Personal Narrative Essay: The Power Of The FBI

With this over the years the FBI has been given a large amount of authority to serve and protect. Doing so the FBI has been

Apple’s iPhones are incredibly hard to hack, that the FBI can't even get in it themselves! Annoyingly, iPhone users are in trouble because the FBI is trying to get Apple to unlock an iPhone. Frighteningly, there are extremists that use iPhones to store their information in them, and if the FBI gets their hands on them, all iPhone users will be in trouble. The problem is that they don't have the right to break into somebody’s iPhone, and Apple doesn't have the information about the gunman in their database. Unfortunately, It seems the only way the FBI will get the information of lawbreakers is if they hack into their iPhones. Apple has to allow the FBI to unlock iPhones, because, they can use the information from

The fight between the apple and the fbi brought much controversy. Many said it was apple’s patriotic duty to help stop more potential terrorist attacks but they don’t understand the danger involved. The fbi asked apple to weaken their security system to hack into the iphone of one of the san bernardino shooter and then once they were done they could patch it up or just give access to law enforcement. But even with the weakened security it would have taken years to access the information and you can't just have certain people have access. As hackers will also get access stealing people’s personal information. And it would never end as countless law enforcement divisions have hundreds of iphones that need to be unlocked. So

“We have identified the body of Pamela Zimmerman, and we suspect there is foul play. The Bloomington-Normal Police Department is doing everything they can: I am sorry.” These words from a police officer are permanently etched into my head. Those simple fifteen words play on repeat throughout my head a multitude of times throughout the day, sometimes never leaving my head. As the wise holocaust survivor Viktor E Frankl once said, “When we are no longer able to change a situation- we are challenged to change ourselves.” I woke up on November Fourth, 2015 thinking it was going to just be a normal day; little did I know that I was about to be hit with news that would change my life forever.

The FBI feels that with the sheer magnitude of the attack, it is their moral obligation to do a thorough investigation, leaving no loose ends. They also hope that the iPhone may hold information that can help prevent future attacks. Both these views are expressed in their press release: “The San Bernardino litigation isn’t about trying to set a precedent or send any kind of message. It is about the victims and justice. Fourteen people were slaughtered and many more had their lives and bodies ruined. We owe them a thorough and professional investigation under law… Maybe the phone holds the clue to finding more terrorists.” (James Comey). In this passage from the FBI’s national press release, FBI director James Comey explains that their foremost concern is justice for the victims of the attack. The legal battle is not over privacy or precedent, but rather the investigation that the victims of the attack

On 11/21/2016, I, William Van Scoter, was working as a police officer for the Wichita State University Police Department, in Wichita, Sedgwick County, Kansas. I had the North Wichita Police Department (WPD) on my car radio and they were looking for a black male wearing all black clothes with red shoes. The black male was wanted for a domestic violence incident. I heard over the radio that WPD requested Officer Gable #152 to help locate the individual.

Even though we never know what they are doing, The FBI has the right to invade people's privacy. All of this doesn't sound right at all but if they had the right they would be able to stop danger before it occurred. The FBI can’t take this has a fun game because not everyone wants to be watched by the government. We deserve our own privacy and that’s really important now days. Everything we do is maintained by them, so it’s really important for them to keep there job series and our privacy as secret like it’s their own. So we believe that the FBI should have the right to invade people's’ privacy because people are continuously taking advantage of their personal information privacy,thinking that what they are doing is right but they are not realizing that what they are putting themselves in danger and the FBI itself. The world itself needs protection and little things like this going around, we

The start of the FBI began during the Roosevelt’s presidency in 1908, where he requested that an investigative branch be fashioned under the Department of Justice. This branch would focus on the law-breaking committed and collect the necessary information needed to come to a conclusion as to how and why the offense was committed. At the time, the investigation branch was headed by Chief Examiner Stanley Finch.

While the stated intentions of the FBI are well meant, the backlash from the public suggests that both Apple and the people are concerned about violations of privacy. While the FBI claims to want the access just to search the suspects’ phones, it is believed that they could then use that information to hack into others. Another current news event that is putting the government in a negative light is the coverage of the upcoming elections. Because most of the coverage tends to be negative, candidates involved in the current campaign as well as current politicians are being cast in a less than favorable light, and at this point many people are having a difficult time deciding which candidate to vote

As you are aware, on December 2, 2015 a terrorist attack took place at the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino, California in which 14 civilians were killed and 22 others were seriously injured. On February 9, 2016 the FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) announced that it was unable to unlock one of the mobile phones they recovered, an Apple I-phone issued by the county of San Bernardino to the shooter Syed Rizwan Farook due to its advanced security features. (Volz, Dustin; Hosenball, Mark (February 9, 2016). "FBI director says investigators unable to unlock San Bernardino shooter 's phone content". Reuters). The FBI requested from Apple Inc., a multinational technology giant, that they create a new version of the phone’s operating system that could be installed and run in the phone’s random access memory to disable certain security features. This would effectively create a back door into the I-phone. Apple turned down the FBI’s request due to a security concern. Thus began a fight between the United States Government and Apple Inc. over breaking encryption and government intrusion. The clash reflects wider debates in the United States and elsewhere over security measures used by companies to protect users of devices such as smartphones — and how much leverage authorities should have to gain

If an FBI agent has arrived at my office with a search warrant in hand I will ask the agent to present identification. I will then record the agent name and contact information. I will call the federal agency to vertify that agent is their employee. Once everything comes back clear. I will notify my Corporate Compliance Officer, CEO, Director, Public Relations and CNO. Once once everyone is there then we will take agent to a private room and see what search warrant is for. I will have to make sure we understand what the warrant is wanting. I will make sure that only Corporate compliance officer is handling and passing information to federal agents. Any information the agent is take should be documented from COOF and signed off that was

“And this woman's case stands she broke the law and she committed the worst crime which is a death” Is there any objections”

My name is April Weston and I am a crime analyst. My work revolves around reviewing police reports every day with the goal of identifying patterns of, analysis of, and solutions to patterns, trends, and problems in crime and disorders as they emerge.

December 2, 2015, San Bernardino, 1 year ago Friday a mass shooting and attempted bombing to place in our own state of California. Such attacks as this has become increasingly more frequent occurrence in the United States, with it there comes a dilemma that detectives judges, and federal agents have to go through after such attacks. “Should tech companies release encrypted devices information under a warrant?” Right after the attack on San Bernardino there was criticisms that the major tech company Apple should in fact give the police the data on the phone,after major back and forth it was clear Apple was not interested in doing so. They ended up settling on stopping the phone from deleting data after many incorrect attempts. James B Comey of the FBI in a statement to the Washington Post stated “It has been two months now, and we are still working on it,” (Ellen Nakashima, Washington Post). After the FBI requested Apple to break into the phone there was a number of controversies going along with it, I personally believe that if it is in a dire situation such as the San Bernardino attack then yes, tech companies should help the FBI before another major occurrence happens. However I don 't mean that after every crime or situation try to access someone phones, this would be a clear invasion of someone 's property. We also shouldn 't respond to a fearful situation so hastily, but if need be and there is evidence that in

As an illustration, I was a regular guy walking around the sidewalk of Staten Island.