preview

Persimmon Case Summary

Decent Essays
Open Document

Sales growth is defined as the increase in a company’s sales over a particular period of time, usually given as a percentage. It is better for the company to have a higher sales growth. The sales of Barratt increased by 16.9% in one year from 2013 to 2014, while the sales of Persimmon grew by 23.4%. Persimmon performed better than Barratt in terms of sales growth during that period of time.

Gross profit growth is defined as the increase in company’s gross profit over a year, usually given as a percentage. The higher the gross profit growth is, the better it is for the company. The gross profit of Barratt increased by 47.38% from 2013 to 2014, while the gross profit of Persimmon increased only by 31.33%.

Operating profit growth is defined …show more content…

It basically shows the increase in the net profit of the company from the previous year. The net profit of Barratt increased by a staggering 308.84%, while the net profit of Persimmon increased only by 44.63%.

Gross profit margin ratio shows the amount of revenue which remains after paying the cost of products sold. The gross profit margin of Barratt in 2013 was 13.78% and in 2014 it was 16.77%. It means that Barratt used 13.78% of its revenue to cover the direct costs and the remaining amount of revenue could be used for operating expenses in 2013. In 2014 Barratt gross profit margin increased by 2.99% in comparison with the previous year. The gross profit margin of Persimmon in 2013 was 20.87% and it grew to 22.22% in 2014.

Operating profit margin measures a company's pricing strategy and operating efficiency. The operating profit margin of Barratt was 9.59% in 2013 and it was 12.98% in 2014, therefore Barratt got 9.59 pence before paying interest and tax for every pound of sales in 2013 and 12.98 pence in 2014. The operating profit margin of Persimmon was 16.33% in 2013 and it grew to 18.08% in

Get Access