Personality Types: Miranda And Adrene

Compared to my own personality, these personalities are very different, mainly because all three of them are extroverted. This could potentially create a problem if these group members are extroverted to such an extent that I become intimidated, since I am the opposite. Other problems that might arise in this group could be conflict between those who are assertive and those who are turbulent, or between those who are highly organized and those who are less

My group consisted of me my, my friend, and my roommate. We were able to balance personalities fairly well. This may be due to the fact of having arguments about various topics before. My roommate would be a communicator facilitator. He has been homeless in his lifetime this caused him to be sympathetic to students with personality and social issues. My friend would be a collaborative inventor. He understood the big picture of choosing the students with the absolute best chance of being successful at this school. He also did a lot of listening before actually speaking. My analytical

Collaboration is often first learn with friends (e.g. a sandbox), within the classroom (e.g. team projects). Emily Eldrige also goes on to share her life story, and her tendency not wanting to work in groups. Collaboration, by society standards, is seen as a natural skill, that everyone possess. When student prefer not to work in group, rather than promoting team effort, it is best to ask the students, why are groups not an interest or a likeness. Collaboration falls into three categories: life experiences, personality, and contextual knowledge. Personality is the predominant factor for most students. During this phase in a person's life, he/she is making numerous personal decisions that he/she will carry for the rest of his/her life. When

“Group members are classified into the following social styles: Analytical, Driver, Expressive, and Amiable.” (Griffith & Dunham, 2015). Analytical is someone who is picky about how things are done. They always want to be right no matter what. The driver is someone who is determined to embrace new things, one who is tough, and dominated. Expressive is someone who is enthusiastic and reacts to different behaviors. Amiable is the one who is cooperative, dependable, and supportive in a friendly manner. “When people gather in a group it can be a good or a bad experience. There are many personalities that can be in a group such as family, school, or workplace.”(Griffith & Dunham, 2015). Working in groups with different ideas, mindsets, cultures

There are four different types of personalities in my group: ESTJ, who is efficient, outgoing, analytical, systematic, and dependable. INFJ, who is Idealistic, organized, insightful, dependable, compassionate, and gentle. Also, an INTJ who is Innovative, independent, strategic, logical, reserved, and insightful. Then finally, ISTJ who is

After completing the Team Roles Test and reviewing the Belbin website, the team roles that describes my personality the most is the ‘’Plant’’ and the ‘’Executive.’’ In comparison to that, in my opinion, it is important to always be open to my group members, values, concerns and goals to resolve problems. As a team member, I am highly eager to both generate and listen to everyone’s ideas. Once my group and I have listened to each others’ input, I am quick to turn into suggestions into action. When involved in a group, I contribute to staying organized, creating practical plans and being reliable. Although I like to quickly meet objectives, I tend to focus on details and remain efficient.

One particular element I read when reading about the results of this indicator test was the ESFJ personality types works hard, see problems clearly and expects others to do the same. In nursing not everyone has the same personality and it is difficult for me when other nurses don’t have the same enthusiasm or flare to get tasks done. Also my personality demands structure and organization, not all personalities feel the same way. To improve my team performance, I need to remind myself to be respectful to other personalities, by not getting frustrated with others not performing the way I do. They just have different personalities.

My personality type according to the KTS-II assessment is Artisan. As an Artisan, I seek constant change, adventure and enjoy taking risks (Kiersey, 2015). The assessment aligns with an extroverted personality. An extroverted person is outgoing and talkative, often enjoys being the center of attention. An extraverted leadership skill is to focus one’s dominant characteristics on empowering and motivating the team rather them oneself. An extraverted leader is more likely to express charisma, provide intellectual stimulation and individual consideration to their coworkers (Grant, Gino, & Hofmann, 2011). Being free willed and seeking risk can conflict with opposite personality types, such as those who seek safety and certainty. Understanding

The partner I have chosen to work with is Rachel David. Her personality type is INFJ, which stands for Introverted, iNtuitive, Feeling, and Judging. I believe that my partner’s summary is weirdly accurate to a tee. Within Rachel’s personality results, it becomes known that INFJ’s are overachievers who put an unnecessary amount of responsibility on themselves. Rachel is most certainly a “doer” who takes on such a disproportionate amount of responsibility that she causes a great deal of unnecessary stress and agitation within her life. She is one of the most driven and hard-working people that I know and because of her drive and ambition to accomplish great goals within her life, her actions and personality may cause people to mistakenly describe

When managing my project teams, I often encounter many different personality types. The personality types usually do not align with mine, so I have trouble being a patient manager when it comes to some personality traits.

This essay aims to analyse how personality can affect the performance of teams. This essay will also explore various theories relevant to personalities and will assess how different personalities can be beneficial in increasing team performance as well as any disadvantages. This essay will also explore how personality can affect the inter-personal relationship between team members.

Within my group the ability to collaborate with each other was great; something that neither of us expected. However, even though we could work together that does not mean we did not encounter any challenges. The challenges we encountered was the ability to arrange a time where we could all work together due to the busy schedules we have. Although it took us a while to figure out what time worked out for all of us, the problem was eventually solved to where it was beneficial for all group members.

Having an ISTJ personality can be both good and bad when working on group projects. Seeing as this type of person doesn’t like to share too much, a lot of information that they might come

The ideal team should consist of a mixture of individuals who have different behavioral styles. In addition to the mixture, managers should also take the

Our team is made up of people from different parts of the United States. Like the United States, different persons, or different parts of the country, have diverse attitudes and values. Also, we naturally have different emotions and personalities. For all of our differences, like the United States, we can strive to achieve and excel through collaboration, compromise, and adopting a team first attitude. In terms of increasing the motivation, satisfaction, and performance of the team, the makeup of behavior styles seems like they were naturally designed to motivate each other through strengthening each other’s weaknesses. Each member brings a distinctive personality with a variety of experiences that could be very different from the