Honestly, in regard with my feelings from watching it, I don’t have much to say about “GUESS WHO’S COMING TO DINNER?”, because the main message the director: Stanley Kramer, script writer: William Rose and actors: Spencer Tracy, Sidney Poitier, and Katharine Hepburn, and features Hepburn's niece Katharine Houghton are trying to convey; (the racism and interracial marriage in the USA) are truly distant to me personally. In my country of origin and furthermore, in our national history, we never experienced slavery in the form that was presented in the western cultures, moreover for over five hundred years between 14th and 19th centuries my country Bulgaria was enslaved by the Turkish Empire, so I may to certain extend relay to what a “slave” …show more content…
Firstly, the main characters the couple: - She - Katharine Houghton as Joanna "Joey" Drayton is white and wealthy, not much more about her, tried to be presented as girl next door, but was she really? I don’t think so. - He - Sidney Poitier as Dr. John Wayde Prentice Jr. - intelligent, handsome, expert scientist, servers in United Nation Committees, very wealthy, living in many countries. COME ON!!!! Is this really a movie representing a staggering and important issue or we are watching production of Disneyland pampered and covered all over with sweet powder, IS THIS DEPICTION OF WHAT REASL LIFE OR JUST STORY TELLING? Why we don’t look back and see what we learn in EASY RIDER and FIVE EASY PIECES for the pretty much same time-period. Furthermore, if you force yourself over the explosion of “sweet powder” thrown over everything that move or not in the movie you can still be shocked of the one-sided way everything is depicted, “GOD FORBIT” someone tell or act in a real, like a life way acting and “offend” the ruling and dominant class in this case the white people. Why the colored person in this act should be so high rated and depict as in a way “Einstein” to be suitable to partner with a white
Despite the fact that there are so many Disney films that are (and should be) criticized for their social imperfections, there have been some recent signs of
This movie was a huge breakthrough for Disney, helping them complete a top of the charts, thriving movie that addresses that anyone can do whatever they set their mind to no matter who you are.
This movie gives us a perfect example of how a conflict was not handled effectively because assumptions were made, the character jumped to conclusion, due to this the issue became worse than it should have been. The communication dynamics in this was always done through someone else therefore one person would get upset, because he misunderstood the person that was giving him information.
This movie Directed by Paul Haggis who also directed Academy Award Winning "Million Dollar Baby" and had also won an Academy Award for this movie as well puts a twisted story in this film. This movie is trying to symbolize what goes on in the world today in regards to racism and stereotypes. He tries to make a point on how societies view themselves and others in the world based on there ethnicities. This movie intertwines several different people's lives, all different races, with different types of beliefs. Such ethnicities include Caucasians, African Americans, Hispanics, Asians and Middle Eastern. This movie includes conflicts on both sides of the picture from cops and criminals as well
I was very bothered by the comments Anita Bryant made during a televised speech that was shown in the film. She was an orange juice sales woman who was working to repeal laws that protect homosexual human rights; specifically in employment and housing. She described homosexuality as “tearing down the foundation of the family unit” and compared gays to prostitutes and thieves. She tried to convince the public that the traditional family was being threatened and that practicing or accepting homosexuality was blasphemy.
The motion picture begins with a riot after a white storeowner slaughters a dark young person. This episode underscores the
The movie's success depends on using dated stereotypes: "angry black woman," "thuggish black man," and "innocent" white women. White men,
The degree of connection between all of the characters in the movie is so coincidental and interrelated to emphasize the point that we do not always know what is going on with everyone else we may encounter. It also accentuates the fact that racism is not one particular race against another. It also shows that we never know someone’s situation and what is happening in their life to make them act the way that they do if
Since slavery, crimes committed on black bodies have been blatantly ignored and deemed unimportant. This put in place a precedent and is a big step for American society. In the movie, a Nazi and shooter at the protest shows his change of
The reason many people in America today, as well as in the movie are racist is because this is how they were brought up, by the labels they were taught to live by. Past generations were exposed to segregation between ethnic groups, which has greatly carried on to how people look at others today. Up until 1967 it was prohibited for blacks to marry white people in 38 states
The emotional reaction that the filmmakers intended for anyone who watch this film is that no matter what skin, hair and eye color is no one deserves to be labeled. No race should be discriminated and criticize. We should all get along and just be proud of where our roots come from. This film also intended for everyone who watch this film, is that there should not have to be obstacles to be proud of your own race.
A scene in the movie that best depicted the racism and the violence was the scene outside the Little’s family house, a black family. In this scene the black legion starts to pass around gasoline cans and then flames roar through the room and the Little kids are hysterical. Louise, the wife, rushes in and pushes them past the fire, she has infant in hand covered in a blanket. They barely make it outside when they are confronted by a black legion member who threatens them and tells them to leave the community.
The film “Guess who’s coming to dinner” surprised me. It was surprised me that a white girl and a black man would get married. It was surprising because in the 1960’s it wasn’t normal for a white and black person to get married. It surprised me that the mom was okay with their marriage so easily because I expected the mom to be like the dad and say no, but the mom was okay with her daughter marrying a black man because she knew it would make her happy. It stood out to me that Joanna didn’t care what her parents thought and told her parents that they were still going to get married even if they said no. It stood out to me that they were getting married so fast because I thought everything was happening really fast too just like their parents.
Kevin Rodney Sullivan's 2005 movie is an overt comedy that, while not ignoring the race issues altogether, uses them more frequently for humor than to illustrate serious points. Both film’s premises are about the same situation of an interracial marriage.
[1] Before I start this essay, I feel the need to remind the reader that I find slavery in all its forms to be an oppressive and terrible institution, and I firmly believe that for centuries (including this one) bigotry is one of the most terrible stains on our civilization. The views I intend to express in the following essay are in no way meant to condone the practices of slavery or racism; they are meant only to evaluate and interpret the construction of slavery in film.