Persuasive Essay On Animal Testing

Animal testing is a common practice in current life that is necessary to ensure the safety of the humans that will be using the tested product. There are many good and bad aspects of animal testing, but the pros clearly outweigh the cons. Animal testing has been around since ancient times when animals were dissected to gain knowledge about the body and organs. The animals killed from animal testing make up a tiny percentage of the total animals killed every year. When just considering the animals used for food compared to the animals used for testing, testing animals make up a mere 2.6 percent of that number. Public safety far outweighs the lives of the small amount of animals killed.

More than 100 million animals suffer and die in the U.S. every year in cruel chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics tests as well as in medical training exercises and curiosity-driven medical experiments at universities. Animals also suffer and die in classroom biology experiments and dissection, even though modern non-animal tests have repeatedly been shown to have more educational value, save teachers time, and save schools money. Exact numbers aren't available because mice, rats, birds, and cold-blooded animals—who make up more than 99 percent of animals used in experiments—are not covered by even the minimal protections of the Animal Welfare Act and therefore go uncounted.

Millions of animals die each year in the U.S. Many of these animals have been through an awful lot. The reason behind these animal deaths is because of the people experimenting on them in order to find cures to things or find things that have not been found. Each one of these experiments contributes to the deaths of these innocent animals, that is why animals should not be tested on.

Ninety percent of the medicines we test on animals have not helped humans, they also do not reliably predict results for humans. According to Neurologist Aysha Akhtar 100 stroke drugs were effective on animals but failed on humans. Experiments animals undergo are often flawed and waste the lives of animals. Thomas Hartung states “it's very hard to create an animal model that even equates closely to what we're trying to achieve in the human.” Animal testing might also mislead researchers to the fact that animals have a different response to medicines that might be helpful to humans, for example Aspirin is dangerous to some animals. Animal testing is also more expensive than alternate methods we have found.

In American society, many groups and organizations are debating whether or not animal testing should be banned. Some people believe that there are reasons why animal testing should be done. Others believe that animal testing is morally wrong. Some experts believe that there are other options available. I believe that animal testing is wrong based on three observations: animal testing is unethical, pointless, and abusive.

Medical research involving testing on animals is a divisive subject, as is any ethical issue. The medical community at large advocates for this practice as a medical research necessity, seemingly without considering the available alternatives. If society wants to make a change, we must do it by removing the option of animal testing, so that the medical community will have be forced to consider and improve the numerous alternatives. Medical research involving animal testing should be forbidden by law because it is an unethical practice, there are alternatives available, and because the results obtained from animal testing are often irrelevant to humans.

The Animal Welfare Act protects animals that are used in laboratories by including “regulations … for the transportation, purchase, sale, housing, care, handling, and treatment” of animals (NAVS). However this act only helps dogs, cats, monkeys, guinea pigs, hamsters, and rabbits. The act doesn’t include commonly used animals such as mice and rats, allowing the scientists to treat them however they want to. In fact, “mice, rats, birds, and cold-blooded animals … make up 99 percent of the animals used in experiments” (PETA). Therefore, this 99 percent isn’t protected and makes the Animal Welfare Act practically irrelevant. The treatment of these animals is completely ignored by the AWA and the animals seemingly don’t matter in the eyes of the

There are many animals around the world that suffer every year from testing of cosmetic products. Animals ranging from rats, guinea pigs, rabbits and even dogs are violently mistreated in the process. Several tests are used on them to examine chemicals necessary to create products utilized everyday by people from all around. The public needs to be informed of the kind of abuse these innocent animals undergo and what should get done in order to end this cruelty. Together as a society, we can save the lives of thousands of innocent animals.

Many animals used in experiments are not protected by the Animal Welfare Act. The AWA does not cover rats, mice, fish and birds, which make up around 95% of the animals used in research. It covered 1,134,693 animals used for testing in 2010, still leaving around 25 million other animals not covered. These animals are therefore helpless without the protection of the AWA. Even with the protection of the AWA animals are still tortured and killed daily in laboratories across the

Most of the test that are tested on are for cosmetic testing, toxicology testing, drug testing, biomedical research, and also for educational reasons. And most the animals that get tested on usually the drugs work on them but end up not working on humans, another reason why animal testing is bad. Rabbits get tested on for contact lenses and after researchers have put the lenses in the rabbits the take lenses out and take the rabbit’s eye out.

As others can argue that animal testing is a good thing because it could be essential for research. It has been shown that in some cases animal testing has led to miraculous recoveries. In some cases it has been known that the removal of a dog’s pancreas can create insulin. Another interesting fact is that most people don’t know that rats

First, animals test does not reliably predict results in human beings. Ninety four percent of drugs that past animals test fail in humans clinical traits. This proof right here shows that animal test do not reliably predict results in human beings. According to neurologist Aysha Akhtar. MD, mph over 100 stroke drugs that were effective when tested on animals, have failed in humans. There is no point to do animal testing if most of it does not even work on humans. Over 85 HIV vaccines failed in humans after working well in non human primates. They are making vaccines that don't even work on us humans so I don’t know why they keep trying.

There is no reason for you to be worried about animal testing once you have read this. Animal research is done for many good reasons. For Example, animal research is done so that people's lives can be saved by finding new cures for diseases. Even different associations are fine by it. If that's no help, then just think about this, we kill more animals to eat more than for animal testing. In that case, animal testing saves human lives, associations agree to it, and animals are going to die anyways.

Did you know that animal testing facilities not only test on animals, but they abuse the animals if they don't behave? The animals are abused emotionally and physically. The animals don't get any love and they get hit to top it all off. Animals should not be used for scientific resources because a lot of the tests put animals in danger, the test can grow from danger of death, and animals have rights just as you and I have rights, and give them a voice.

26 million animals are used every single year in the US for scientific, and commercial testing. Animals are usually used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of certain medications, or any products meant for human use, or other biomedical, commercial, and health care uses. Testing on animals has been lasting from at least 500 BC.