thought are of the view that the issue of Cooperate Social Responsibility could be optional and that companies should not be harassed about fulfilling their Cooperate Social Responsibilities. Companies should however concentrate in producing goods that are of high quality to satisfy their customers so that they can get an edge over their competitors and also to satisfy their investors, and the environment, motivate their employees, and also obeying government policies. The issue of cooperate social responsibility however means that cooperation should voluntarily pay out of their profits to improve their host communities/countries socially, economically and environmentally (the three p’s – people, profit and the planet) It is alongside this context that this research will be trying to establish whether Addax Bio-energy (SL) Limited is really behaving ethically, morally, or even providing philanthropic aids to it communities, employees or government. This issue of behaving socially responsible has really become a problem for companies of which the company understudied is of

Introduction: This assignment is to demonstrate the ethical and green management practices that is put to training within the two selected organizations, Coco Cola and Pepsi, it is required to compare and contrast and to differentiate the types of project and challenges that are faced and produced from an organization to help the environment, in addition to come up with solutions.