Persuasive Essay About Eating Locally

Healthy food should be accessible to everyone. If healthy food isn’t available for everyone all it’s going to do is cause more and more health problems. If we made healthy organic food the same price as cheap unhealthy food there would be a big difference in the health of our country. It’s completely unfair to make healthy food too expensive for other people to buy, which causes them to buy cheap unhealthy food, like off a dollar menu at a fast food restaurant. This issue needs to be put to an end.

Pound by pound, inch by inch, it slowly adds up until one day you wake up and realize you need to make a change. You try one diet after the other, lose a little of the extra weight, plateau, and begin watching the numbers climb right back to where they were before and then keep going. All that hard work wasted. It can leave you feeling defeated, frustrated, and completely alone. If this sounds familiar, you are not alone.

Eating local is a simple change, but can make a difference in a few aspects. Food is able to stay on the vine longer and grow more nutrients for your body and money you spend locally will recycle through your community. Locavorism is becoming more popular and farmers’ markets a high demand since more people are discovering the benefits of it. Overall, it proves to be better for everyone when you buy and eat locally grown food.

Having fresh fruits and vegetables locally would be nice, to have refreshing, raw, unprocessed food instead of food that’s been sitting in the store for weeks. That’s what locavores are all about. But unfortunately, thats not reality. And the chances of everyone going out of there way to find these locally grown foods, is utterly ridiculous.

By eating more foods from community based farms, will reduce pollution and improve the air quality (A) resulting from semi-trucks delivering fewer shipments. Having less polluted air will tremendously improve the environment by reducing the greenhouse gases that are emitted. Although those who oppose this change, claim that consuming home-grown products still can utilize the same amount of fuel (C). For example, a local farmer who sells fifty apples at a stall fifty miles from his farm uses the same “amount of fuel per apple” as a foreign company shipping two-thousand apples over two-thousand miles to a store (C). While this debate is compelling, in the long run, purchasing and consuming regionally-produced foods will have a greater impact in reducing pollution rather than solely buying imported foods. This is because companies will not have to import the same amount of food as often, if everyone joins the campaign by eating locally. Therefore, by switching to this lifestyle, the environment will notably

Buying locally reduces transportation, therefore less carbon emission is released into the air. Does this not mean that locavorism could save the planet? Well it actually may not according to James McWilliams, a writer on Forbes.com. McWilliams says, “factors other than shipping far outweigh the energy it takes to transport food...transportation accounts for only 11% of food’s carbon footprint.” McWilliams regards things such as water usage, fertilizer types, processing methods and packaging techniques to prove that buying fresher foods is not always the right idea. Farms and companies that are said to be ‘green’ and ‘better for the planet’ could actually be harming the planet much more than they thought.

More than 44 million people in 2009 were identified as living in food insecurity, the USDA’s current term for going hungry (Imhoff 17). The government, nonprofits and other organizations have been drafting potential solutions for a while to solve world hunger, but the number of food insecure people is still exceptionally high and on the rise. The complete abolishment of it is presumably unattainable, but reducing it to a much smaller amount is certainly possible and a necessity. All American citizens are targets. One economic depression or catastrophic mishap may leave you in food insecurity and desperate need for help. So don't you wish our country has a well-functioning system able to support us all? The US’s main answer to food insecurity is the Farm Bill. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Programs(SNAP) is the major program contained in the bill. From 2008-2010, 72.3% of the farm bill and 53.1 billion dollars was dedicated to SNAP, and current enrollment in it is at the highest (Imhoff 52). Is SNAP the best solution to widespread hunger? Should the United States dedicate so much money in effort to it? “The current SNAP program is so deeply flawed, the United States should draft another “food stamp” policy and remove it from the Food Bill.

