Periodontal Discrepancy Essay

My job shadowing experience with Dr. D. Lance Taylor has helped me in learning about the quality of education and intensive clinical training conducted at the SIU School of Dental Medicine. In addition, the clinical certification course will aid in enhancing my knowledge and developing skills required to make a smooth transition into the class. More importantly, opportunities to serve at the Give Kids a Smile and Mission of Mercy clinics will help in continuing my passion for community service. Also, it will be a great opportunity to learn from the ongoing clinical research at the school and improve my critical thinking. I am particularly interested in the research of Dr. Nathalia Garcia about the role of biomarkers in the progression of periodontal

Called malocclusions, bite problems not only affect how the teeth can look, they also affect how a person’s mouth closes (or doesn’t.) Some common bite problems include crossbites, overbites, and underbites. Each type of jaw misalignment affects the teeth slightly differently.

WookHeo, Dong-SeokNahm, and Seung-HakBaek (2007)32performed study to compare the amount of anchorage loss of the maxillary posterior teeth and amountof retraction of the maxillary anterior teeth between en masse retraction and two-step retraction of the anterior teeth.30 female adult patients with Class I malocclusion and lip protrusion were included in the study. The sample was subdivided into group 1 (en masse retraction) and group 2 (two-step retraction). Lateral cephalograms were taken before (T1) and after treatment (T2). Nine skeletal and 10 anchorage variables were measured, and independent t-test was used for statistical analysis.The amount of horizontal retraction of the maxillary anterior teeth was not different between the two groups, there was mild labial movement of the root apices of the upper incisors in group 2 at T2. No significant difference in the degree of anchorage loss of the maxillary posterior teeth was observed between the two groups. Bodily and mesial movements of the upper molars occurred in both groups. A 4 mm of the retraction of the upper incisal edges resulted from 1 mm of anchorage loss in the upper molars in both groups.

If you suffer from periodontal gum disease, you’re not alone. Statistics show that roughly 50% of all US adults have periodontal disease. Unfortunately, periodontal disease is the leading cause of premature tooth loss in adults. If you’ve suffered premature tooth loss due to gum disease, your dentist may have recommended dental implants, which are a permanent way to replace missing teeth.

Gums are designed to provide support for your teeth, helping anchor them inside your mouth. Those that suffer from periodontal disease will notice shifting teeth when the disease has set in. When the gums become loose, so will your teeth. Periodontal disease can ruin years of orthodontic work by causing the teeth to settle at a crooked

Chronic periodontitis is a slowly progressive inflammatory disease that results in the destruction of periodontium (Armitage and Cullinan, 2010, Shaddox and Walker, 2010). It is characterized by clinical attachment greater than or equal to 5mm and radiographic evidence of alveolar bone loss (Cabanilla, Neely and Hernandez, 2008). Teeth with active periodontal

Chronic periodontitis has been identified as the most prevalent form of periodontitis affecting the adults and occasionally the adolescents and children.(Merin, 2015) This periodontal disease of inflammatory origin is thought to be the result of host immune response against bacterial colonies in the subgingival plaque.(Merin, 2015) In many cases, systemic and environmental factors play a significant role in the disease progression. Common risk factors such as uncontrolled diabetes mellitus and smoking, contribute to periodontal destruction in genetically susceptible individuals by modifying the host’s immune reactions towards periodontal pathogens. Clinically, the diagnosis of chronic periodontitis is made based on the presence of supragingival and subgingival plaque and calculus, signs of gingival inflammation, periodontal attachment loss and radiographic bone loss. Chronic periodontitis can be further classified based on the extent and severity of periodontal destruction. Localised chronic periodontitis is diagnosed when less than 30% of the sites are affected; whereas the generalised form of the disease affects more than 30% of the sites. The severity of the disease is determined by the amount of clinical attachment loss. It is classified as mild, moderate or severe when 1-2mm, 3-4mm or 5mm or more attachment loss is recorded respectively. (Merin, 2015)

According to paper published by Eke, Wei, Thornton-Evans, and Genco in 2012, about 47% of the sample representing 64.7 million adults aged 30 yr and older had periodontitis. Not only that, adults aged 65yr and older had higher percentage

Periodontitis can be caused by several different factors, some of which include poor oral hygiene, age, hormonal imbalance, genetics, smoking, diseases, vitamin C deficiency, drug induced gingivitis as well as ethnic

Orthodontic problems include excessive wear of gum tissue and dental surfaces. This can affect chewing function and cause misalignment of the jaw. Misalignment may also affect the underlying bone

There is now evidence to indicate; however, that the incidence of jaw lesions is proportionately far greater than this study would indicate. It is now recognized that some

A frequently cited study for the justification of the 3-month interval is Stanton et al (1969) time series study investigating the rate of wound healing of human gingivae by measuring hydroxyproline present in gingival collagen against time (N= 99). Their results yielded a 50% regeneration of collagen after 25 days. Through regression analysis their existing data, they extrapolated full connective tissue repair would require at least 49 days. Weaknesses with this study include inadequate follow up necessitating them to estimate their findings and their small sample size. As well, it did not relate directly to periodontal therapy, as their study only investigated wound healing following a gingivectomy. Canton et al (1982) investigated the maintenance of healed pockets following root planning to evaluate clinical stability of 128 periodontal pockets over the course of 3 months. They observed that across 4 to 16 weeks following root planning there was a

The epidemiological studies in caries do not show a consistent distribution for all tooth surfaces. The occlusal surface caries still show high prevalence compared to interproximal caries. The incidence of caries in the occlusal surfaces of the teeth constitutes more than two-thirds of all caries types. The propensity of occlusal caries to develop is closely related with the depth and morphology of the pits and fissures. Caries development is caused by the fact that bacteria and food accumulate in the pit and fissures and these areas cannot be cleaned properly due to the lack of both cleansing effect of saliva and mechanical cleaning (3).

Introduction: Occlusion has been described as the most important subject in all the disciplines of dentistry, since it represents the way the teeth come together, and functions together.

Though specific subject selection criteria are not mentioned in the article, subject selection bias is not observed as cases reported in this article include both sexes, age range reported is broad from 31 to 70 years old the location and clinical appearance of each oral lesion were different. Author has reported and discussed each case and analyzed similarities and differences in all case reports. As per my opinion this study has following issues: