preview

Personal Narrative: The Oregon Shooter

Decent Essays

Anyone who values the lives of other humans so little that he or she is willing and make the decision to kill, is the true scum of the Earth. They deserve no fame and no recognition for what they did. Now putting their faces on the news does have it benefits too, letting everyone know that there will be punishment, and his or her face can be a target at the gun range. So both sides have some good points, but I believe Sheriff John Hanlin is right when he didn’t put the name and face up of the Oregon shooter, he believes that keeping the identity hidden will help cut down on his or her glorification. Instead we should promote heroes and put them in the newspapers. The Oregon shooting saw one such example when army veteran, Chris Mintz, charged the shooter and was shoot seven times …show more content…

The media has double standards for who commits the crimes. Think about it, when that kid shot up the black church in the beginning of summer it was rightfully labeled as a race issue; but when a muslim shoots eleven Christians in Oregon the gun is completely responsible. Another good comparison would be the Charleston shooter and the muslim who shot up the marine recruitment office. The day before the recruitment office got shot up ISIS tweeted about dead marines, but he was considered a “lone wolf,” while the Charleston shooter, who was an actual lone psychopath, represents everyone who is white, Christian, and lives in the south. Or how come when a black person gets killed by a cop we see Oboma address him, riots, looting, and white people being targeted. But if a cop or soldier killed in the line of duty is killed no one bats an eye. All of these examples lead to copycat killings, when a cop is shot in the line of duty it inspires other trash to kill cops. Just this summer we had eleven cops killed by ambush methods. Changing the media to promote the murderers less and the heroes more is the first step in helping to stop mass

Get Access