Personal Security Research Paper

First, we have those who make the claim the government upping its security measures and methods will violate our fourth amendment rights and individual freedoms; making the case that these security measures and methods are unconstitutional. Second, on the other side of the argument, are those that claim sacrificing some of our rights is necessary for the purposes of securing the nation (Stahl, 2006). To further complicate our discussion, there is an assumption made here that also needs to be addressed. The assumption is that you must choose either freedom or security, and that these two concepts cannot coexist and complement each other. To be truly free, you must be secure. To be truly secure, you must have freedom. Are we actually free if we have to live in fear of a constant threat that may attack at any moment? No, of course not. Are we actually secure without freedom? If we have all the security of a communist-like police-state, but do not have freedom to live our lives without oppressive rules and granted all of the rights of the constitution, then we in fact are not truly secure. The key to solving this is there must be a balance between the two concepts. How do we accomplish this balance of freedom and security responsibly and lawfully? The answer is to stick to and uphold the Constitution of the United

Finally, security loses its worth if not accompanied by rights. Benjamin Franklin states that "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither liberty or safety" Without Liberty, Security is purposeless. The entire purpose of national security is to protect the American way of life and what our nation

Benjamin Franklin, one of the founding fathers of the United States, once said “Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” In America’s society today, some are willing to sacrifice their civil liberties in order to gain protection and security

Since the founding of the United States of America, freedom has been the basis of the governmental and ruling systems in place. Individual freedoms are protected in both the Bill of Rights and the rest of the Constitution, and Schwartz (2009) explains that ‘public liberty ultimately enhances collective rationality—it is a path to heightening our wisdom by increasing access to pertinent information and improving decision making’ (p. 409). However, there have been many times in history when the true freedom of citizens is called into question. There has always been controversy about how much power the government should have, who is keeping the government in check, and if citizens are properly informed about what their elected governed are doing. The passing of the Patriot Act in 2001 was no exception to this controversy. The

Information Security: Detroit Hospital Security Breach CMGT441: Introduction to Information Systems Security TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................... 3 INCIDENT BACKGROUND................................................................................................... 3 REACTION TO INCIDENT.................................................................................................... 3 FUTURE RECOMMENDATIONS......................................................................................... 4 Training Classes.................................................................................................................... 4 Secured Property Location.................................................................................................... 4 Access Cards.......................................................................................................................... 5 Electronic Shut-Down

They say majority rules and that couldn’t be more true in our society today. In order for the minority to be protected by the majority the U.S Constitution was written. Amendments in the constitution were put together to protect the U.S citizens. Federalist papers were written by James Madison, go

I strongly believe that the Patriot Act is unconstitutional; hence, I would say the government is acting illegally. Further, the book notes that the NSA put gag orders on several companies to prevent them from sharing their policies and procedures. The book also notes that even after certain laws and

Let us look at rights that are supposedly preventing us from being secure. The 4th amendment gives “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” This in essence protects us from the threat of constant searches.Probable cause is strict. Our founding fathers thought it was important that the person you intend to search probably is doing something wrong even if we are afraid of them. The argument against this is

A man that goes by the name of “Paul Ryan” once stated, “We believe, as our founders did, that ‘the pursuit of happiness’ depends upon individual liberty; and individual liberty requires limited government’”. In fact, at the Constitutional Convention, in order to protect against giving the central government too much power, the delegates added the Bill of Rights to the Constitution in which these individual liberties are as stated in it . The Bill of Rights are the first ten amendments of the United States Constitution that guarantees legal and civil rights of the citizens. The Founders had high hopes of these individual liberties that were promised to the people. However, the government, which was supposed to have a limited power or say in this, has been attempting to compromise these liberties with sugar coated words such as they are doing this in the name of security or general welfare for the people by taking advantage of our desire for security.

Often our nation sees as a symbol of freedom to the world; however, since the events of 9/11 the U.S congress signed into law the U.S Patriot Act. This legislation extends the power of the government by strengthening its oversight authority over the nation, claiming protection of the national security against potential foreign threats. As an American citizen, I agree with some of the terms and measures adopted under the Patriot Act in which the government needs to intercept, obstruct, and monitor terrorism actions keeping us safe from potential attacks without violating any of our civil rights. However, the act fails to secure American liberties, facilitating and encourages the government to become authoritarian with the pretext idea of national security purpose, exposing millions of Americans lives to serious and potential abuses of corruptions, fraud and discrimination by taking away our freedoms and liberty rights guarantee by the U.S Constitution, assuming that giving politicians authoritarian powers will make America a safer place to live. On the Other hand as a Law abiding citizen I’m not willing to sacrifice and been taking away my constitutional rights in exchange for national security purpose, because if we continue like that, we would be further away from an ideal democracy society, losing confidence and support to our government system that eliminates the American ideal of check and balance power for their own ends.

President Bush intended through legislation, to aid federal agencies in identifying potential terrorists and to ultimately protect this country from possible potential terrorist attacks in the future (Banks, 2010). Both individuals in power and ordinary citizens were greatly supportive of giving up certain liberties and privacy in order for the protection of the greater good. However, The Patriot Act was extremely controversial and advocates feared that power could be abused and that non-threatening citizens were being examined for crimes in which were not terrorist related (Sievert, 2007). Additionally, the most controversial aspect of The Patriot Act was the fear of privacy in relation to the first and fourth amendment (Xhelili and Crowne,

The government of the United States takes the security of its Citizens very serious and this explains why security of USA Citizens home and abroad is their first line of duty. In the wake of 9/11 terrorism attack, the citizens were left questioning whether indeed the government was doing enough to protect them. On the same note, the Bush administration was shaken to the core that terrorist could advance that much into their soil. This formed the basis of various legislations and formation of special units with special powers to fight terrorism in and out of USA. However, some of these laws have brewed controversy among the Citizens it is supposed to protect. Some civil rights groups and liberal lawmakers are questioning the ability of these laws to be applied without hurting the Americans it is supposed to protect.

“A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have,” Gerald Ford (1974) said during his address to a joint session of Congress: a warning to the public about the consequences of giving the Government overwhelming control. After the U.S. gained their independence from the British Hegemony, the Founding Fathers of America adopted the Bill of Rights to protect the people from this very situation. The 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution clearly states, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people”. Nevertheless, by the 21st, the democratic, free nation of

8 Ways to Attack-Proof Your Home Introduction The average home isn’t anywhere near as secure as we’d like to think. Worse than that, the conventional wisdom that is passed off as “home security advice” is just about worthless. All it does is to help keep honest people honest—not keep the dishonest out. Why, you can kick the average front door with a deadbolt wide open!

In the last decade it’s amazing how technology has advanced over the years and will continue to advance for many years to come. Every year there is a new cell phone from Apple or Samsung, with new features that make our lives more convenient. From faster software to higher picture