Persuasive Essay Against Animal Testing

Approximately 26 million animals are used every year in the United States alone for research and commercial testing (“Background of the Issue” 1). For years, legislators have debated the pros and cons of animal testing, and laws were passed to attempt to fix the inhumane treatment of the cute, innocent testing subjects, the animals. Although the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) was revised numerous times, “the species most commonly used in experiments (mice, rats, birds, fish, reptiles, and amphibians) comprise 99% of all animals in laboratories” and are the animals that are specifically exempted from protection under the act (“Experiments on Animals” 2). A simple fix to animal cruelty during testing is to use alternative methods since human and animal bodies already vary greatly. For years, animal testing was the best option because there was no alternative to testing on a living, whole-body system; however, in the age of technology, there is no reason for millions of animals to be killed due to the severity of the testing. Therefore, animal testing should be banned because alternative methods provide more accurate results since human bodies are very different than animal bodies; furthermore, animal advocacy organizations should promote cruelty-free products more so customers know what to purchase and use.

Just in the United States, “there are about 26 million different species, from dogs to birds, being used every year for medical and science related testing” (“Animals in Science / Research”). Throughout the process of testing, “monkeys are addicted to drugs, cats are deafened and have holes drilled into their skulls, sheep and pigs have their skin burned off, and rats have their spinal cords crushed” (“Animals in Medical Experiments”). As a result, animals face cruel conditions and have no way of fighting back. Although medical testings on animals may cure the deadliest diseases such as cancer and tuberculosis, the abuse and mistreatment these animals face while testing medicines should be deemed inhumane, and such practices should be banned in the United States.

Animal Testing also known as Animal Experimentation is the use of non-human animals as test subjects in a variety of experiments aimed to acquire more knowledge about human diseases. Even thought rats seem very distant from us humans they share a lot of similar genetic and psychological features that can help us propel into higher level of understanding and save human lives.

Abraham Lincoln once said, “I am in favour of animal rights as well as human rights. That is the way of a whole human being.” I couldn’t agree more with this statement as I do not believe that animal testing is right and I am totally against it.

Animal testing has been going on since the time of the Ancient Greeks. These experiments still continue to occur even today, these poor defenseless animals are injected and exposed to painfully deadly diseases so that science can observe the symptoms, and the progression. It has been shown that animal testing does not provide adequate information on how they will affect a human. “Laboratory animals do not have anything like the same biology as humans. Yet although animal toxicity tests have never been scientifically validated to determine whether they can effectively predict toxicity for humans, a mind-boggling array of animal-based data now fill toxicology manuals, textbooks, and computer databases”(Fano 24). Animal testing is simply laziness, and is

Each year, 100 million animals die from testing in laboratories, biology lessons, and experimentation in the United States alone. Animal testing started in first century Greece where a doctor named Galen studied animals. Subsequently, a scientist 400 years ago named William Harvey used animals to understand the human body. However, modern day animal testing did not start until 150 years ago when physiology became a popular science. Animal testing is inhumane, cruel, and grotesque. It is a major problem and controversial issue in the United States. Foremost, it should be put to an end because it is wrong, has multiple better alternatives, and it should not be considered a valid testing method.

Glad wrap, Colgate, Listerine, Mars bars, M&Ms, Skittles, and Kleenex tissues. You may not know it, but over 100 million animals are being tested for products like these, every year for our benefit. However, in the technological society that we live in today, we are exposed to many alternatives, and yet, animals are still the main source of laboratory studies. How did this all start? Which animals are bearing the brunt, for us?

Did you know that animals are being testing on, and none of the tests actually benefit humans? Animals should not be used to test medicines and other chemicals before humans use them. Albert Einstein once said “Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty,” and he was correct. Many people believe that animal testing helps the human race. Information has proven that animals should not be tested on because it has no beneficial impact on curing human diseases by testing medicines and many more reasons.It is a waste of time and it is pain to the animals. The results of the testing mainly show negative results which doesn’t help humans.

Animals and humans are biologically different from each other, so results from animal experiments can’t be applied accurately to humans. Other than cosmetic companies needing insurance for their products, scientists and research use animal experimentation to collect data to use for medicine and vaccine purposes as well. With the inability to conduct reliable and plausible data, animal testing is useless. According to Christine Stevens, “Misleading results from experiments and tests using the “wrong” animals [biological differences are incapable to be compared to human anatomy due to inaccuracy] mean that the hundreds of thousands of death were worse than useless. They have cluttered the scientific literature with false conclusions virtually

People should NOT do Human Experimentation because, you're risking so many people's lives by testing on humans.There is so many different ways you could test the experiment. There is plants and animals are that you could perform the procedure on instead of doing it on humans. Manufacturers, hope that animal tests will give an indication of how a given drug will affect humans. Inventions have been expanding since the the past years and scientists ended up making a clone of a sheep. That means that they could possibly make a clone of a human. Scientists could make clones for doctors and they can do the experiment on the clones.

Since long before remembrance, society has used animals to test products and medicines that might be harmful to humans, but there is new technology such as chips, computer models, and microdosing that could replace animals. The animals take the pain (if any), so that humans don’t have to. However, animal testing is no longer needed, because scientists today have invented technology that cancels out the use of animal lives. For example, ‘Organ on Chips’, a chip equipped with human living cells. These are able to do any human function, and could also die of the test permits it to do so. Using actual human cells allows for a better and more accurate test than using animals whose cells are slightly altered from humans. Another alternative from

“Never be afraid to do what’s right, especially if the well-being of a person or ANIMAL is at stake.” - Martin Luther King Jr. The animal welfare act is to regulate the use and care of animals in a laboratory setting. Animal rights is the right believed to belong to animals to live free from use in medical research, hunting, and other services to humans. The first animal protection group was called ASPCA or the Animal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals founded by Henry Bergh in April 1866 (“11 facts about animal”). Animals shouldn’t be used in medical research because the animals aren’t protected by the Animal Welfare Act, and there are alternatives for testing products that don’t involve animals, despite the fact that some of these tests led to medical breakthroughs (“should animals be used”).

However, most of the commonly tested animals are not protected. “Labs that use mice, rats, birds, reptiles and amphibians are exempted from the minimal protections under the Animal Welfare Act (AWA)” (“11 Facts”). In addition, many individuals retort that they would prefer using animals because if not, we would have to test on humans. As argued on peta.org, “The fact is that we already do test new drugs on people. No matter how many tests on animals are undertaken, someone will always be the first human to be tested on” (“Animal”). Animals are just being tested on in addition to humans. Its commonly argued that every major medical advance is attributable to experiments on animals. On peta.org it explains why that's not true, “Most experiments on animals are not relevant to human health, they do not contribute meaningfully to medical advances, and many are undertaken simply out of curiosity and do not even pretend to hold promise for curing illnesses” (“Animal”).

We have found and saved many animals and killed many because of our incompetence but if we stop animal experimentation we will make the earth a better place to live.

It is estimated that around 20 million animals are used for testing yearly for the purpose of medicine and for other human products. One of the most common questions asked is why