Performance Appraisal

An important element of the appraisal process is the setting of targets and objectives for the next period. An employee cannot be expected to perform well if they do not have a clear understanding of what is expected.

Performance appraisal is a method which is increasingly used to evaluate employees to determine the degree to which they are performing effectively and encourage them to direct their energies towards organizational performance. Although the appraisal is being practiced, there are criticisms made against the system which generally arise from within the Orthodox and radical management frame work.

For each element needed for an effective performance appraisal system, have criteria to ensure its proper function. The element of overall policy, the criteria that should be present is clear measurable performance criteria, clearly stated and defined performance goals and objectives, information for the application and operation of the system, procedures to address employee performances, and information that identifies those covered by this system. The overall policy must meet regulatory requirements of the state, county, city, or federal laws. According to [5 CFR 430.209(a)]), Agency must also obtain approval prior to implementing changes that modify any element of the system subject to regulatory requirements.

An effective performance appraisal system strives for as much precision in defining and measuring performance dimensions as is feasible. Some of the major problems with the Darby appraisal system are:

Assessment is the on-going review by a line manager of the work an employee or a team has performed that is measured against expected outcomes. It is a two way communication channel that gives a shared understanding of what is to be achieved, it provides an opportunity to get employees to buy in to the process. It is a useful tool that can highlight development needs. It can highlight good practice, and bad practice and if there are deficiencies in the process, on either side. This means there is an opportunity to recognise achievement and where problems are identified, how these can be

Within my setting a process we use to monitor, evaluate the performance of individuals and teams is appraisals. “All contracted staff should receive some sort of appraisal with their line manager” Daly M el al (2004 p.2070). Appraisals are good process for both managers and the staff team to openly discuss performances and quality of production and output at work. “Appraisals are regular meetings between employers and subordinate, providing a non-threatening routine occasion when work standards cam be discussed and suggestions for improvement can be jointly decided”. Sadek and Sadek (2004 p.134). To carry out a successful appraisal there is a few stages to make sure that all the correct

Performance appraisal is an evaluation and grading exercise undertaken in organizations to achieve several objectives such as employee motivation, identification of training needs, rewards and remuneration, employee development through feedback etc. [Fig. 1]. All methods for performance appraisal have several advantages and disadvantages based on location of the firm, socio-economic environment, vision and mission of the firm, organizational structure and other factors. Organizations in different industrial sectors may have different focus areas of work and different values and thus, expectations from employees vary across sectors.

CIPD (2012) ‘While performance appraisal is an important part of performance management, in itself it is not performance management: rather, it is one of the range of tools that can be used to manage performance. However, it is a common mistake to assume that if organizations implement performance appraisals, they have performance management. Performance management is a holistic process bringing together many activities that collectively contribute to the effective management of individuals and teams in order to achieve high levels of organizational performance. The process is strategic, in that it is about broader issues and long-term goals, and integrated in that

The performance appraisal system used by our organization is done annually. The purpose of the review is for employee as well as manager, to aptitude performance from the past year relating to the specific responsibilities and objective of that employee. This gives the opportunity for managers to give feedback on the strengths and development areas that are summarized from that previous year. Employees must also use this opportunity to give feedback on how they can best perform and develop themselves. This

These measures are put into place for and by the management to better structure the company for them to be in compliance with the consumer needs.

The need of the performance appraisal is to determinewhat aspects of the performance to be evaluated

Performance appraisal process if made clear and transparent can help a lot to avert low morale in employees. Fair, trustworthy, and transparent processes for performances management and resource allocation help to meet people’s drive to defend.

Under how the company must decide what different methods are available and which of these may be used for performance appraisal. Based on the comparative advantages and disadvantages it is decided which method suit the propose best.

Performance appraisal though very widely used an probably sound in theory but it presents a numbers of problems in actual practice. The obstacles which are noted quite common and more frequent during the research are:

The criteria for appraisal are separate for officers and workers. (Employees of grade H1 and above belong to the officer cadre and those in H2 and below are in worker cadre). For officer grade the appraisal consists of four parts. The first part consists of self-appraisal in which the employee will judge himself on various parameters already defined in the