Performance Appraisal : Employee Involvement Essay

Performance management systems benefit stakeholders at every level if they are implemented successfully. Performance management systems align employee performance with the strategic direction set by the organization. St. Jessica’s Urban Medical Center’s leadership must perform specific actions, prior to implementing the new performance management system, to ensure it is a success. The organization's leadership must disseminate the information throughout the company, create a process that ensures employees can dispute ratings, train raters to evaluate employees and gain buy-in from early adopters (Aguinis, 2013). A newly implemented performance management system will fail if the proper steps are not taken in the beginning.

In order for an organization to achieve long term success, it must consistently evaluate those plans and consider all of the organization’s entities and how they link together. By appraising the existing performance management process, it forces deeper analysis of the process, as well as its intended and unintended influences towards employees and the organization.

Officer Lerma, this is your annual Employee Performance Appraisal. This appraisal reflects the observations made by myself as well as Sgt. Drake A9663 and Sgt. Camenisch B0467 from your Blue Team Supervisor Notes. During this period you have been assigned to Durango Jail on Shift 2.

Measuring performance means when a business will measure the quality of the activities that are passing and the quality of the services provided to the customers by employees. It involves creating a simple, but effective, system for determining whether organizations meet objectives. It’s also a process of collecting and reporting information regarding the performance of an individual, group or organizations. It can

Officer Wiles, this is your annual Employee Performance Appraisal. I have not been your supervisor for this entire evaluation period. This appraisal reflects the observations made by myself as well as Sgt. Mellott B0058 and Sgt. Malast B1962 and includes input from your Employee Performance Notes. During this period you have been assigned to Lower Buckeye Jail on Shift 2.

A performance management system should consist of planning, monitoring, reviewing and evaluating (Hrcouncil.ca, 2015). During the planning phase management should identify, clarify and agree upon expectations of the employee. Also, in this phase management needs to determine how results will be measured, agree on the monitoring process and document the plan for performance management. Furthermore, this step is imperative for management to identify and ensure the performance objectives are explicitly stated to the employee. In the development of this phase management would

Assessment is the on-going review by a line manager of the work an employee or a team has performed that is measured against expected outcomes. It is a two way communication channel that gives a shared understanding of what is to be achieved, it provides an opportunity to get employees to buy in to the process. It is a useful tool that can highlight development needs. It can highlight good practice, and bad practice and if there are deficiencies in the process, on either side. This means there is an opportunity to recognise achievement and where problems are identified, how these can be

Performance management is a continuous system which enables line managers to assess their employees’ performance. Performance Management is directly looking at how people work, how they are managed and developed and ultimately to maximise their contribution to the organisation. As (M Martin et al, 2010, pg 157) stated;

Regardless of whether your organisation is new to the review process, returning to it after a lapse or reorganising its review strategies, it’s important that the plans include everyone involved - such as employees, managers, senior executives and even stakeholders like customers. The more engaged people are in the performance review process, the greater the benefits will be. That takes planning, discussions of the topics to be covered in advance and an agenda for reviewing performances.

Our research and experience validates that in order to achieve an effective Performance Management system, it must be inclusive of the organization’s objectives, Mission Statement, goals and core values. It must gain “buy in” and approval from all stakeholders, it must be clear, measurable and provide an opportunity for effective

Performance reviews are designed to both evaluate general performance and measure progress around specific goals. Both negative and positive aspects are incorporated in these reviews as they should serve as a point of reference to both look back in evaluation and ahead in anticipation. Pulling back from daily demands in order to assess and review employee performance allows managers to focus their attention on specific departments and clarify what is high priority to their company. Performance reviews also act as an opportunity to acknowledge working staff and identify professional development which will further support the staff members’ career growth. Reviews are seen as a powerful tool that can be tied to a company’s overall success;

The company needs to conduct Monthly performance reviews on all staff ensuring that agenda’s are used and meetings following the reviews are documented and filed according and if poor performance is a topic on the agenda senior management and a human resources specialist is attendance. Decisions made in performance management reviews are to be documented and conducted using the recommended template (see appendix 3)

The current model of Performance management uses “Performance Review” to provide employees with feedback on their job performance. The issue with this mode is that it is not conducive to an organization that encourages its employees. Managers they are coaching their employees when in reality they just giving feedback, from manager to employee, about the employee’s work

The execution performance management requires the participation of numerous players (Managers, supervisors, and subordinates). For the system to succeed and accepted, clear understanding about the system is needed for effective implementation. Supervision and explanation of performance appraisal system is very crucial element for performance. ‘‘Merely developing a model of the strategy does not ensure the strategy will be successful.’’ Othman (2008, p. 261). Clarifying goals and supervising regularly help to develop people, improve performance, and satisfaction. Therefore, Supervision and explanation is appropriate for all employees regardless of how well or poorly they perform.

o Performance evaluations are formal review processes designed to encourage the informal day-to-day practice of performance management, while providing a framework in support of merit pay adjustments, promotion and employment decisions. Evaluating staff performance and helping employees develop their skills are important duties associated with performance management. Performance management begins with supervisors and employees collaboratively setting goals and standards, clearly communicating performance expectations and evaluating the results during the performance evaluation process.