When I was a child, my mother kept her runes and tarot cards in the headboard of her bed. Sometimes I would go into her room, climb onto her bed and pull them out, carefully untying the sink coverings and look at each card, wondering if they could tell me my future. I was young, and I didn’t understand their meaning. I thought pulling the death card meant you were going to die, I thought the fool meant you were going to do something stupid, and if you got the Queen then you were going to spend the rest of your life living a life of luxury and comfort. My parents were never pushy when it came to anything spiritual, in fact my father being an Atheist meant that he was extremely silent on the matter, my mother would always answer any questions I had to the best of her ability, and would try to find answers for me if she didn’t know them herself. When I was six years old she took me to a church because she thought I should have a chance to see what that was like. It was Palm Sunday, and I remember …show more content…
I was trying, carefully, to explain and when I told her I believed that I don’t believe on God, but I believe that people are all connected she called me a Pantheist. I looked it up and while I felt perhaps there was something there for me, I still felt there was something missing from that statement. A few days later, I read a note from a woman who called herself a Druid. I was intrigued, and I looked up Druidism and found that as I was reading about it everything inside me was clicking. I have been searching for a very long time for a place where I can hold my tapestry of beliefs and feel like it has a name. I don’t understand why my mind feels like it needs to put a name to it, but this has weighed on me since I was young and after many years of searching for answers I feel like I have finally found something that might allow me the freedom to be whoever I need to be without constraint or
What is atheism? Why would someone be an atheist? Why do people fear and dislike atheism? Simply stated, atheism is the lack of belief in a god or gods. Granted, atheists are each individuals and undoubtedly each of them prescribe [to] many different philosophies on life, politics and morality as do Christians. However, though atheists may choose to gather collectively for whatever purpose, unlike Christianity, atheism is not a belief system. An individual who identifies himself as an atheist is merely stating that he does not believe in [the existence of] god or gods. Atheism, as indicated by its name, is the opposite of theism which is belief in at least one god; to include polytheism (belief in many or more than one god) and monotheism
Atheism is disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods, they reject religion as apart of not only a rejection of ignorance, but also a rejection of their religious family and association of religion itself, says Catherine L. and Caldwell-Harris who are published in the Department of Psychology for Boston University, Lesley College,University of Haifa, and Trinity College. This is a stark contrast to theism, which is the belief in god and is the case for many Americans. This demographic is about 83% of America’s population, according to the most recent census. About 16% of the population, or about 34,169,000 people are of an unaffiliated position, which would include Atheists,
In the article “ On Being an Atheist,” H.J. McCloskey attempts to inform his readers that the belief in atheism is a “much more comfortable belief” by effectively using a disdainful rhetoric towards theists and their faith. McCloskey delves into both the Cosmological and Teleological arguments, which within he criticizes the arguments and to further his argument against theism, he also presents the Problem of Evil and why evil cannot possibly exist with a perfect God being the creator of universe. What will be displayed in this essay are the counter-arguments to McCloskey’s criticisms and the attempt to discredit his claims that regard the “comfortable” position that lies within atheism and its arguments.
First of all, I am an independent person. An independent person is someone that is not anchored by another individual, place, or item. One aspect in my life that I reveal my independence is everyday starting when I wake up in the morning. Every morning I wake up naturally without an alarm clock. My body is my alarm clock and I don't need an object or another person to wake me up. After I wake myself up I will make my own lunch. During the warmer seasons I grown my own fruits and veggies to pack in my lunch. These foods include tomatoes, strawberries, green beans, peppers, onions, and potatoes. One year I attempted to grow my own blueberries but the deer ate my crops. Before school started I went
McCloskey in his article, "On Being An Atheist" claims that proofs or arguments which theists provide to support their belief “have no weight”. He speaks of this primarily in relation to the ontological argument, the argument which attempts to show that the very concept of God implies his reality. McCloskey believes that there is no point in debating on this particular proof because it has no bearing but the ontological argument serves as the very foundation for other arguments which supports and defends God’s existence. If not for the purpose of proving His existence, the ontological argument is still necessary because it distinguishes the characteristics of God whom we are defending. The first rule of philosophical discourse is clarity
Sadly, while I am usually kind and caring, I was being snarky in your case. The point is to wake you up.
