Personality and Emotions Exam

Feist, J., & Feist, G. J. (2009). Theories of Personality (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

A very useful model to assess a person personality and behavior pattern is through the use of the big five test. This test allows an administrator to get an accurate and quick assessment of the patients personality. The big five model is a widely used, modern, validated and replicated methodology for evaluating, understanding, and measuring one’s personality (McAdams, 1992). This test is highly associated with those suffering from obsessive compulsive disorder. And through this test those suffering from OCD will reveal their openness, agreeableness,

In taking the Big Five Personality Test, I find the results to be consistent with my personality. According to the results, I am a conventional and down to earth person that is very well-organized and can be relied upon. Furthermore, I am a nervous and quiet person with the tendency to be mean and rude to others. These findings are pretty accurate because I know for a fact that I am a very well-organized person with no intention of being center of attention in a room full of people. Furthermore, my friends are always telling me that I am rude and harsh on certain things. Finally, I prefer to see things realistically rather than using my imagination and being creative.

According to the Emotional Assessment/ Personality Test, my greatest personality strength was good reliability. I would have to say that being reliable is one of my greatest strengths. When I say I will do something, it will get done. I like being held accountable for my actions, and never like letting someone down. Therefore, I am very reliable. Being a reliable person in the workforce, or in life has perks. When someone is a reliable person, it lets others know that they can count on you to get things done. In the workforce, being such a reliable person can eventually lead to promotions. I work at a daycare/ Pre-K school, and we always have teachers to call out. The directors always call me, because they know they can rely on me to be there. The directors have sat me down in their office to discuss making me a director as well; therefore, being a reliable person can most definitely have its perks. Being a reliable person that someone can always count, is

Using the theories of personality discussed in the chapter, identify at least three dimensions of Mark Wilson's personality?

My results for the MBTI personality test was ISTP. Which represents me as introversion, sensing, thinking, and perceiving. I have personally never taken this test but I believe I got put into the right category. I was slightly introverted which wasn’t too much of a surprise for me because I am pretty shy sometimes. I love hanging out with people and never pass up an opportunity for a good time, so I would say I am more towards the middle between extroversion and introversion. For example, I wouldn’t go up and talk to someone out of the blue, but if anyone ever asked me to go meet people or do something I would usually say yes. The result for the way I make decisions seem very accurate to me. I usually always think logically and would think

On the emotional intelligence quiz, I received a 70 out of 100. I learned that in most situations, I’m the calm one, who is usually trying to talk sense into someone else. For example the question about the angry customer on the phone, I choose the answer about talk to him, and offering him options that could help with his problem. I learned that I’m a problem solver, which I would have never have pictured myself as being. I think of myself more as a listener, than a problem solver. It does make sense though since being a problem solver and listener do go together. You have to listen to someone to help them solve their problems. I know that people will come to me, if they have problems with anything. So I’m a lot more savvy than I thought I

This study is about experimental testing to determine the possibility of being able to condition an emotional response. To conduct this experiment the authors, ( J.B. Watson and R. Rayner), used an infant as their test subject. This infant met ideal criteria and emotional stability, which was one of the main reasons this particular infant, Albert B., was used in the experimental testing. Following ethical standards, the authors felt that they could do him little harm by performing the experimental tests. The authors support the idea that in infancy, emotional reaction patterns are small in number. These emotional reaction patterns include fear, rage and love (also referred to as sex). These patterns are tested on the infant in this experiment.

The main points of my results were for my personality assessment was extravert, intuitive, feeler, and perceiver. The results from the Focus 2 section for the first and fourth category, work and leisure interests were social, artistic, enterprising, and educational. The second category, skill interest, results were listening, performing arts, and social perceptiveness. The third category, value assessment, the outcomes were creativity, independence, and stability. The final category, personality, was similar to the personality assessment except it gave more detailed explanations about my assessment. Some of the possible career chooses available as degrees at UNLV were therapist, economist, casting director, standards engineer, and youth services

The first personality test I completed was the similar minds 16 factor personality test. The results of the test broke down my personality into 16 different factors to include, warmth, intellect, liveliness, dutifulness, sensitivity, anxiety, perfectionism and many more. The results of the test show how you measure on a scale of 0% to 100% for each of the 16 factors. It then tells you what a low score and a high score generally represents for each factor. A low score in warmth is presented by the adjectives cold and selfish. A high score in warmth is presented by adjectives such as supportive and comforting. Each of the 16 factors are presented in this way.

There any many different people that are on teams and organization. Knowing the different types of personality using the Myers Briggs and the Emotional Intelligence assessments can help you understand their Agile. My personality type is ENFJ and I have good EQ high Emotional Intelligence. I will discuss how my personality could be right for some agile projects.

The personality assessment inventory tests provide results on my individual personality, values, motivation, decision making, communication, team skills, conflict skills, organizational structure preference, and stress. These results are broken down briefly in three parts and do not include any personal speculation or analysis as to their meaning. The application of these results are further applied and explains how the results noted from the tests and in the first step will make me a better employee, co-worker, and manager within my organization. These tests mentioned above are applied in conjunction with particular examples on how I can achieve becoming a better employee, co-worker, and manager. An explanation of how my personality and experiences were affected by the Holy Spirit is also discussed. Particularly, how potential weaknesses have become strengths with the guidance of the Lord.

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator has four categories for the survey of above listed people personality, which are,

Page 2 different categories based on your answers. The four quadrants are self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, and relationship management. My scores for the Emotional Intelligence Test were as follows;

Anal stage: The anal-retentive personality type delays final satisfactions to the last possible moment and shows orderliness, stinginess, and stubbornness, a