Persuasive Essay (Nuclear Energy)

Although nuclear power cost the least for the amount of power it makes, it is still very expensive. To make nuclear power you have to build a nuclear power plant. To build a nuclear power you need millions of dollars. Not only that, you have to also run the nuclear power plant. To run a nuclear power plant you need to either mine the uranium and then refine yourself, or buy the uranium from another company. Once you have done this you need to run everything in the power plant, which cost money, and then pay your workers. Also when creating nuclear energy you create radioactive waste which need to be stored far away somewhere, under surveillance, to make sure that it does not ruin the environment. The owner of exelon, the one who owns Three Mile Island, said that they have lost around 800 million dollars in recent years. If exelon decided to change their mind they would end up losing even more money and eventually have to shut down.

Should nuclear energy be used? Throughout the article “Nowhere to go”, the author objectively reviews the use of nuclear energy, using the text and graphics to provide details that demonstrate the advantages and disadvantages of its use. Nevertheless, the consequences of using nuclear energy outweigh the benefits. One of these consequences is that working with nuclear energy can cause many health problems. The text states, “Dangers include radiation sickness, cancers, and other health problems. High level radioactive waste can present hazards ‘for a million years or more,’ Kamps says.” This means that using nuclear energy can cause health problems for future generations.

Despite the fact the countries continue to increase the production of nuclear energy, my position is that new nuclear power plants should not continue to be built. The current use of nuclear power should be carefully evaluated with a plan to slowly decrease production throughout the world. The negative implications to the environment and economy support my position.

　　　　On contrast, opponents hold different conceptions, they do not regard nuclear energy as a green and clean source of energy. According to Ross(2007), a news director for the National Urban League, fuel rods at every nuclear plant leak radioactive and harmful gases to atmosphere, and it is collectively releasing millions of curies annually. As a matter of fact, the essential raw material for nuclear nuclear power is uranium, which is a dangerous radioactive element. Opponents also claims that uranium tailing which is byproduct of the procession of getting energy are being inappropriately disposed, which make the situation even worse. On the other hand, after the tragedies of nuclear energy in Chernobyl, three mile island and other district, some people have become more and more impregnable to believe the nuclear energy is dangerous. Dr.

When people hear the term “nuclear energy”, the first thing that jumps to their minds is most often “danger”. Who could blame the world for their intense fears of nuclear power, especially after reading the reports from Dr. Ira Helfand and the American writer, David Biello? Dr. Helfand’s article, “Radiation’s Risk to Public Health”, attacks the nuclear energy with facts and concerns like those of the National Research Council BEIR VI report. Whereas Dr. Helfand supports his claims with scientific evidence, David Biello only had a script from a discussion that followed the Fukushima crisis. David Biello’s article, “How Safe Are U.S. Nuclear Reactors? Lessons from Fukushima”, he uncovers secret concerns and future plans about the incredibly disastrous incident. Although David Biello used credible sources and attempted to appeal to ethos, logos, and pathos, Dr. Ira Helfand contains an authority in his education and knows a great deal more about nuclear power and definitely has the best representation of ethos, logos, and pathos.

element uranium may be turned into a new and important source of energy in the immediate future." Even then, the potential to harness nuclear power as an energy source was recognized. Six years later, the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, killing an estimated two-hundred thousand people and forever linking the word 'nuclear ' with death and destruction (Danzer 790). Since that day, nuclear power has been trying to throw off the shadow of its dark beginnings. However, there are numerous people to this day that remain wary of this particular power source. Often safety is called into question, citing major disasters as reasons to forgo its use. Efficiency and cost are also brought up, questioning whether nuclear power is a better alternative financially. Many people fail to realize there is more to nuclear energy than the what bedtime horror stories reveal. Nuclear power is a safe and effective energy source that should be utilized more than it is now.

The Three Mile Island accident happened on March 28th, 1979 near Middletown, Pennsylvania (Vijayan, Kamble, Nayak, Vaze, and Sinha 2013). Ignorant workers, defects in the design of the plant, and disastrous equipment were major components in the Three Mile Island disaster. Basically, a valve erupted from too much pressure; this released just under 1,000,000 gallons of polluted water into the basement of the plant. Only a small amount of radiation was leaked into the atmosphere, but it was enough to scare people for years to come (Vijayan, Kamble, Nayak, Vaze, and Sinha 2013). Only fractions of a millirem were found 50 miles away from the accident. A rem is a large dose of radiation; a millirem is a thousandth of a rem (Edelson, 1986). This shows that there was not much radiation that leaked into the atmosphere, unlike Chernobyl. In Sweden, they discovered numerous millirems of radiation, which puts into perspective how big the Chernobyl disaster was. After the Three Mile Island Accident, there were major changes including safety and defense-in-depth improvements (Vijayan, Kamble, Nayak, Vaze, and Sinha 2013). The United States put forth major changes in safety and technology for their nuclear power plants after the Three Mile Island accident, but the Soviet Union did not believe this would happen in their plants. They believed they had no flaws in their system and didn’t want to add stronger safety features to their nuclear power plants to protect them from

