Personality Assessment paper

Burger (2008), says that there are many theories of personality and psychologists try to explain it with their own approaches. Discussed here will be the psychoanalytic approach, the trait approach, the biological approach the humanistic approach, the behavioural/social learning approach and the cognitive approach. They were devised to search for specific patterns in behaviour and ways of thinking about these

Over the last 100 years, the underpinning concepts in the fields of psychology and counseling were wrought. Within this period, these concepts have transformed and evolved from somewhat crude conceptions of the psyche toward more holistic interventions and approaches. As the profession continues to move forward, adaptations of the original theorists regarding the nature of man and the development of personality continue to emerge. These adaptations, along with the integration of new concepts and ideas, continue to contribute to the field. The author describes his view of man and human nature, personality development, and explores potential implications for counseling.

Feist, J., Feist, G. J., & Roberts, T. (2013). Theories of personality (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Personality and how we behave have been of much interest to psychologists for a long time now and because of this there have been many theories and theorists that have been developed. Personality is defined as consistent behavior patterns and intrapersonal processes originating within and individual (Fritzley, 2012, p. 10). There are six main approaches to personality psychology they include: biological approach, humanistic approach, behaviorist approach, trait approach, psychoanalytic approach and cognitive approach. Each approach shines a little light onto why we behave the way we do and how our personalities are formed, the approaches contain many different theories from

Psychoanalytical theory approach would not view human motivation as Maslow. The psychoanalytic theory place human motivation as an individual’s sexuality and aggression (McAdams, 2006). In psychoanalysis the person talks about they are experiencing with a therapist who

However with advantages come disadvantages. For example, with correlational studies there is no background information obtained. Therefore, the reliability of the correlational studies is questioned.

In taking the Big Five Personality Test, I find the results to be consistent with my personality. According to the results, I am a conventional and down to earth person that is very well-organized and can be relied upon. Furthermore, I am a nervous and quiet person with the tendency to be mean and rude to others. These findings are pretty accurate because I know for a fact that I am a very well-organized person with no intention of being center of attention in a room full of people. Furthermore, my friends are always telling me that I am rude and harsh on certain things. Finally, I prefer to see things realistically rather than using my imagination and being creative.

a. According self tests using the Five Factor Model, my personality has low extraversion and emotional stability, a high degree of openness, and moderate levels of agreeableness and conscientiousness. Low extraversion is demonstrated in both professional and social envionments. While working a corporate job as a financial analyst, taking the time and initiative to interact with coworkers beyond the scope of the job was limited to a brief conversation once a day with the same two people. In large social gatherings, interactions are limited to familiar people with whom I have pre-existing friendships. If I attend a concert by myself, I will bring a book to read in between musical acts to prevent people from speaking to me. Low emotional

My current employer offers an assessment that judges the candidates based on the hospital’s mission, values, and guiding behaviors. This is to ensure that the candidate selected will be successful adjusting to the culture of the organization. Although the purpose and goal of the assessment are to find the best candidate, I have been disappointed about several I have interviewed because they were not completely honest.

Richard M.Ryckman , Theories of Personality, Ninth Edition. 2008, 2004 Thomson Wadsworth, a part of The Thomson Corporation

A modified version of the Big 5 Personality Test was taken to assess my weaknesses and aptitudes for leadership. The test was designed to analyze 45 aspects of personality, such as listening skills, emotional stability, communication skills, critical thinking, motivation to lead, and conflict management styles. My answers suggest I have significant room for improvement in the areas of assertiveness and consideration for others. Conversely, my test results suggest I have significant strengths in the areas of emotional stability and critical thinking. The assessment appeared to adequately reflect my personality based on my own self-perception. Lessons learned from both the assessment and course material were integrated, which facilitated deeper critical thinking in the subjects of organizational behavior and leadership skill development. Finally, the subject of organizational behavior was discussed as it pertains to biblical teachings.

According to Dennis Coon and John O. Mitterer (2016), “psychologists use a large number of concepts and theories to explain personality” (p. 384). Traits are qualities that a person consistently exhibits to make up who they are. I took the personality survey on myself. Then I used four raters to compare how I view myself versus how others view my personality.

My Big 5 personality test results showed that I’m more closed minded, and prefer traditional and familiar experiences. It also states that I’m more “conventional, down to earth, narrow interests, and uncreative” (The Big Five Project Personality Test, n.d.). I do not agree with this at all. I actually find myself to be very opened minded, probably more opened minded then anyone I’ve ever met. My Jung test results identified me as an ENFJ, which illustrates a creative and idealistic personality. I think because the Big 5 personality test has fewer questions relating to this particular assessment, the test did not accurately capture my personality trade for being either closed minded or open to new experiences. I agree with the rest of my Big

The big five project personality test results are based on research to describe the five dimensions of human personality (big five). The five-big personality test is Open-Mindedness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness and Negative Emotionally (OCEAN). The OCEAN five personality test describe strengths and weaknesses that align with my personality. Thus the OCEAN results are based on percentile, the higher the percentile is considered strengths and the lower percentile represents weakness. My strengths are open-mindedness, conscientiousness, and extraversion. My weakness is agreeableness and negative emotions. The findings of my OCEAN test results below conclude:

re you worried that you and your partner are too different in order to have a successful relationship? Do you want to know how his personality matches up with yours? Have you considered a personality type test?