Personal Reflective Paper On Neo Ffi

After investing my 15 minutes on this test I found that this test was not credible at all. It was just a method of luring people to know about their personality and getting hits on their website. The test was utterly meaningless. The questions seemed to be simple yet direct in the beginning but later on they became repetitive and boring. There was nothing that could make me ponder over some aspect of my own persona.

Considering my personality, based on the “Big 5” personality traits, extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, and openness to experience, I scored on the high end of the moderate range. As for the openness to experience, I scored a 9 out of 10 ranging in the high level of personality factor (Project 2, BMAL-500 D, McGraw Hill Connect, Liberty University, 2017). I feel as if though this is accurate as I am generally outgoing and enjoy the company of others.

PLEASE REMEMBER – when taking personality tests, or any psychological tests, you typically need to respond based on your PREFERRED way of being, not necessarily how situations in the past have required / compelled you to be.

After taking the Big Five personality test, also known as the OCEAN model of personality, I found the results slightly surprising to me. The first measure they addressed was openness to experience/intellect, and I scored fairly low at the 20th percentile, meaning I prefer more traditional experiences and familiar experiences. The second one, which was conscientiousness, I scored higher on in the 74th percentile, meaning that I am well organized, self-disciplined, and reliable. The third measure of personality is extraversion, and I scored in the 96th percentile which extremely high. This suggests that I am extremely outgoing, social, and

After taking the two personality tests, I feel as though I definitely learned something about myself. The Jung typology test revealed that my personality type is INTJ, and while I was reading the description on the website I found that I could relate to almost everything in the description. What I read about this personality type helped me to understand a little bit about myself. For instance, the website said that most INTJs have trouble with personal relationships, due to their need for directness and sensibility. I often find myself confused and annoyed when people try to beat around the bush, I’m not one for taking hints, and now I can see that that quality is tied to my personality type.

In the end, I found that the personality test and the temperament that goes with it is accurate to a fault. The only issue that arose that I question is whether I am an extrovert or an introvert. Most of the time I have relate to both daily. I become overwhelmed with one or the other and I need to resort to the opposite. I need time to recharge because I have given all I possibly could at that moment.

The test itself was not what I had expected. When the test began it was simply a series of personal questions and questions about men and women within or out of the workforce. Initially, I believed the test would be a series of similar questions. When I was taken to the next screen for

First off this test was very difficult in the way that you had to make sure you were paying you undivided attention to it. By the third test I was seriously frustrated, and I’m not sure if these tests make others feel this way but it surely made me feel as such. Now for the positives, these tests are very interesting to take because they truly tell you have you feel about race, class, and gender that you wouldn’t know unless you took it.

The first subset of my personality is Extraversion, as opposed to Introversion. As an extrovert, I would describe myself as social, external and gregarious. This characteristic helps me communicate and reach out to others. However, there are cons that go along

Overall, I believe that the test was fairly accurate in measuring certain factors of my personality so much so that it was difficult for me to find certain factors that I did not agree with. However there were two factors, E (dominance) and Q1 (rebelliousness), which I believe were a bit overrated in myself. Aside from these the test seemed to adequately define facets of my personality. For “warmth” (factor A) my sten score read 4, indicating that I am slightly more reserved and critical that easygoing and good-natured. I scored a 7 in “ego strength” (factor C), classifying me as more stable and emotionally mature and less emotional and changeable in attitudes. In dominance (factor E) my sten score read 8, meaning I am more assertive, competitive and stubborn rather than submissive, dependent and humble. I received an average score of 5 in “impulsivity” (factor F) indicating a slightly more serious and sober approach to the world over the cheerful and enthusiastic view. As for “boldness” (factor H), I received a sten score of 4 signifying a more shy and restrained approach to things as opposed to an adventurous genial one. I received a median score of 5 for “emotional sensitivity” (factor I) demonstrating my slightly more tough-minded and self-reliant view in contrast to a sensitive insecure one. For “imagination” (factor M) a score of 8, indicating that I am more imaginative, unconventional and absorbed in ideas and am less so for practicality and the prosaic.

On the first survey, I scored 62.5 out of 100 in masculine points, 79 out of 100 feminine points, and 61.6 out of 100 androgynous points. I would say that this study does represent me fairly well. I am a feminine person, but do have some masculinity/androgyny in me. I enjoy adventuring, doing slightly risky activities (nothing too crazy), and I would say I am self-dependent. Self-dependence is a big one for me personally because I feel as though a lot of girls depend on men to help them. While I am not saying, I did not fall victim to that at one point, I do feel as though I have moved mostly passed it, and wish I could help other girls do the same. But with all of that, I do have the feminine side where I like everything to be clean, neat, and like to take care of myself. In

According to my IPIP-NEO narrative report I am a very independent, outgoing, calm, and curious person. My comprehensive report shows that I am: high scoring in openness, conscientiousness, and extraversion, average scoring in agreeableness and low scoring in Neuroticism. Raking in the 82nd percentile, extraversion was my second highest scoring trait. This means I am pretty outgoing, extraverted and love people. This is evident my scores of 89 in friendliness, 84 in assertiveness and 75 in activity level. Despite my high score in extraversion, I am on the lower side of average in the excitement-seeking facet with a score or 33. This means that even though I might like a little hustle and bustle and take charge I wont take to many risks and don’t always need a thrill to be satisfied.

Have I ever took a personality test that answer will be no I have not taking one but will like to take one to learn more about what type characteristic shape my personality. I would expect the personality test to show my caring ability, motivation levels and strength ability. Also I would like to test tell me about my social skills as a child I did not have good social skills now as a adult I have better social skills do to self confidence that I lack as a child. My personality has grown since I was a child. A personality test will open many doors to my colorful mind.

I learned plenty of things from my results. My values-which I didn't see clearly-are now clear, and I found out the little unique things that make up my personality. From my personality survey, I am mostly artistic,

Every individual has their own personality, that makes them who they are. After taking the personality inventory test, it came back stating that I have a consul personality. The results concluded that I was an extravert meaning that I am social, and observant over intuitive. I feel more than I think, judging over prospecting, and turbulent over assertive.