After taking this class I feel like I have a better understand of my personality and the different things that have influenced who I am, whether it be genetic factors or environmental factors. I have never looked so closely at my own personality and how different aspects of it make me who I am. For this final, I will be describing my personality through different characteristics that we have learned throughout the quarter in PSY 370.
First I am going to start with the genetic factor. As we learned in class, there is an association between D4DR gene and the personality trait that involves novelty seeking. Those who have long repeated version of D4DR gene are higher on novelty seeking and I think that goes for my personality. Although I do not think that I am on the far end of the spectrum, I think that I lean towards the side of novelty seeking. The need for stimulation through exploratory activities is something that I lean towards. Sensation seeking is another factor, which is the tendency to seek out thrilling and exciting activities. If I could skydive every weekend I would. Although, I feel as though I tend to be more introverted. Introverts have higher levels of ARAS so they tend to decrease and avoid stimulation, which I think contradicts the idea that I am a sensation seeker.
Another topic we discussed in class was the big 5 personality traits which are openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism. I think that I fall towards the middle in openness. I am very open to activities and thrilling adventures but I also am very set in my ways and don’t often like change. I think that I am very high on conscientiousness. I am reliable, hardworking, punctual and ambitious. I often think of others and I am a very organized person. I like things to be in order and know what to expect. I think that I am towards the middle for extraversion. I enjoy being social but I don’t necessarily thrive off of it. I am active, affectionate and talkative when I want to be but I also tend to be pessimistic. For agreeableness, I think I am pretty high on this trait. I am empathetic, softhearted and compassionate. The main thing that I would not consider myself agreeable is that I don’t necessarily
3. Given that Mike and Marty Scanlon are twins and share some of their genetic makeup, how
Over the last 100 years, the underpinning concepts in the fields of psychology and counseling were wrought. Within this period, these concepts have transformed and evolved from somewhat crude conceptions of the psyche toward more holistic interventions and approaches. As the profession continues to move forward, adaptations of the original theorists regarding the nature of man and the development of personality continue to emerge. These adaptations, along with the integration of new concepts and ideas, continue to contribute to the field. The author describes his view of man and human nature, personality development, and explores potential implications for counseling.
No two people are alike, and no two personalities are alike. A personality is made up of different characteristics, which help to define a person. Per the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator everyone has a four-letter personality type with 16 different personality combinations. These personality types affect everyone’s personal, social and work life. My four-letter personality type is ISFJ (introvert, sensing, feeling and judgment).
Psychoanalytical theory approach would not view human motivation as Maslow. The psychoanalytic theory place human motivation as an individual’s sexuality and aggression (McAdams, 2006). In psychoanalysis the person talks about they are experiencing with a therapist who
The tests related with personality intrigue people because human personality is a very curious topic for people. Everyone wants to know about their personality and the internet has become the easiest method to access any personality test that claims to solve your queries about your own. People take interest into these tests and end up being fooled by some vague claims made by a machine that has all remarks and conclusions fitted in it. I was no exception to it when I decided to take a personality test and get included in the list of those people who got duped by such tests.
Considering my personality, based on the “Big 5” personality traits, extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, and openness to experience, I scored on the high end of the moderate range. As for the openness to experience, I scored a 9 out of 10 ranging in the high level of personality factor (Project 2, BMAL-500 D, McGraw Hill Connect, Liberty University, 2017). I feel as if though this is accurate as I am generally outgoing and enjoy the company of others.
Feist, J., & Feist, G. J. (2009). Theories of Personality (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
However with advantages come disadvantages. For example, with correlational studies there is no background information obtained. Therefore, the reliability of the correlational studies is questioned.
The first subset of my personality is Extraversion, as opposed to Introversion. As an extrovert, I would describe myself as social, external and gregarious. This characteristic helps me communicate and reach out to others. However, there are cons that go along
The purpose of this paper is to discuss characteristics of my personality. The main focus of this paper will be how my personality has developed over time. As I age and encounter new and different experiences, my personality has adapted and developed further. This paper will give an in-depth exploration into the people and events that have influenced my personality.
A modified version of the Big 5 Personality Test was taken to assess my weaknesses and aptitudes for leadership. The test was designed to analyze 45 aspects of personality, such as listening skills, emotional stability, communication skills, critical thinking, motivation to lead, and conflict management styles. My answers suggest I have significant room for improvement in the areas of assertiveness and consideration for others. Conversely, my test results suggest I have significant strengths in the areas of emotional stability and critical thinking. The assessment appeared to adequately reflect my personality based on my own self-perception. Lessons learned from both the assessment and course material were integrated, which facilitated deeper critical thinking in the subjects of organizational behavior and leadership skill development. Finally, the subject of organizational behavior was discussed as it pertains to biblical teachings.
According to my IPIP-NEO narrative report I am a very independent, outgoing, calm, and curious person. My comprehensive report shows that I am: high scoring in openness, conscientiousness, and extraversion, average scoring in agreeableness and low scoring in Neuroticism. Raking in the 82nd percentile, extraversion was my second highest scoring trait. This means I am pretty outgoing, extraverted and love people. This is evident my scores of 89 in friendliness, 84 in assertiveness and 75 in activity level. Despite my high score in extraversion, I am on the lower side of average in the excitement-seeking facet with a score or 33. This means that even though I might like a little hustle and bustle and take charge I wont take to many risks and don’t always need a thrill to be satisfied.
The following will reflect this researchers understanding and reflection on personality, how it defines one, what it means, and if one’s personality changes to fit certain situations. At the end this researcher may have a better insight into herself as well as the personalities of others. This insight can help her in her future endeavors.
I have to admit that I was skeptical in completing the personality profile. I thought, “How could a few questions determine everything about my management style”. When I received my results, I was astonished at how accurately those results portrayed my personality. While deciding which of my personality traits were advantageous and which were detrimental to my management style, I became conflicted as all of my scores can be portrayed as both positive and negative depending on the situation.
What is a personality? A personality is a reflection of a person identity of a human being but we don’t share the same type of personality. There are so many different type of personality in the world some people have outgoing, shy, crazy, and settle personality. There are some people where there culture and surrounding shape their personality traits. In my culture and surrounding it has help me shape my personality in many ways.