1. Central Asia: Personal Narrative of Josiah Harlan
a. Josiah Harlan, an American famous for his adventures in India and Afghanistan, writes about the social situation of Afghanistan in the early 1800s. He has extensive notes about Hazara culture, although his writings are clearly affected by prejudiced racial and religious attitudes common in the West at the time. He certainly expresses his disapproval of Islamic ways, so his observations may not be fully reliable, but his observations of Hazarajat allow me to reconstruct the religious life of the Hazaras in this time period, albeit with some possible error due to his bias.
2. Oral Histories
a. I plan to use oral history accounts from active members of the American Hazara community to highlight
…show more content…
The author discusses the religion of the Hazaras in very little detail. He does, however, highlight how Shiism is a major differentiating factor for Hazaras and often serves as the main difference between them and the other tribes of Afghanistan. Also, the author strongly rejects the notion that Shiism brings Hazara groups closer to other Shiites abroad, essentially suggesting Hazaras are fiercely distinct from other Afghans and other Shiites. My research contradicts this point, as it shows how Hazaras tend to form networks that interweave with other Shiite groups, becoming a part of the fabric of Western Shiism. The author, by taking this position, is also implicitly suggesting that ethnic identity is significantly more important to most Hazaras in the West than religious identity, which I also plan to …show more content…
This book provides historical information about Hazara Mujahideen groups and political parties from the 1980s to present. The author suggests that these parties have strong Iranian ties due to similar religious beliefs. He essentially suggests that the parties are in complete harmony with Iran. I plan to show that these parties exercised significant degrees of autonomy and were not merely Iranian puppets.
4. Guardians of Shi’ism
a. The author here focuses on the international nature of many organizations of prominent Grand Ayatollahs. He shows how these institutions form international networks for the scholars who found them. I plan to expand on this idea, showing how these organizations in turn produce international networks for their members. That is to say, I plan to show how Shiites, Hazaras specifically, use these networks to form international relationships for various purposes, including increasing aid work in Afghanistan and creating contacts with Hazaras across the world.
5. Hazara Integration into the Afghan
Afghanistan is a culture-rich land consisting of many ethnic tribes. The largest of these groups is the Pashtun tribe which constitutes an estimated 40% to 55% of Afghanistan’s total population. The third largest group in the country is the Hazara tribe which comprise between 15% of the population (Barfield 26). Historically, the Hazara people have been largely persecuted by other tribes in Afghanistan. In Martin Ewan’s book, Afghanistan: A Short History of Its People and Politics, he writes, “There has in the past been little love lost between [the Hazaras] and other Afghans, who despise them on both religious and racial grounds, while they themselves have a particular hatred
This is a trustworthy source of understanding Hazara people. All the information regarding Hazaras is published by Minority Right Group. Their mission is to help minorities around the world to have their voices heard. The source provides valuable point regarding struggles faced by Hazara. In addition,
While the aftermath of World War II is often referred to as one of the primary creators of deep rooted turmoil in the Middle East region, the effects of the Cold War and the United States often over-zealous battle against communism is just as much a contributor if not more. The Arab world and the Middle East region were clearly going through quite an extraordinary period throughout World War II and its conclusion, primarily with the creation of most of the states we recognize today and struggling with the continuation of colonialism. These factors set the stage for the emergence of strong nationalist sentiments and Pan-Arab movements across the Middle East. Unfortunately, and much to the detriment of the region, the leaders of these young
Assef a local radical provides a chilling insight into the radicalism exhibited in some individuals in Afghanistan and how they have distorted views of the
3. Hazaras are servants. They don’t get educated and usually spend most of their lives serving the wealthy. Ali and Hassan, who are Shi’a Muslims, have been the only Hazaras introduced so far.
Hosseini begins to show the loss of innocence and the effects of the conflict with the Soviet takeover. “The generation of Afghan
Afghanistan, a country of several ethnic backgrounds, is in constant struggle of standing united as a nation. The various beliefs, languages, social statuses, and ways of living have created tension among the ethnic groups (“Social Classes”). The Pashtuns and Hazaras are two particular ethnic groups that have clashed throughout history. The differences between the Pashtun and Hazara people created a major conflict with lasting effects on the way in which they live.
