Persuasive Essay Against Capital Punishment

Capital punishment is one of the most controversial topics in today’s world. Many people believe that it is morally wrong to have capital punishment as a sentence to a crime. People also do believe that it is morally permissible for a severe crime. Capital punishment is also known as the death penalty. It can be given as a sentence when somebody is convicted of an extremely violent crime. The biggest issue that can be seen with this is that somebody could be innocent and sentenced with the death penalty because of the nature of the crime that they have been accused of even if they didn’t commit it. I believe that there is a moral line between using the death penalty and using other forms of punishment.

In an effort to make sure that innocent men and women are not wrongly convicted in capital punishments cases, they are given a wide range of appeals procedures. Immediately following sentencing an automatic appeals process called Direct Review begins. It is during this process that appellate courts review the lower trial court’s decision, checking for errors and making sure the case was tried on sound judgment. If any errors are found

People on death row are not really dying. “In 2010, a death row inmate waited an average of 178 months (roughly 15 years) between sentencing and execution. Nearly a quarter of deaths on death row in the U.S. are due to natural causes.” (Wikipedia, 2015). We are paying tax dollars to have people sit in prison for up to 15 years, and to have three quarters of them executed. Should we even have capital punishment?

Perhaps we should give the judge a knife and tell her that if she has

Capital punishment is an issue that has long been debated amongst Americans. We have been questioning the morality of "an Eye For an Eye" way of thinking. Many say that serious crimes deserve serious punishments such as death, where others view death to be an unjust punishment for any crime. Each side seems to be equal in its volume of supporters. There are also many who ride the fence on the issue, unconvinced of either side. I, however, am writing to illustrate the immoral view of capital punishment. This document does not presume to have the right answer to the question, for to assume that would be arrogant. No, this essay is merely a tool to be used in weighing this very important issue.

Capital Punishment is a legal punishment where a lot of innocent people have been convicted and executed. It’s a punishment determining who lives and who dies, I believe Capital Punishment should no longer be an option. The death penalty puts innocent lives at risk, there are better alternatives and The Eighth Amendment prohibiting cruel or unusual punishment.

Capital punishment has been around since the colonial days (over 400 years) and while the humane side of it has improved greatly, heinous crimes still happen every single day. Answer me one question? If capital punishment is served as justice for a heinous crime, why do people still commit murder today? Wouldn’t preventing that heinous crime from occurring in the first place be better for the victims, the murderers, and better for America in general. Why do we continue to pursue justice instead of pursuing ways to prevent us from need to serve justice? Why do we pour resources into serving justice instead of pouring resources to prevent it? Would I rather see the person who killed my friend be put to death, or would I rather still see my friend? I think most of us would choose the latter without missing a beat. With that, I believe the death penalty is not working because of its excessively unresolved research of its true deterioration of crime, prohibitive cost of an imperfect system coupled with a complicated legal process, and probability risk of human error in putting an innocent person to death.

Capital punishment, or execution, or death penalty, or sentence to death has always been the best answer for criminals with unforgivable crimes such as murder or child-rape , almost 61% of Americans unanimously agree so, as reported by the Gallup Poll in August 1997. Gradually, however, the American’s opinions have been shifted. In September 2014, the Gallup Poll asked “Which do you think is the better penalty for murder - the death penalty or life imprisonment?” Nearly 45 percent of respondents answer life imprisonment. The societal shift occurs due to the exposure of the excess expense of capital cases, the acknowledgement of the inevitable judicial mistakes, and some other reasons. The writing below is determined to provide detailed reasons why capital punishment is no longer necessary, and why it is time for Americans to consider new and viable options such as life without parole.

While capital punishment may be unjust for criminals, it is also an injustice done to unsuspecting citizens. Taxpayers are stuck paying for this entire process, from a criminal’s first court case to their execution. This is especially bad for American citizens because even though it might not seem like it, the death penalty is more costly than life in prison. For example, in an article titled “Californians asked to end death penalty - to save money,” cases involving capital punishment are proven to cost more than ones that do not. This is partially due to the fact that there are few public defenders equipped to handle death penalty cases. It also has to do with the number of appeals to higher courts inmates are forced go through. Both of these contribute to a mess of petitions and appeals that can span a decade, sometimes more. These can get costly, especially when compared to life in prison. In the same article, it was estimated that cases involving capital punishment can cost taxpayers $3 million in lifetime costs. This is about $1.9 million more than any other court case. This is just one example of an unnecessary cost that could be avoided if prisoners were given life in prison without parole. Supporters of the death penalty will also argue that the cost of executing someone is cheaper than keeping them alive. While the drugs themselves may be cheap, the cost of keeping someone on death row is not. The specific costs are not tracked by state officials, but studies

Capital punishment is the legitimized killing of someone accused of a crime to serve as punishment. Crimes punishable by this method are known as capital crimes or offenses. Capital punishment is a hotly debated topic that has been around for many decades. In the U. S for instance, this painstaking debate has split the people right in the middle with the opposing camps not ready to loosen their strings whatsoever in favor of the other opinion. Capital punishment is an illegal act under the US Constitution as stipulated in the 8th Amendment. This has made the capital punishment issue the more complicated. By all standards, the definition is frightening and very scary. There have been many cases that have influenced the development of the death penalty in various states across the US and also around the world. The moral justification of capital punishment is one that has split the opinion of people right in the middle. Nonetheless, a risk-benefit analysis would reveal that the 8th Amendment is an unfair piece of legislation and this is because of various reasons.

The comfort provided to the families and friends of murder and rape victims is one benefit of capital punishment that should not be waved easily aside. How great a consolation it must be that a ruthless criminal can no longer damage the lives of others. As a result of the death penalty, a father and mother no longer have to worry that the same individual who murdered their son will do the same to their daughter. In addition, not only is worry eliminated, but the justice of capital punishment repairs – if only slightly – the injustice which has been done to those who have been murdered or raped, as well as their families. In Genesis, Moses – writing under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit – tells us that “whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed, for God made man in His own image.” (Genesis 9:6, ESV) God calls humanity “very good” in the creation account, because they are the sole bearers of His image on earth – He didn’t choose the rocks, the trees, or the lions to bear his image. Therefore, as the image bearers of God, isn’t only right that humanity exacts judgement on those who have defiled the image of God through murder and rape? Capital punishment is not only a comfort to those affected by tragedy, but also a just punishment upon those by whom the tragedy was caused.

Every country worldwide wants to eliminate all crimes in their society, but it is impossible to do so whether it takes harsh methods like capital punishment. Even Albert Camus, a French philosopher, once said, “For centuries the death penalty, often accompanied by barbarous refinements, has been trying to hold crime in check; yet crime persists” (“Death Penalty Sayings and Quotes”). Capital Punishment, also known as the death penalty, is the execution of an offender who is sentenced to death after being convicted of a crime by the court. In ancient Greece under Draco’s Law, capital punishment was widely employed for murder, treason, arson, and rape. It reflected upon the ancient principle of “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, a life for a life” which appeared in the Babylonian Code of Hammurabi (R. Hood). As centuries went by, methods of punishment for the death penalty have developed over time, catering its usage to fit the criminal system of the current society. Some forms of punishment existent today include electrocution, gassing, hanging, firing squad, and the most common, lethal injection. Although the death penalty has been used over several centuries, the issue had been raising a lot of controversy within many governments and their citizens who are currently debating whether it is the right decision for the criminal system. Capital punishment should be abolished worldwide as a form of punishment. Countries with the death penalty have been wrongfully executed

The death penalty is when someone like a criminal would do something so terribly bad that they are executed by lethal injection. The topic of this has been disputed for a lot of years and nobody has really agreed on if it is or is not effective. Study’s show that the argument is split a lot of people think it is bad and a lot of people think it is a bad thing most people don’t want there tax dollars to go to keeping inmates in prison and feeding them. But some people think that it is just too hard of a punishment to kill somebody instead of keeping them in prison.

I agree with the death penalty because it would be nice to have because it would be great for people who did bad things to people and they don’t get punished for what they did after we got rid of the death penalty. Now they just have a life sentence and they just slowly rot away and they could also get out on good behavior or testify against their life sentence in court and get out on good behavior with parole. They could go out of jail stay clean for a while then committee another crime then they should get the t death penalty or life sentence no parole so the they can't testify in the court of law. It would be nice to have it because if someone kills a person or multiple because they shouldn’t just be in jail getting bigger, stronger, etc. they should just keep getting closer to the chamber where they die and just have that on there conisin why did i kill that that person when they are getting closer to the camber. I also think they should not have the death penalty because if you didn’t do it you should be able to testify as much as they would like to testify. If they know they didn’t the should demand tho testify and demand them to keep on looking for clues. The death penalty gives closure to the victim's families who have suffered so much. Some family members of crime victims may take years or decades to recover from the shock and loss of a loved one. Some may never recover. One of the things that helps hasten this recovery is to achieve some kind of closure. Life in

On October 12, 2011 Laura Webb-Elody and seven others were killed in the Seal Beach Salon Meritage (Webb, 2017). Laura’s mother was also shot, but she did not die. The man went to the Salon where his ex-wife Michelle Fournier worked right beside Laura. He felt the need to punish Michelle so he shot her. He referred to the other victims as “collateral damage”. When he was done in the salon, he went to his car and felt the need to shoot the guy who happened to park next to him. People that saw this happen got his license plate number and then called 911. He was then pulled over and arrested. He still had possession of his three guns that he killed these people with, but he did confess to the crime. Bethany Webb wanted the man that shot her sister to sit in prison for the rest of his life so that he could suffer and think about what he had done. There are several reasons for why the death penalty is not a good solution for punishment. It is not cost effective, it does not allow the individual to sit and think about what they have done, and too many innocent people are killed because of capital punishment. The death penalty should be abolished in the United States Of America. If an individual commits a serious crime or murder they should suffer, which means life in prison.