Personal Reflection Essay

My peer’s feedback was helpful to me by that my peer had some helpful comments about my paper that I used to help me edit my paper to make it better. Your feedbacks were very helpful because they showed me where do in my paper I need to pay attention more and what am I doing wrong that would make my paper look bad. It also helped know about parts in my paper where I need to add more of to make my paper address things that needs to be addressed. For example, I didn’t know that there were band members in the Audi ad, which made me write a counterargument about having celebrities in their ad like the Honda ad. The feedbacks from you and my peer were

Receiving peer feedback can often be taken as offensive and harsh. However, the information on our performance that we receive is very constructive. It assists us with the way that we do our jobs, and what things we should change to improve. At times, it may feel as if everything we do is wrong. But, I solely believe that there is always room for improvement.

Peer review is more than just reading someone’s paper and tell them if it’s good or bad. It’s about explaining them what their weaknesses and strengths are. It can also help you as a writer by giving you ideas of how to put stuff together in your essay. Personally, I believe that I was really engaged when it came to peer reviewing. I truly appreciated the criticism and honesty of my peers and I hope that they feel the same way about me. I tried to explain to them what was wrong with each page step by step and what are some of their weaknesses and strengths.

INSTRUCTIONS: Peer Reviews will be conducted in class discussion forums during Week 7. Be sure to review the Lecture and the Discussion area for additional details and guidance. Please complete the following steps below, returning a separate peer review worksheet for each of the two classmates whose papers you review.

| |the intellectual conversation of topics that were discussed. I also enjoyed the learning |

The results of Rieber's study (2006) strongly support his views. He compared the average grades of students who did not undergo peer review to the average grades of those who had directed peer review. The results showed that the second group who had peer review did significantly better than those who did not have peer review. Hence, such studies affirm that peer review, when do appropriately, can help the students improve their written performance. Moreover, a study by Yang, Badger, and Yu (2006), showed that teacher feedback was less successful than peer correction, probably in light of the fact that Peer correction incite uncertainty, the teacher correction indicated that it is associated with confusion and miscommunication, while peer correction promotes students to discuss and gained a deeper knowledge of the topic.

During this peer review assignment, we were assigned two individuals to give us feedback on our papers. The two individuals who read over my paper was Kelsie Brooks and Ashlyn York, they both explained what my paper was written over, then they provided me helpful feedback on what to add or revise throughout the paper. Brooks explained how I needed to elaborate more on the paragraph about memories, and York wrote how I should fix my grammatical errors. So, therefore, I added more to the paragraph about memories, revised some sentences, and corrected a lot of my grammar within sentences.

One important lesson that I learned after getting certified as a sniper is the importance of selecting and adjusting a quality trigger. When shooting it’s important to have an adjustable trigger that will allow the shooter to have a light and crisp shot. In the military a heavier two stage trigger is used, and this aids a soldier with better accuracy under pressure and when using winter gloves. It allows the soldier to feel a little extra creep or bump before the shot breaks. If these rifles are used in the civilian market, the trigger may need replacement to accommodate the bench rest or sports shooter.

After watching, “No One Writes Alone”, the required video, I understand the process of peer review better. From past experiences with peer review, I found that people tend to only correct the grammar portions of the work instead of actually analyzing the paper as a whole. Classmates tended to not really care about the statement you were trying to make or how the paper flowed. I like the peer view for the fact that it helps me improve as a writer and improves my thought process as well. Although, I dislike how some people tend to criticize your view-point instead of not focusing on what they are supposed to do. I also dislike how some people can come of overly negative to you. I feel peer review should come off as friendly as possible. In general,

As always, the peer review session was extremely helpful. This time however, with the feedback I got, I decided to keep some of the main points but rewrite the majority of the essay. This left me with a lot of uncertainty with my final copy as I didn’t know if I solved the majority of the issues that the first draft contained or if I just created even more.

In Neubert and McNelis "Peer Response" it was concluded that feedback is kept in the minds of the students when revising their writing. The feedback givin by their peer is subconciouslly stored inside their minds resulting in them keeping a sharp lookout for said mistakes or improvements. In order for something like this to be effective, the givin advise by the peer has to be specific and well thougth out otherwise the student won't know what needs improvents. I have gotten plenty of bad advise during my high school years. The feedback isn't negative, but quick compliments such as "its okay" or "good use of commentary," this kind of feedback won't help improve my writing skills. This is the sort of feedback I have been reiceiving isn't effective

Once you have evaluated the entire piece it is best to focus on the narrow aspects of the assignment e.g. grammar, spelling, and word usage. It is helpful to follow the assignment criteria to ensure the writer has included all that was required and then address each aspect separately. Furthermore, provide constructive criticism by providing I statements (I enjoyed reading the part about peer assessment because….) and provide helpful suggestions and/or examples to the writer on how they could improve, this allows the student to grow. Provide reason to why you think something sounds good so the writer has an idea of what the reader felt they did right. At the end provide the writer with a briefly summary of your assessment in a short paragraph. But most importantly, remain open minded. In peer review this is very important because other people will not always have the same views as

The progress I have made in my ability to provide effective peer feedback is that I try as hard as possible to correctly see all the errors on the essay and make sure that the author knows about it and fix it for their original essay. This method really help out the author so that they know what they need to work on and to fix in their essay before they turn it in to the professor. I assist my fellow peers by improving their essay and therefore, it will make their essay stronger and better. The type of support I provide for my fellow peers are that I try to support them with good grammar mistakes and how to format their essay in MLA format before turning it in. I was able to collaborate with my peers by grouping up with them and talking and

I found the peer review process of this essay very helpful, not only with grammatical errors and tense usage, but also with the overall style of my essay. The next assignment was a second rhetorical analysis, which was actually my favorite of the semester, possibly because it also was the easiest for me, based on my past writing experience and what I learned from the first essay. I had learned that it was basically a paper with a lot of opinion but some facts or information from the sources provided in my point of view. I feel this helped develop my voice because it enabled me to learn how to summarize and paraphrase correctly, yet still reflect my concepts. At this point I also could clearly see the rhetorical situation in the assignment: the purpose was to provide an opinion on a subject matter that would theoretically influence someone on whether or not to believe in the authors view, the audience was my professor but also all my peers and anyone who might be interested in watching that subject.

During the evaluation, I was informed that most of my student evaluations were positive and contained comments suggesting that they learned a lot by taking my class. Also, I was informed by the members of the committee that there were some areas of improvement. I hope the following remarks demonstrate my willingness to improve and or resolve the areas of improvement mentioned in the meeting.