Essay about Persuasion in "12 Angry Men"

Similarly ,In Twelve Angry Men Juror 8 is a smart and moral juror who is willing to stand against all the other jurors for what he thinks is right. He is the main protagonist who believes a boy accused with murdering his father deserves a discussion prior to a guilty verdict. Although all the other jurors initially voted guilty, juror 8 believed that the jurors should not “send a boy off to die without talking about it first”(Juror 8, 12). Throughout the play Juror 8 combats the pressure from the other Jurors to just vote guilty and manages to convince his fellow Jurors one by one that there in fact is “reasonable doubt”(Judge, 6) and convinces them to arrive at a “not guilty”(Juror 3, 72) verdict. Reginald Rose extols Juror 8’s pursuit of justice through his success. Not only did Juror 8 stand by his principles and have the courage to stand against all the other Jurors, he also had the wits to convince his fellow jurors to change their verdict. Through these actions Juror 8 brings justice to the courts of New York city saving the life of a young boy.

Throughout the play, juror three interrupts others in mid-sentence and attacks their opinions hoping to quash them quickly before they pollute his own flawless opinion and doubt has a chance to creep into the dark crevices of his mind. For instance, when juror eight surprises the group with a second knife, juror three is already angry, too angry. His voice rises and shakes with an animal-like ferocity. "You pulled a real bright trick here. Now supposing you tell us what you proved here. Maybe there are ten knives like that one. So what?" Not thinking that this put a dent in his case, juror eights brains have overcome the emotions of juror three.

When watching the move 12 Angry Men, we see different views from the jurors such as social influence, majority influence, specific motivation and egoism. This shows different attitudes and opinions the jurors have. One man out of twelve jurors decides to take on a room of eleven stubborn jurors as given the verdict of not guilty. The eleven jurors elected for the kid to be guilty and refused to think otherwise until the one non guilty juror decided to step up and discuss the situation. The majority of the jurors seem very impatient and anxious to get out of the courtroom. They believe the one juror who is patient and wanting to discuss the situation is just wasting their time. The jurors shows many characteristics throughout the movie

“As we explore persuasion, we can divide the persuasive communication into three parts: the communicator, the message, and the audience. First, we will deal with what characteristics of persuaders make people more likely to be persuaded. Next, we will think about characteristics of the message that lead people to change. Finally, we will explore what characteristics of the audience can lead them to be persuaded.” (Feenstra, 2011, p. 88) For your assignment this week, provide an in-depth analysis of the three parts of persuasion. Please reference the bullet points below to complete your assignment.

Many people all over the world are using various techniques to convince people during arguments. The most popular ones are ethos, pathos, and logos. Depending on the statement that the reader is trying to send out to the audience, he/she uses a specific persuasive argument. Reliable and convincing arguments contrast one another since reliable arguments are based on the credibility of the speaker whereas convincing arguments are based on proven facts. The credibility of the speaker helps the reliability of the arguments, and this makes the people believe that what the speaker is saying must be true.

One of the key factors in crafting a persuasive piece of rhetoric is tailoring your message to the specific audience. This information will help you decide what sorts of facts to incorporate into your rhetoric as well as help you determine which means of persuasion would be the most effective to employ. Your evidence. When planning your speech or writing, collect any and every type of evidence you can find. Evidence could be facts, statistics, laws, and individual testimonies. It’s always good to have a nice blend, but remember different audiences are persuaded by different types of evidence. Some people need cold, hard facts and statistics in order to be persuaded. Others find the testimony of peers or a reputable authority to be more convincing. Part of getting to know your audience is figuring out what kinds of evidence they will find most credible and compelling

Gerard A. Hauser covers a plethora of details on how to create a well-made persuasive argument in his book, an Introduction to Rhetorical Theory; however, he covered three specific essentials that are necessary for persuasion: the components logos, pathos and ethos; purposive discourse and rhetorical competence; identification. I will argue for each constituent, respectively, to prove that persuasion cannot thrive without the aforementioned essentials.

We as people understand the bare minimum of persuasion, but we generally do not know the different types or ways of persuasion or the science and research behind why we are persuaded by different things. I will be able to use what I have learned from this course in my academic and professional endeavors. I find the suggestions, tips, and practice of public speaking/presenting to be invaluable to anyone. I will surely use what I learned from that and practice it in hopes to become a better public speaker. In addition to public speaking, I will be able to use the tools of persuasion. Not everyone can be persuaded the same way and not all information can be presented the same way in attempts to persuade an audience. We are taught these tools that help layout the different ways to persuade someone(s). So, Communication 2367 has taught me how complex persuasion is and given me invaluable tools to excel in any future

To be able to persuade someone comes in many benefits since it shows the audience the other perspective they can be looking at. Talking about perspectives, these articles/speeches are all primary sources which expresses the emotional feelings that are being told. Using specific techniques that are made over years cause the writer to be flexible to their own audience, so that they can persuade the one who’s reading or hearing. Using 2 types of ways that could’ve or that did happened makes the writer find way to emotionally catch one’s attention with reason or logic. Which then leads to descriptive writing about the Apollo 11 launch being a persuasive text for the imagery it gives for the viewers. Visual Images can be a great way to point out obvious instead of writing paragraph, such as text 4 that talks about the truth that happened between societies.

The Central Route to persuasion occurs when the focus is on the argument or evidence and people response with positive thoughts and/or feedback. This route is motivating when people care about an issue and want to talk about it. An example would be Global warming. People use scientific

Another characteristics that will be addressed is audience and role gender and self-esteem, culture involved in the process of receiving persuasive messages. Persuasion presented in minute different unique ways and forms that will convince people in many ways to agree on things they are really unsure and uncomfortable doing. One must show the ability of important type of characteristics. There are multiple characteristics most important two characteristics are credibility and expertise that allows trustworthiness of the persuader, or central communicator. Credibility is defined as, Believability; a factor in whether a message is persuasive. Credibility has two aspects expertise and trustworthiness. All thought credible play a huge part of persuasion,

The first concept that is important to persuasion is being situation sensitive. It is important to understand that every situation is different. Even if the situation has a similar context the people and they way it is perceived is different and therefore requires its own form of persuasion. There are three factors that take a part in being situationally sensitive. The first factor the book discusses is people's level of commitment and their relationship. These things will play a role in how the message is perceived. “It is one thing to disagree with a strangers on a train to disagree about whether abortion is murder; it is quite another for a husband and his pregnant wife to have the same disagreement” (simons and Jones 126). This quote

Did the persuader write down their argument on an online blog where they can be rebutted from anyone that reads the article or did they approach you in segregated location? The more publicly or permanently accessible the persuasion is then the more it appeals to the Commitment and Consistency.

Informative presentation are more applicable for training and education, while persuasive is relevant for selling a product, service, or contributing to a cause. There are also similarities between the two concepts such as having a clear goal to ensure the understanding and remembrance for the audience, customizing appropriately according to the audience need, as well as engaging the audience with Q&A and other interactive approaches. The author listed the different aspects that relate to these two categories of speech such as problem-solution, benefits, emotions, and trust. Overall, persuasion is more practical to attain these specific aims. For example, the audience is more likely to act when the speaker provides a solution as well as provides the benefits that the audience will gain from buying, contributing, or approving. Similarly, in an informative presentation, the speaker is not completely required to tapping into the audience emotion nor establishing trust. Lastly, an action step is different for each goal, for a persuasive style, the speaker will call to action at the end of the speech, and informative presentation will suggest that people will put what they have learned into

What is it to be convincing? At first, this appears as a simple question, right?