According to an analysis by Rich Pirog of the Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture, “transportation accounts for only 11% of food’s carbon footprint.” Forbes also notes that it “is not food miles but apples per gallon,” implying that transportation is not the primary cause of greenhouse gasses (C). A chart excerpted from an environmental magazine visualizes the total greenhouse gas emission from factory products, measuring the climate impact in metric tons of CO2 per household-year due to transportation, production, and wholesale. Of all products, production showed to be most harmful towards the environment, releasing over five times more emission than that of transportation and wholesale/retail. Some might again argue that the problem is not the “where” or “how,” but “what is being made.” Referring back to the graph, red meat proves to emit much more greenhouse gas than any other product (D). Another solution can be to cut down on red meat or become a hearty vegan. Locavores strongly believe in buying local produce to decrease pollution; one way or another, distance is the least of our problems — it is all about how the products are

Dining out at local restaurants is just irresistible for most of us. Well it's the easiest way to fill an empty stomach and get relief from the trouble of cooking and cleaning dishes. Moreover nothing is better than an outing with a good meal and conversation shared with loved ones. Unfortunately; eating out can be a strain to a monthly budget leaving you with a little lighter purse. But now without any hurdles in next meal out; one can still save heavy bucks on a restaurant bill. Without giving up idea of quality food; one can enjoy at restaurants and slash down those bills at the same time. For that you need to catch up with some money saving tips and ideas to save money at eateries without starving your wallet:

If you're like me, you probably have good intentions about eating healthier, but eating healthy can be expensive! If you want to save money on your groceries and still eat cheap, healthy meals this week, I just spent several hours looking up recipes, shopping for the best ingredients to use cheaply and figuring out how to do weekly healthy meal prep. I'm going to share that plan with you here. You'll get a shopping list and links to recipes along with other tips to help you save money this week.

Locavores are people who have decided to eat locally grown or produced products. The more people discuss locavores, the more support local farms get from surrounding communities. Placing the local farms closer in proximity with one another will minimize the amount of pollution in the air due to harmful chemicals secreted through transportation. Produce from local farms contain less contamination from chemicals that try to kill pesticides. Local farms have organic certifications refurbishments, which are requirements that have to be met in order to sell organic produce, such as using the correct materials approved by the USDA and knowing what materials are not approved. From these positive initiatives conducted to help improve one’s health and

Author Michael Pollan points out in the film that “to eat well in this country costs more than to eat badly. It will take more money and some people simply don’t have it. And that’s one of the reasons that we need changes at the policy level so that the carrots are a better deal than the chips.” If healthful, environmentally sustainable food were to cost less than other food, do you think people would eat more of it? Why do you think

Everybody sees it everywhere. “Lose 60 pounds in 6 weeks!” “Skinny is what’s in!” “Detox diet plan!” It’s a fair assumption to assume that the world, especially the United States, is obsessed with being healthy. From celebrity workout programs to expensive diet systems that make people lose weight, being fit is always what’s mainly focused on in the media, daily life, and nationwide. But with obsessions, come unhealthy actions and interests. Most people that anyone knows is most likely upset with some aspect of themselves. Whether it be the way they look, how they eat, or their lifestyle, obsession happens because of the nearly-impossible body types and lifestyles found on social media. On top of this, there are also restrictions and challenges that come with eating a healthy diet that seem simply irradical to address, and unhealthier foods are more available than ever. With these slowly arising issues, anyone would think the nation is making it hard for themselves to be healthy. The society the nation lives in is making it progressively harder and harder to be healthy because of the lifestyles that are easier to achieve.

The quote “A man can live and be healthy without killing animals for food; therefore, if he eats meat, he participates in taking animal life merely for the sake of his appetite. And to act so is immoral” from Russian writer, Leo Tolstoy, encompasses what vegetarianism is about. Veganism and vegetarianism is generally associated with leafy green salads but there is a long list of health benefits attached to that way of eating and a reduction in livestock farming benefits our environment. Diving into the benefits of becoming a vegetarian or vegan, there has been extensive research done on how a teak in diet can reduce risk of cancer, diabetes and heart disease. Plant-based dieting is a lifestyle that is beneficial for health, moral and environmental reasons.

When something is detrimental to our health, we strive to avoid it whenever possible to extend our lives. We know that exposure to known cancer causing agents such as asbestos and lead paint is harmful; therefore, we do not expose ourselves to the risk and we certainly do not eat it. This seems simple; however, what do we do when that harmful vice is food? We cannot stop eating; instead, we must closely examine what we are putting into our bodies. When faced with the choice of a burger or grilled vegetables, most would choose the burger. These choices have lead us down a path littered with food related diseases, illnesses and rising healthcare costs. The state of Americans health is declining due to increasing obesity, diabetes and