1. McCloskey refers to the arguments as “proofs” and often implies that they can’t definitively establish the case for God, so therefore they should be abandoned. What would you say about this in light of my comments on the approaches to the arguments in the PointeCast presentation (Lesson 18)?
I became a Christian in 1982 while in high school. I had never attended church prior to Easter 1982. I found something interesting in the whole of the service and decided to read a Bible. The Bible made some sense to me. I had a few questions about some of the stuff that had happened and was given Evidence that Demands a Verdict by Josh McDowell. Well that answered most of my questions. I was also given Mere Christianity which answered more questions. I felt convicted by the Holy Spirit and asked G-d to come into my life and forgive me of my sins.
In Atheism: The Case Against God, George H. Smith refutes arguments that many Theists use to try and prove God’s existence. One example of this is what he describes as “The Argument from Life.” This argument is often referred to as the fine-tuning argument as it argues that the Universe that humanity is a part of is so unlikely, it is as if it has been fine-tuned by a supernatural force. Although Smith argues against this claim using a variety of arguments, he is ultimately unsuccessful in refuting it because an intelligent designer is a better explanation for life than chance.
I have a cold and he’s injured, so we are sitting on the wall in the room.
The belief in Gods has always existed throughout human’s recored history. Whether it be the Greek Gods: Apollo, and Zeus, or the Judeo-Christian God, believed by Christians in modern day society. The belief of God has always existed among humans, however, assuming God does not exist, what explains the cultural evolution of such a false belief, namely religion? I shall argue that the reason this false belief is successful is because it manipulates human nature better than any other belief by these three points: an avoidance of death (the soul), a sense of worth (knowledge), and a sense, or need of belief (faith).
In his article, On Being an Atheist, H.J. McCloskey tried to show that atheism is a more reasonable and comfortable belief than that of Christianity. McCloskey argued against the three theistic proofs, which are the cosmological argument, the teleological argument and the argument from design. He pointed out the existence of evil in the world that God made. He also pointed out that it is irrational to live by faith. In my response, I will argue that McCloskey’s article is one-sided and thus flawed in his conclusion that atheism is more comforting than Christianity and when one examines all the evidence, Christianity is truly a source for great comfort today.
In the article, “On Being an Atheist”, H.J. McCloskey discusses the reasons of why he believes being an atheist is a more acceptable than Christianity. McCloskey believes that atheism is a more rational belief versus having a God who allows people to suffer so he can have the glory. He believes to live in this world, you must be comfortable. The introduction of his article, he implements an overview of arguments given by the theist, which he introduces as proofs. He claims that the proofs do not create a rationalization to believe that God exists. He provides 3 theist proofs, which are Cosmological argument, teleological argument, and the argument of design. He also mentions the presence of evil in the world. He focuses on the existence
Generally, Tarot is a form of cartomancy. In a psychic reading with Tarot, the advisor will make use of divination cards to gain insight into one’s past, present and future. The whole deck of Tarot cards is considered as a powerful tool that can reflect the reality through pictures.
People in our society today who have the atheist point of view on religion, which is the belief that there is no god, are going against the so-called norms of society, and therefor are seen as deviant. Deviance is just an idea. Society determines what is deviant by the ideas they hold of what should be the norm. Atheism is seen as a negative deviance, or below the norm. They have a status that is placed on them in society. It doesn’t necessarily mean that they believe in evil, although that is how it is sometimes viewed from people in society who have a specific religion or faith. Atheism, which is not a new idea, has been evolving in our society, and is the reason for problems leading to debate and court cases, and for