In Khaled Hosseini’s book The Kite Runner, one of the most surprising motifs is of ethnic division and violence in Afghanistan. The groups that commit such acts , though brutally primitive, have deep set reasons and justifications for their actions. In totality, ethnic violence is an enduring problem for humanity that is due to differences that exist between people of various cultures and ancestry as well as foreign intervention from world powers.
The [Bush] administration found it consistently difficult to get the measure of Tehran. Bush depicted it as a “nation held hostage by a small clerical elite that is repressing and isolating its people,” but the reality was far more complex. (482)
Before the Soviets invaded Afghanistan, race and wealth defined power. At the bottom of the socioeconomic ladder were the Hazaras. The Hazaras had no power at all and some even thought they were a disgrace to Afghanistan, like Assef believed “Afghanistan is the land of Pashtuns. It always has been, always will be. We are the true Afghans, the pure Afghans, not this flat nose here. His people pollute our homeland, our watan. They dirty our blood.” (Hosseini 33).
As Michael Axworthy states on the back cover of his book, A History of Iran: Empire of the Mind, Iran is a “land of contradictions”. As this is true these contradictions is what makes Iran, Iran. Iran today is looked as the pinnacle of the Islamic faith in the form of a Government structure. Since 1979, Iran has been known as the Islamic Republic of Iran and Iran will continue being an Islamic Republic for centuries to come. Iran has a rich history of intellectuals and scholars. Iran is known for its vibrant culture that dates back longer than the Western Ideals were even conceived. However Axworthy asks a question about Iran and its impact on the world’s history and the current events that we see in Iran today, Axworthy asks “Is Iran an aggressive power, or a victim?” This statement is a true paradox, can Iran be the next Nazi Germany, the next Soviet Union or the next Great Islamic Caliphate or is Iran just fighting to keep its culture alive from a vast array of attacks from foreign entities and internal struggles.
Anyone who has even the slightest clue about anything related to world news has the basic understanding that Iran is a major player in the world of politics. From miscellaneous missile launches to disputes with other foreign nations, they have strong armed their way onto the international stage. Iran has become the largest threat in the Middle Eastern region as a result of the efforts of their fairly infant Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). Plunging in for a closer look, the strength of the IRGC impresses not only politics, but the socioeconomic culture of Iran but not in the most positive fashion.
Afghanistan’s national anthem identifies 14 cultural groupings among the list of the nation 27 million individuals: Pashai, Pashtuns, Aimaq, Tajiks, Qizilbash, Hazaras, Brahuis, Uzbeks, Gujars, Balochis, Arabs, Nooristanis, Pamiris, as well as Turkmens (Salem Press Encyclopedia, 2013). Several groupings tend to be native to Afghanistan; the majority of the bigger ones possess considerably higher masse within nearby nations. Regulating a viable state with such demographics happens to be a key problem. Sustaining tranquility between these types of groupings is among the greatest issues facing Afghanistan these days and also a crucial determinant of whether or not the foreseeable future will be considered one of
Since the 4th century, the Persian world has held great might in world politics. In 1979, Iran was officially established and the Islamic Republic of Iran. Since then it has been an active and vocal player in world politics. It’s rich history of political revolutions have inspired new waves of government control, tyrannical and benign leaders, and great cultural change over time. The strong religious beliefs expressed by the people of this nation are both a form of unity and disunity that cause widespread schisms within this state. As a theocratic republic, the intermingling of religion and government within the state has caused a very controversial history for this nation. Since the late 70’s the influence of a Supreme Leader as well as a government headed by a president rather than a Shah, Iranians have experienced times of great oppression and great change. These studies of Iran have lead to the conclusion that within world politics, government leadership, diplomatic relations, mutual trust and geopolitical relations are main factors in a country’s ability to function internally and communicate with other nations.
En 1970, le gouvernement de Muhammad Reza Shah, le chef d’état autocrate de l’Iran ratifia le traité de non-prolifération nucléaire en insistant sur l’importance de son propre développement d’un programme nucléaire dans un cadre purement pacifique pour l’Iran. Depuis ce temps, l’histoire a modifié grandement cet état central du bassin arabe. En effet, en 1979, la révolution islamiste atteint son paroxysme avec le début de l’exil de Muhammad Reza Shah, et le retour d’exil de l’ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeiny. Ce dernier voyait l’Iran comme la mainmise de l’occident dans les affaires de la région du Moyen-Orient et conséquemment la raison de la perte de l’identité islamique de l’Iran et de sa population. Le but de la révolution islamique de