Persuasive Essay Against Euthanasia

Being one of the most fervid and controversial topic of all, euthanasia, also known as physician-assisted suicide, has initiated a very sensitive discussion on life and death under one’s ability to choose either side. Euthanasia is defined as a “the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy” in Merriam-Webster dictionary. Euthanasia is often classified into three categories depending on having patient’s consent:

There continues to be a lack of consensus in regards to the legalization and implication of euthanasia. The Euthanasia Society of America was founded in 1938 to help educate people on why this process should be legalized (Wells 1284). Through the society, ordinary citizens could learn about all the advantages and disadvantages. The society tries to educate the ill on all of the options that they have in regards to the end of life treatment. Also when medicine can no longer help someone the person should have the right to end their life and alleviate their pain (Diaconescu 474). It should be up to the patient to decide if they are ready to die or if they want to put up a fight to survive. However, if the patient is in a coma or brain dead, family members and doctors should look at the advanced directives that the patient has given. In some cases, patients do not want to be kept alive if a machine is breathing for them (Meisel and Cerminara 2859). The patient should be able to have a choice in the quality of life that they want to live. Another argument is that people believe that church and state should be separate in hospitals as well. Patients do not want doctors being influenced by their religious beliefs when practicing medicine (Sharp, Carr, and Macdonald 275). The legalization of euthanasia shows to have many benefits for the families and patients that are suffering. Also with

When it comes to the topic of euthanasia, most of us will readily agree that it is a debatable topic. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of whether euthanasia should be given to end suffering. Weather some are convinced that there is better ways to go about pain such as hospice to provide them with more comfort, others maintain the idea that euthanasia should be given because people are free to choose how they want to die to end their suffering. My view is that euthanasia should not be legal because euthanasia is still a form of murder and ill people who are depressed tend to be capricious.

The issue of legalizing euthanasia is a highly debated, and emotional issue. There are many pros and cons to each side of this debate. One must weigh each side of the issue, and be sure they have complete, and accurate information before deciding whether euthanasia should be legalized or not. It is crucial to make sure people are using the correct definition of euthanasia, which is “the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma.” Euthanasia should be legalized, because people should have freedom of choice, it is the humane thing to do, and it has many economic benefits.

Visiting the hospice for the twenty-fifth day in a row watching people with Terminal illness slowly spreading throughout their body already lost movement in their arms. once bright eyes have been fading steadily everyday,mouthing the words “Kill me.” What would you do in this situation? It is a cruel reality we live in when watching someone die slowly and painfully is more ethical than helping them end it when its what they want and the only lane down the road This is why assisted-suicide, the involvement of a third-party to provide the materials necessary to commit suicide, should be legalized; it would allow both terminal and permanently disabled patients an escape from the mental, emotional, & physical pain of useless treatments, and impaired quality of life, in their final months. The housing and medicine that patients go through makes the cost of there treatment go through the roof, euthanasia has been legalized in other u.s states and other counties.

Euthanasia (physician-assisted suicide) put terminally ill, children, and the disabled people out of their pain and suffering (Euthanasia, 2017). Many believe the euthanasia is immoral because it makes the value of life go away. Dying is a part of life that can’t be opted out of. No one should get to decide when they want to die, that is not how life works. Terminally ill, children and the disabled should not be treated like they are another expense because they are alive. If anyone were to be treated like they were an inconvenience they wouldn’t want to be alive either. In

One of the biggest controversies in the past decade is whether or not euthanasia should be legalized throughout the United States. Euthanasia, also known as physician assisted suicide, is the practice of ending the life of a patient (Euthanasia). There are different forms of euthanasia; they include direct/indirect, voluntary/involuntary. However, euthanasia in its entirety is what has been debated. Although some oppose the idea, others are in favor of people having the option of euthanasia. Religious concerns may give the process a bad reputation but ultimately in a public facility church and state should not intertwine and it should be the patient’s decision. Additionally, euthanasia not only helps a suffering patient but it may help their families be at peace as well. Many people believe euthanasia should remain illegal because it is inhumane or is against religious beliefs for a human being to assist someone else to end their life. Physician assisted suicide is seen to go against popular belief that it is a doctor’s job to keep a patient alive and healthy. However, a doctor’s job also includes taking the patients opinion and decision on what they want to do with themselves to get better into consideration therefore euthanasia should be legal in the United States.

Throughout the evidence, it is made clear that little is currently certain about this substance. The regulation is hard with no immediate scientific roadside test. Even though there are no long term health effects for people with fully developed brains child exposure is a major concern. Additionally, dependency on the drug could pose a risk to the health and functionality of people in our communities. Although, the decrease in crime and opioid use would inevitably increase the safety of our communities and it is true that the dangers that marijuana poses to our society are already present due to the legal status of alcohol and tobacco. From this information my conclusion would be that it should remain illegal until a functional roadside test is put into place in the form of training of all police officers or an actual sobriety/blood test. I believe that although this could be a great way to make our country more secure, we should be able to have complete regulations before it is legalized nationwide.