There have been lots of nuclear accident around the world. One of the accident that had a major impact on the world was the Chernobyl disaster. The disaster took place on 26 April 1986 at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in Ukraine. The disaster was caused by a reaction explosion induced by design faults and staff application errors. The accident took place in the course of scheduled tests to check the power supply mode in the event of external sources loss. Even after 10 days, explosions and ejections of radioactive substances continued. The release of radiation and radioactive substance polluted the places within 30 km of Chernobyl, and those areas have been closed for a long period of

When it comes to power, there are a lot of ways to produce it. Inventors are constantly looking for new and more efficient ways to create power. Unfortunately, scientists found a powerful new way to create energy but not intentionally for electrical fuel. In 1945, J. Robert Oppenheimer was part of the team that created the very first atomic bomb made from Plutonium. The first nuclear power plant was not created until 1954. Despite incidents such as Chernobyl, Fukushima, Three Mile Island accident, and the SL-1 accident, the government claims that nuclear power plants cannot possibly have a core meltdown. For years, groups of scientists, doctors, and nuclear specialists have been trying to combat the growth and use of nuclear power plants

The world as we know today is dependent on energy. The options we have currently enable us to produce energy economically but at a cost to the environment. As fossil fuel source will be diminishing over time, other alternatives will be needed. An alternative that is presently utilized is nuclear energy. Nuclear energy is currently the most efficacious energy source. Every time the word ‘nuclear’ is mentioned, the first thought that people have is the devastating effects of nuclear energy. Granting it does come with its drawbacks; this form of energy emits far less pollution than conventional power plants. Even though certain disadvantages of nuclear energy are devastating, the advantages contain even greater rewards.

When one hears the words ‘nuclear power’ they are immediately offset with images of Fukushima, Chernobyl, and Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These were agreeably a few devastatingly deadly and lasting disasters involving nuclear energy. With newer technologies and processes such as the use of nuclear fission, however, harnessing nuclear energy has become a safe practice. The global climate and overall health of the world is shifting toward the worse, and humanity only has itself to blame. It is time that society sets its fears aside and paves the way for the most effective, and ethical energy alternative for the sake of its beautiful home, Earth. Nuclear fission energy has the potential to power the entire world in a way that is clean, sustainable, and energy-prolific.

The ongoing debate is whether or not nuclear energy should be utilized. Nuclear energy, as defined by dictionary.com, is “energy released by reactions within atomic nuclei, as in nuclear fission or fusion.” Nuclear Fission is the process by which a large nucleus splits into two small nuclei and releases energy. Nuclear fusion is a reaction in which matter is converted into energy. Both opposing sides, either for or against the use of nuclear energy, have justified reasoning behind their thoughts. The benefits and disadvantages of nuclear energy are numerous. The positives when using nuclear energy are undeniable, yet arguably too dangerous. Nuclear energy produces the same amount of energy as 1,500,000 kilograms of coal, from just one kilogram of uranium - 235, according to the article in Document B, Boon or Bane?. However, in the same article, the author presents the idea that Uranium is an exhaustible fuel, so it will eventually run out. Another negative is the ominous threat of an incident, as nuclear energy is extremely hazardous to people and the environment.Although the usage of nuclear energy has many disadvantages, the benefits of nuclear energy outweigh the negatives, because nuclear energy successfully, easily produces an immeasurably large amount of energy without directly emitting air pollution, and it provides numerous jobs to people, as well as provide millions of dollars in taxes.

Global demand and consumption of energy is at an all time high; the world needs a safe, efficient, clean, and high producing source of energy production. The solution is something we already use for energy production, Nuclear power. From the beginning of nuclear energy there has been concerns over the safety of the power plants and its impact on the environment. With climate change and more accurate information on nuclear power the tide is shifting in its favor. This paper will explore the positives of nuclear power, political change on nuclear power, safety of the energy source and new technologies associated with the nuclear power process. Most importantly are the risks associated with nuclear power worth it? Research suggests that nuclear power is safer now more than ever and has less of an impact on the environment than coal or oil. Public support and misconceptions over the years have been up and down due to political agendas and those who are misinformed about nuclear power. Individuals who are involved in the energy field are in favor of nuclear power and building more plants with newer technology.

“In 2016, nuclear energy accounted for 59.9 percent of U.S. emission generation,” according to (greenpeace.org). This is nearly as much carbon dioxide as would be produced from some 118 million cars per year. To think the United States is funding an operation that is slowing, but surely doing damage to the environment is profound. There are other options then to only relying on hazardous nuclear energy as a source of power. Just by making the switch to using renewable energy resources would cause the amount of pollution released in the U.S to drop by a little over thirty percent, and the cost of production would decrease by more than fifty percent of what it is today. Removing nuclear power plants and implementing the usage of renewable energy resources throughout the U.S. would be highly beneficial because it would cause less damage to the environment, it would allow for a cost effective alternative source of energy, and it would reduce the vulnerability of the public.

     A serious incident occurred at a nuclear power plant in 1975 as a result of a fire