Persuasive Essay On Animal Rights

Ever since a young age, I have been a passionate animal enthusiast. I cannot image a life without a dog by my side. Animals are not just pets, or food, or part of the environment. They are intelligent creatures and deserve to be treated as such. Animals have evolved just as we have. The evolution theory even says humans evolved from primates. So why do animals not have rights? They have a brain and can learn and grow, just as we can. It can also be argued that animals have a soul. I believe animals not only have dignity, but they also have rights.

Animal Cruelty is a problem that many ignore. People are oblivious to these animals and the negligence their owners show. Animal cruelty is an underlying problem in today’s society, and the only way to counteract these problems, is for this generation to do something about it.

For thousands of years, animals have served the human race, whether it be for food, clothing, companionship, or laborious tasks. However, it wasn’t until 1966 that animals in the United States gained rights recognized by the government. The Animal Welfare Act protects the rights of cats, dogs, livestock, and various mammals from inhumane treatment and regulates their transportation, sale, and handling. To animal rights activists, this vague piece of legislation is simply not adequate. Animals such as birds and rodents are not even mentioned, and many of the animals that are supposed to be protected by this law are still the victims of cruel experimentation and exploited by inhumane factories. Vigorous action has been taken by groups commonly identified as terrorists, such as the Animal Liberation Front, but with no long-term effects such as improvements made on existing laws. They argue that sentient beings--animals capable of emotions--should be protected by the same legislation that governs humans. It is vital that new laws are created and enforced in order to end the cruel and inhumane treatment of animals in the United States.

Animal testing has been one of the issues that people are fighting overtime because of its moral. Even though some results of tests are successful on people, many people are still fighting for the animal’s rights. They believe that animals should have their own rights to live a free life where they belong, just like their species. In scientists point of view, animals have been one of the main subjects to test on, but a lot of them are currently looking forward to use and develop alternatives for the cruel act of animal testing.

In an animal lover’s world , killing an animal is a crime. Animals are innocent .In her article “The Truth about Farm Animals” , former farmer Heather Rose explains, “Animals around the U.S are mistreated every day and we don’t even know about it. They are kept in small cages often with so little space that they can't even turn around or lie down comfortably” (Reno NV). People express that our do these things since, people have rights and animals don't. At the point when people say things like that, it makes me so furious, what has this world come to when we say that animals don't have rights. Is it since they can't talk? Or, on the other hand is it since they are not human and we should regard them as we would a cloth doll. We shouldn't treat animals along these lines regardless, there are better approaches to get the meat at that point by killing it at 5-7 weeks old (chicken) or six months(pigs). I believe that killing animals is pure evil , I mean it's despicable , Animals have lives

To begin with, animals ' rights are abused when they are utilized as a part of research.  Animals and individuals are similar in numerous ways; they both feel, think, act on, and encounter torment. Therefore, animals should be treated with the same dignity as people. However animals ' rights are disregarded when they are utilized as a part of research since they are not given a decision. Animals are subjected to tests that are again and again agonizing or cause lasting harm or even death, and they are never given the alternative of not taking part in the experiment. Animals don 't freely give themselves up for the progression of

Animal rights activists are rallying and petitioning for an animal bill of rights because they are stating that animals are only being considered “property” by law, being no different than a table and chair. The Animal Legal Defense Fund is really passionate about the document being published even having specific rights for animals with numbering and strong evidence to back up each right and claim, leaving little detail out. Also, in the article “A Change of Heart About Animals” written by Jeremy Rifkin states “What these researchers are finding is that many of our fellow creatures are more like us than we had ever imagined” (Rikin 2). I agree with his statement, because animals and humans have many similarities pointed out by many researchers over the many years we have existed on this planet. He provides specific evidence like Koko the gorilla, who passed an IQ test with a score of 70-95 or around that range and basically I think it's pretty amazing, sad, and ironic that Koko is smarter than a majority than humans. There was also a parrot named alex who could communicate with it's owner and tell her how many of each colored shape was on a plate which was presented to him, and literally asked for a glass of water and I think that is honestly incredible.