Euthanasia is the ability to choose to die willingly. This could be through terminal sickness or near fatal injury of which there is a high chance of dying anyway. The topic is very divisive but currently under Australian law, euthanasia is illegal and considered murder. It is seen as dying without dignity to people who are against euthanasia such as the view that each life is sacred and euthanasia would bring about an increased disregard for life. People in the condition of terminal or incurable illness may be suffering so they may choose to go through with euthanasia which is fine because it’s their lives. The topic of euthanasia in Australia is split. While some say that euthanasia would be dying without dignity, others say that it is a way of showing mercy for those who are suffering and want to end it. Religious teachings on the matter suggest that euthanasia is against all beliefs and should not be practiced.

First, I would like to thank lawmakers for reviewing issues thoroughly and making decisions that would best suit the people. The difficult work you all do have certainly proved that Congress cares for the people of the United States. I am grateful and sure other individuals are too for all the work you do. To give recognition, medical practitioners around the world regularly help individuals to a preferred state whether mentally or physically, even with the risks to perform operations. Thus, it is truly a blessing to have people working in the medical field, saving lives daily and finding new ways to better our health. People who are terminally ill struggle with performing daily tasks such as walking or holding objects and face the unbearable pain that will not even allow tears to shed. This pain creates a train of thoughts to end extreme agony and relieve the distress of family member watching nearby. Mercy killing, or euthanasia is illegal in most states in the United States. Euthanasia is a term most are not familiar with; euthanasia means ‘good death’ in Greek. To further explain, euthanasia is an unforced death in a relatively painless and merciful way. With that being said, lawmakers should reconsider the ban of performing voluntary euthanasia in hospitals for certain cases.

It’s blatantly obvious that euthanasia should be permitted for the reasoning of your own individual rights. If you’re not familiar with the term euthanasia it is a Greek word for easy death. Also meaning “The painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma.” Euthanasia is illegal in most countries, for the fact that you're taking rights away from another human being.

Euthanasia on human beings, also known as assisted suicide, is the collaborate killing of a patient with a terminal illness or a debilitating physical disability in order to end their suffering. The debate on this topic has been fought between the two sides for years. Those opposing assisted suicide as an option for patients claim that patients should not be allowed to die on their own terms because it is legalizing murder, costs too much, and is not morally correct. Because of the limited number of states (five as of 2015 when California passed a bill legalizing it) that euthanasia performed on human beings is legal in, many nurses and physicians have been involved illegally and have been punished for fulfilling the wishes of their patients (Richardson 1). For example, Jack Kevorkian, also known as “Dr. Death,” was “a pathologist who assisted people suffering from acute medical conditions in ending their lives” and eventually spent time in prison for his work (“Jack Kevorkian” 1). Some patients also resort to trying to kill themselves alone, which is more dangerous and risky than what could be done by an authorized physician. Instead of restricting access to physician-assisted deaths, assisted suicide should be legalized by all states in the United States of America for those with terminal illnesses and physical disabilities (and, in some cases, those with mental illnesses) because not doing so would be restricting the rights of people who fall into the aforementioned

The issue of euthanasia is a very emotional subject for most people. When deciding on whether it should or should not be legalized, people must look at the correct definition of euthanasia which is “the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma.” It is crucial to weigh each side of this issue to gain appropriate knowledge and understanding of what it truly means to use euthanasia. It is important to examine the problems and outcomes of this debatable issue. Although the subject of euthanasia has two sides, a compromise can be reached by putting safeguards in place to make sure these terminal patient’s rights are protected, and they are not abused by giving them complete power and knowledge to make this life changing decision.

Euthanasia is derived from the Greek word “easy to die” and is also known as “mercy killing”. Ancient societies allow many babies that were born with a birth defect to die. Also, elder people starve themselves until they die. As well as in the military, soldier were allowed to shoot a partner if he was seriously injured before they get caught by the enemies. In the nineteenth century, the use of anesthetics and painkillers made euthanasia less painful because before that, the methods used for people to commit suicide were violent and uncertain. For centuries, euthanasia has been practiced, but it became an issue in the twentieth century. Euthanasia is a controversial topic because some people think that causing another people death is not ethical, but others think is a way to help people being relieved from their suffering.

In a forest when a tree is dying it is cut down by humans, in its place a new tree will grow roots. Euthanasia and physician assisted suicide are two highly controversial matters both in the field of medicine as well as in the public’s eyes. However, just because these topics are considered unfavorable does not mean we should not consider them. When we have someone who is in immense pain with no chance of ever regaining their health back why should we let them continue to suffer if there are options out there to eliminate the agony they are in. These individuals want to die with their dignity, not in some hospital bed hooked up to a bunch of IV’s or on life support.