There are people in today’s society who don’t believe animals deserve to have rights simply because they are “lower animals”. Mark Twain, however, would argue that humans are the lowest of the animals in his essay “The Lowest Animal”. Cruelty to animals, also called animal abuse or animal neglect, is defined as the human infliction of suffering or harm upon any non-human animal, for purposes other than self-defense or survival (dictionary.com). Everyday, animals are locked in cages, beaten, tested on, tortured, and abandoned. Those horrible things occur in every society, and only select groups of people and organizations try to prevent it.

The Animal Bill of Rights are laws that provide animals with rights to protect them and their dignity. Over the years there's been quite a controversy whether if animals should be given rights and a curiosity about their capabilities and if it's enough for them to be guaranteed the rights that a human has. Although it has been proven that animals indeed to have feelings and knowledge to their existence and even causes and effects of life or death, many people in the US still don't agree that animals should have rights. Many of the people who don't agree are more curious as to what would happen and the lengths these rights would go for animals and how it would affect the lives of humans. They laugh at the fact that these rights could possibly apply to all animals even the smallest ones when it shouldn't be a matter of humor. I think the real reason they laugh is because they're afraid of what these animals can do that could possibly outsmart humans in any way. These animals have suffered for years and they finally get to shine and their abuse finally comes to light and more people are realizing the inhumane acts these poor animals go through.

To understand the issue, we must define key terms related to animal cruelty. Animal cruelty is defined “ legally… as any act of violence or neglect that inflicts suffering or death on an animal” and it consists of two parts: passive and active (Animal Cruelty). Passive cruelty is when animals are neglected by their owners, usually unknowingly or unwillingly. For example, when a person hoards dozens of animals at a time and doesn’t have the means to care for every single one of them, the animals are withheld the necessary care like food, water, shelter, veterinary care, etc. Active cruelty, on the other hand, is when an animal is abused with the intention of inflicting injury or death. This is seen in bloodsport, like dogfighting, in torture, beating, mutilation, poisoning, or shooting or when the animal is kept in a confined cage (Animal Cruelty). Active cruelty is also seen in puppy mills or in situations that turn a profit, like trafficking or animal breeding. The USDA provides many guidelines regarding the care standards of the animals in the breeding mills, however most of them have up to a thousand breeding animals so their care comes second to the profit they make off of the offsprings.

Your unwitting response only proves how adamant you are to twist and bend the rules to your convenience. The rules clearly state that "the tenant will ALSO be notified", with no further stipulation indicating that said notification is to further be forwarded by the owner of the unit. Also, VERBAL complaints are invalid, as you have stated numerous times, whenever we have addresses our own concerns with other dogs/people in the building. Therefore, you are purposely suppressing the rights we are entitled to, which is absolutely ridiculous and indicative of your personal agenda to attack, harass and discriminate against us, for no reason; which is a clear violation of the regulations set forth by the FHA, not to mention a violation of the IDFPR oath you are supposed to uphold as a licensed community association manager.

Today we live in a world of opposites: animal lovers and activists who strive to make equality for all living things and people who have anthropocentric mindsets which causes them to believe that animals are undeserving of rights. Should not there be rights for all living things? Well, at least this is what I believe, and I did not come to this conclusion on my own. The way I view animal rights is tremendously influenced by my exposure to media, my personal experiences, and the values of my generation.

Animal rights has always been conversional subject, what rights do they have, what type of treatment they may endure, and what is wildlife versus what are pets. Society as it a whole as always had used animals as form entertainment for example like zoos, circuses, aquariums, rodeos, animal fighting and hunting. Though these types of entertainments project as innocent forms of fun for all ages when it’s enslavement for the animals. These animals are taken from their homes to be forced behind cages, glass and concert walls to perform for the paying customer. The animals see millions of human faces pressed against these walls staring in hoping to see them do tricks or just move in general. These animals are also forced to perform and train for hours on in just to be a meal ticket for the right buyer.

Argument for Animal Rights The argument for animal rights assumes that animals posses their own lives and deserve to be assigned rights in order to protect their wellbeing. This view insists that animals are not merely goods utilised only to benefit mankind and they should be allowed to choose how they want to live their lives, free from the constraints of man. But if animals are given absolute rights, then surely they shouldn’t be allowed to kill each other, as this would be a violation of these rights.

Often humans feel that an animal’s life is less valuable than a human life, who is a human to judge that? Even though animals do have rights, they don’t have enough to keep them safe. Animals do not deserve to be used, and/or abused. Animals should have their own rights; people shouldn’t get to choose what they should be used for, or where they should be.